TSTP Solution File: SET343-6 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : SET343-6 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 05:17:36 EDT 2022

% Result   : Timeout 300.05s 300.23s
% Output   : None 
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : SET343-6 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 04:00:42 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.37  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.12/0.37  The process was started by sandbox2 on n016.cluster.edu,
% 0.12/0.37  Mon Jul 11 04:00:42 2022
% 0.12/0.37  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 2161.
% 0.12/0.37  
% 0.12/0.37  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.12/0.37  set(auto).
% 0.12/0.37     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.12/0.37     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.12/0.37     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.12/0.37     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.12/0.37     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.12/0.37     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.12/0.37     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.12/0.37     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.12/0.37     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.12/0.37     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.12/0.37     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.12/0.37     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.12/0.37     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.12/0.37  clear(print_given).
% 0.12/0.37  
% 0.12/0.37  list(usable).
% 0.12/0.37  
% 0.12/0.37  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=5.
% 0.12/0.37  
% 0.12/0.37  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 0.12/0.37  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.12/0.37  unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.12/0.37  clauses in usable.
% 0.12/0.37  
% 0.12/0.37     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.12/0.37     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.12/0.37     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.12/0.37     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.12/0.37     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.12/0.37     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.12/0.37     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.12/0.37     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.12/0.37     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.12/0.37     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.12/0.37     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.12/0.37     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.12/0.37     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.12/0.37     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.12/0.37     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.12/0.37  
% 0.12/0.37  ------------> process usable:
% 0.12/0.37  
% 0.12/0.37  ------------> process sos:
% 0.12/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 164 during input processing: 0 [copy,164,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.12/0.37  164 back subsumes 75.
% 0.12/0.37  
% 0.12/0.37  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.76/1.00  
% 0.76/1.00  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.76/1.00  
% 0.76/1.00  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.76/1.00  
% 0.76/1.00  
% 0.76/1.00  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.76/1.00  
% 0.76/1.00  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.76/1.00  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.76/1.00  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.76/1.00  number of clauses in intial UL: 60
% 0.76/1.00  number of clauses initially in problem: 144
% 0.76/1.00  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 41
% 0.76/1.00  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 65
% 0.76/1.00  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.76/1.00  absolute distinct symbol count: 60
% 0.76/1.00     distinct predicate count: 11
% 0.76/1.00     distinct function count: 34
% 0.76/1.00     distinct constant count: 15
% 0.76/1.00  
% 0.76/1.00  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.76/1.00  
% 0.76/1.00  
% 0.76/1.00  
% 0.76/1.00  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.76/1.00  
% 0.76/1.00  =========== start of search ===========
% 9.06/9.26  
% 9.06/9.26  
% 9.06/9.26  Changing weight limit from 60 to 31.
% 9.06/9.26  
% 9.06/9.26  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.06/9.26  
% 9.06/9.26  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.06/9.26  
% 9.06/9.26  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.06/9.26  
% 9.06/9.26  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.06/9.26  
% 9.06/9.26  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.06/9.26  
% 9.06/9.26  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.06/9.26  
% 9.06/9.26  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.06/9.26  
% 9.06/9.26  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.06/9.26  
% 9.06/9.26  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.06/9.26  
% 9.06/9.26  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.06/9.26  
% 9.06/9.26  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.06/9.26  
% 9.06/9.26  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.06/9.26  
% 9.06/9.26  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.06/9.26  
% 9.06/9.26  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.06/9.26  
% 9.06/9.26  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.06/9.26  
% 9.06/9.26  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.06/9.26  
% 9.06/9.26  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.06/9.26  
% 9.06/9.26  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.06/9.26  
% 9.06/9.26  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.06/9.26  
% 9.06/9.26  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.06/9.26  
% 9.06/9.26  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.06/9.26  
% 9.06/9.26  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.06/9.26  
% 9.06/9.26  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.06/9.26  
% 9.06/9.26  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.06/9.26  
% 9.06/9.26  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.06/9.26  
% 9.06/9.26  Model 2 [ 48 1 11100 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 9.06/9.26  
% 9.06/9.26  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.06/9.26  
% 9.06/9.26  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.06/9.26  
% 9.06/9.26  Model 3 [ 28 2 11507 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 9.06/9.26  
% 9.06/9.26  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.06/9.26  
% 9.06/9.26  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.06/9.26  
% 9.06/9.26  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.06/9.26  
% 9.06/9.26  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.06/9.26  
% 9.06/9.26  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.06/9.26  
% 9.06/9.26  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.06/9.26  
% 9.06/9.26  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.06/9.26  
% 9.06/9.26  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.06/9.26  
% 9.06/9.26  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.06/9.26  
% 9.06/9.26  Resetting weight limit to 31 after 100 givens.
