TSTP Solution File: SET382-6 by E-SAT---3.1.00

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem  : SET382-6 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 02:58:22 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.14s 0.44s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.14s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   37 (  15 unt;   4 nHn;  27 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   69 (  13 equ;  33 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   2 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   69 (   4 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(subclass_members,axiom,
    ( member(X3,X2)
    | ~ subclass(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X3,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',subclass_members) ).

cnf(not_subclass_members2,axiom,
    ( subclass(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(not_subclass_element(X1,X2),X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',not_subclass_members2) ).

cnf(intersection3,axiom,
    ( member(X1,intersection(X2,X3))
    | ~ member(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X1,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',intersection3) ).

cnf(prove_corollary_1_to_relation_property2_1,negated_conjecture,
    subclass(x,cross_product(universal_class,universal_class)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_corollary_1_to_relation_property2_1) ).

cnf(not_subclass_members1,axiom,
    ( member(not_subclass_element(X1,X2),X1)
    | subclass(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',not_subclass_members1) ).

cnf(intersection2,axiom,
    ( member(X1,X3)
    | ~ member(X1,intersection(X2,X3)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',intersection2) ).

cnf(prove_corollary_1_to_relation_property2_2,negated_conjecture,
    restrict(x,universal_class,universal_class) != x,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_corollary_1_to_relation_property2_2) ).

cnf(restriction2,axiom,
    intersection(cross_product(X1,X2),X3) = restrict(X3,X1,X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',restriction2) ).

cnf(restriction1,axiom,
    intersection(X1,cross_product(X2,X3)) = restrict(X1,X2,X3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',restriction1) ).

cnf(subclass_implies_equal,axiom,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ~ subclass(X1,X2)
    | ~ subclass(X2,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',subclass_implies_equal) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( member(X3,X2)
    | ~ subclass(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X3,X1) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[subclass_members]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( subclass(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(not_subclass_element(X1,X2),X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[not_subclass_members2]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( member(X1,intersection(X2,X3))
    | ~ member(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X1,X3) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[intersection3]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( member(X3,X2)
    | ~ subclass(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X3,X1) ),
    c_0_10 ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    subclass(x,cross_product(universal_class,universal_class)),
    prove_corollary_1_to_relation_property2_1 ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( subclass(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(not_subclass_element(X1,X2),X2) ),
    c_0_11 ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( member(X1,intersection(X2,X3))
    | ~ member(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X1,X3) ),
    c_0_12 ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ( member(X1,cross_product(universal_class,universal_class))
    | ~ member(X1,x) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,axiom,
    ( member(not_subclass_element(X1,X2),X1)
    | subclass(X1,X2) ),
    not_subclass_members1 ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( member(X1,X3)
    | ~ member(X1,intersection(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[intersection2]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    restrict(x,universal_class,universal_class) != x,
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_corollary_1_to_relation_property2_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( subclass(X1,intersection(X2,X3))
    | ~ member(not_subclass_element(X1,intersection(X2,X3)),X3)
    | ~ member(not_subclass_element(X1,intersection(X2,X3)),X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    ( member(not_subclass_element(x,X1),cross_product(universal_class,universal_class))
    | subclass(x,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,axiom,
    intersection(cross_product(X1,X2),X3) = restrict(X3,X1,X2),
    restriction2 ).

cnf(c_0_24,axiom,
    intersection(X1,cross_product(X2,X3)) = restrict(X1,X2,X3),
    restriction1 ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( member(X1,X3)
    | ~ member(X1,intersection(X2,X3)) ),
    c_0_19 ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    restrict(x,universal_class,universal_class) != x,
    c_0_20 ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ~ subclass(X1,X2)
    | ~ subclass(X2,X1) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[subclass_implies_equal]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    ( subclass(x,intersection(X1,cross_product(universal_class,universal_class)))
    | ~ member(not_subclass_element(x,intersection(X1,cross_product(universal_class,universal_class))),X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    intersection(cross_product(X1,X2),X3) = intersection(X3,cross_product(X1,X2)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    ( member(not_subclass_element(intersection(X1,X2),X3),X2)
    | subclass(intersection(X1,X2),X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    intersection(x,cross_product(universal_class,universal_class)) != x,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ~ subclass(X1,X2)
    | ~ subclass(X2,X1) ),
    c_0_27 ).

cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    subclass(x,intersection(cross_product(universal_class,universal_class),x)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_18]),c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    subclass(intersection(X1,X2),X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
    intersection(cross_product(universal_class,universal_class),x) != x,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]),c_0_34])]),c_0_35]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.08  % Problem    : SET382-6 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.04/0.09  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.09/0.29  % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.29  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.29  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.29  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.09/0.29  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.09/0.29  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.09/0.29  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.09/0.29  % DateTime   : Mon May 20 13:17:37 EDT 2024
% 0.09/0.29  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.14/0.38  Running first-order model finding
% 0.14/0.38  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.44  # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.14/0.44  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.44  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.44  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.44  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.44  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.44  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.44  # C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 23527 completed with status 0
% 0.14/0.44  # Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 0.14/0.44  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.44  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.44  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.44  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.14/0.44  # Search class: FGHSM-FFLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.44  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.14/0.44  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 313s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.44  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.44  # Starting new_bool_1 with 308s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.44  # Starting sh5l with 304s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.44  # Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.44  # C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 23535 completed with status 0
% 0.14/0.44  # Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 0.14/0.44  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.44  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.44  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.44  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.14/0.44  # Search class: FGHSM-FFLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.44  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.14/0.44  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 313s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.44  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.44  # Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 0.14/0.44  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.14/0.44  
% 0.14/0.44  # Proof found!
% 0.14/0.44  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.14/0.44  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.14/0.44  # Parsed axioms                        : 114
% 0.14/0.44  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.14/0.44  # Initial clauses                      : 114
% 0.14/0.44  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 17
% 0.14/0.44  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 97
% 0.14/0.44  # Processed clauses                    : 522
% 0.14/0.44  # ...of these trivial                  : 3
% 0.14/0.44  # ...subsumed                          : 126
% 0.14/0.44  # ...remaining for further processing  : 393
% 0.14/0.44  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 6
% 0.14/0.44  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.14/0.44  # Backward-subsumed                    : 14
% 0.14/0.44  # Backward-rewritten                   : 39
% 0.14/0.44  # Generated clauses                    : 982
% 0.14/0.44  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 914
% 0.14/0.44  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.14/0.44  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 4
% 0.14/0.44  # Paramodulations                      : 974
% 0.14/0.44  # Factorizations                       : 2
% 0.14/0.44  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.14/0.44  # Equation resolutions                 : 6
% 0.14/0.44  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.14/0.44  # Total rewrite steps                  : 178
% 0.14/0.44  # ...of those cached                   : 132
% 0.14/0.44  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.14/0.44  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.14/0.44  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.14/0.44  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.14/0.44  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.14/0.44  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.14/0.44  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.14/0.44  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.14/0.44  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.14/0.44  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.14/0.44  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.14/0.44  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.14/0.44  # Current number of processed clauses  : 240
% 0.14/0.44  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 40
% 0.14/0.44  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 0.14/0.44  #    Negative unit clauses             : 3
% 0.14/0.44  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 196
% 0.14/0.44  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 555
% 0.14/0.44  # ...number of literals in the above   : 1636
% 0.14/0.44  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.14/0.44  # Current number of archived clauses   : 166
% 0.14/0.44  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 9639
% 0.14/0.44  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5375
% 0.14/0.44  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 125
% 0.14/0.44  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 293
% 0.14/0.44  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.14/0.44  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 25
% 0.14/0.44  # BW rewrite match successes           : 9
% 0.14/0.44  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.14/0.44  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.14/0.44  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 32960
% 0.14/0.44  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 185
% 0.14/0.44  
% 0.14/0.44  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.44  # User time                : 0.042 s
% 0.14/0.44  # System time              : 0.006 s
% 0.14/0.44  # Total time               : 0.048 s
% 0.14/0.44  # Maximum resident set size: 2008 pages
% 0.14/0.44  
% 0.14/0.44  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.44  # User time                : 0.221 s
% 0.14/0.44  # System time              : 0.007 s
% 0.14/0.44  # Total time               : 0.228 s
% 0.14/0.44  # Maximum resident set size: 1796 pages
% 0.14/0.44  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------