TSTP Solution File: SET355+4 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : SET355+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 00:11:12 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 7.57s 2.30s
% Output : CNFRefutation 7.57s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 13 ( 5 unt; 2 nHn; 11 RR)
% Number of literals : 23 ( 0 equ; 10 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 16 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_21,plain,
( member(X1,sum(X2))
| ~ member(X1,X3)
| ~ member(X3,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-82hhp9ox/input.p',i_0_21) ).
cnf(i_0_25,negated_conjecture,
member(esk5_0,esk4_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-82hhp9ox/input.p',i_0_25) ).
cnf(i_0_18,plain,
( subset(X1,X2)
| ~ member(esk2_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-82hhp9ox/input.p',i_0_18) ).
cnf(i_0_19,plain,
( subset(X1,X2)
| member(esk2_2(X1,X2),X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-82hhp9ox/input.p',i_0_19) ).
cnf(i_0_24,negated_conjecture,
~ subset(esk5_0,sum(esk4_0)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-82hhp9ox/input.p',i_0_24) ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
( member(X1,sum(X2))
| ~ member(X1,X3)
| ~ member(X3,X2) ),
i_0_21 ).
cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
member(esk5_0,esk4_0),
i_0_25 ).
cnf(c_0_33,plain,
( subset(X1,X2)
| ~ member(esk2_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
i_0_18 ).
cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
( member(X1,sum(esk4_0))
| ~ member(X1,esk5_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,plain,
( subset(X1,sum(esk4_0))
| ~ member(esk2_2(X1,sum(esk4_0)),esk5_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]) ).
cnf(c_0_36,plain,
( subset(X1,X2)
| member(esk2_2(X1,X2),X1) ),
i_0_19 ).
cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
~ subset(esk5_0,sum(esk4_0)),
i_0_24 ).
cnf(c_0_38,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_36]),c_0_37]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SET355+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sun Jul 10 03:10:12 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.44 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.19/0.45 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.45 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.19/0.45 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.19/0.45 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 7.57/2.30 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN:
% 7.57/2.30 # Version: 2.1pre011
% 7.57/2.30 # Preprocessing time : 0.010 s
% 7.57/2.30
% 7.57/2.30 # Proof found!
% 7.57/2.30 # SZS status Theorem
% 7.57/2.30 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.57/2.30 # Proof object total steps : 13
% 7.57/2.30 # Proof object clause steps : 8
% 7.57/2.30 # Proof object formula steps : 5
% 7.57/2.30 # Proof object conjectures : 5
% 7.57/2.30 # Proof object clause conjectures : 3
% 7.57/2.30 # Proof object formula conjectures : 2
% 7.57/2.30 # Proof object initial clauses used : 5
% 7.57/2.30 # Proof object initial formulas used : 5
% 7.57/2.30 # Proof object generating inferences : 3
% 7.57/2.30 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 1
% 7.57/2.30 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.57/2.30 # Parsed axioms : 31
% 7.57/2.30 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 7.57/2.30 # Initial clauses : 31
% 7.57/2.30 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 7.57/2.30 # Initial clauses in saturation : 31
% 7.57/2.30 # Processed clauses : 110
% 7.57/2.30 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 7.57/2.30 # ...subsumed : 11
% 7.57/2.30 # ...remaining for further processing : 99
% 7.57/2.30 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 7
% 7.57/2.30 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 7.57/2.30 # Backward-subsumed : 1
% 7.57/2.30 # Backward-rewritten : 1
% 7.57/2.30 # Generated clauses : 406
% 7.57/2.30 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 373
% 7.57/2.30 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 7.57/2.30 # Paramodulations : 387
% 7.57/2.30 # Factorizations : 12
% 7.57/2.30 # Equation resolutions : 7
% 7.57/2.30 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 7.57/2.30 # Propositional unsat check successes : 0
% 7.57/2.30 # Current number of processed clauses : 94
% 7.57/2.30 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 29
% 7.57/2.30 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 7.57/2.30 # Negative unit clauses : 19
% 7.57/2.30 # Non-unit-clauses : 46
% 7.57/2.30 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 266
% 7.57/2.30 # ...number of literals in the above : 521
% 7.57/2.30 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 7.57/2.30 # Current number of archived clauses : 2
% 7.57/2.30 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 319
% 7.57/2.30 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 281
% 7.57/2.30 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 3
% 7.57/2.30 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 210
% 7.57/2.30 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 7.57/2.30 # BW rewrite match attempts : 72
% 7.57/2.30 # BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 7.57/2.30 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 7.57/2.30 # Condensation successes : 0
% 7.57/2.30 # Termbank termtop insertions : 4545
% 7.57/2.30
% 7.57/2.30 # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.57/2.30 # User time : 0.013 s
% 7.57/2.30 # System time : 0.002 s
% 7.57/2.30 # Total time : 0.015 s
% 7.57/2.30 # ...preprocessing : 0.010 s
% 7.57/2.30 # ...main loop : 0.005 s
% 7.57/2.30 # Maximum resident set size: 7140 pages
% 7.57/2.30
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------