% 9.06/9.26  
% 9.55/9.73  
% 9.55/9.73  
% 9.55/9.73  Changing weight limit from 31 to 28.
% 9.55/9.73  
% 9.55/9.73  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.55/9.73  
% 9.55/9.73  Resetting weight limit to 28 after 105 givens.
% 9.55/9.73  
% 9.55/9.79  
% 9.55/9.79  
% 9.55/9.79  Changing weight limit from 28 to 20.
% 9.55/9.79  
% 9.55/9.79  Resetting weight limit to 20 after 110 givens.
% 9.55/9.79  
% 9.66/9.86  
% 9.66/9.86  
% 9.66/9.86  Changing weight limit from 20 to 19.
% 9.66/9.86  
% 9.66/9.86  Resetting weight limit to 19 after 115 givens.
% 9.66/9.86  
% 10.03/10.24  
% 10.03/10.24  
% 10.03/10.24  Changing weight limit from 19 to 18.
% 10.03/10.24  
% 10.03/10.24  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 10.03/10.24  
% 10.03/10.24  Resetting weight limit to 18 after 120 givens.
% 10.03/10.24  
% 10.41/10.60  
% 10.41/10.60  
% 10.41/10.60  Changing weight limit from 18 to 17.
% 10.41/10.60  
% 10.41/10.60  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 10.41/10.60  
% 10.41/10.60  Resetting weight limit to 17 after 125 givens.
% 10.41/10.60  
% 10.53/10.71  
% 10.53/10.71  
% 10.53/10.71  Changing weight limit from 17 to 16.
% 10.53/10.71  
% 10.53/10.71  Resetting weight limit to 16 after 130 givens.
% 10.53/10.71  
% 11.84/12.02  
% 11.84/12.02  
% 11.84/12.02  Changing weight limit from 16 to 15.
% 11.84/12.02  
% 11.84/12.02  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 11.84/12.02  
% 11.84/12.02  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 11.84/12.02  
% 11.84/12.02  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 11.84/12.02  
% 11.84/12.02  Model 4 [ 60 3 9046 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 11.84/12.02  
% 11.84/12.02  Resetting weight limit to 15 after 140 givens.
% 11.84/12.02  
% 12.16/12.34  
% 12.16/12.34  
% 12.16/12.34  Changing weight limit from 15 to 14.
% 12.16/12.34  
% 12.16/12.34  Resetting weight limit to 14 after 155 givens.
% 12.16/12.34  
% 12.32/12.50  
% 12.32/12.50  
% 12.32/12.50  Changing weight limit from 14 to 13.
% 12.32/12.50  
% 12.32/12.50  Resetting weight limit to 13 after 170 givens.
% 12.32/12.50  
% 14.67/14.84  
% 14.67/14.84  
% 14.67/14.84  Changing weight limit from 13 to 12.
% 14.67/14.84  
% 14.67/14.84  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 14.67/14.84  
% 14.67/14.84  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 14.67/14.84  
% 14.67/14.84  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 14.67/14.84  
% 14.67/14.84  Resetting weight limit to 12 after 265 givens.
% 14.67/14.84  
% 300.05/300.23  Wow, sos-wrapper got a signal XCPU
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------