TSTP Solution File: SET245-6 by E-SAT---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem  : SET245-6 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:22:32 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.14s 0.43s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.14s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   27 (  14 unt;   4 nHn;  14 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   42 (  17 equ;  16 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   4 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   46 (   8 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(subclass_members,axiom,
    ( member(X3,X2)
    | ~ subclass(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X3,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.rilQs50AZS/E---3.1_18431.p',subclass_members) ).

cnf(class_elements_are_sets,axiom,
    subclass(X1,universal_class),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.rilQs50AZS/E---3.1_18431.p',class_elements_are_sets) ).

cnf(intersection2,axiom,
    ( member(X1,X3)
    | ~ member(X1,intersection(X2,X3)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.rilQs50AZS/E---3.1_18431.p',intersection2) ).

cnf(regularity1,axiom,
    ( X1 = null_class
    | member(regular(X1),X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.rilQs50AZS/E---3.1_18431.p',regularity1) ).

cnf(complement1,axiom,
    ( ~ member(X1,complement(X2))
    | ~ member(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.rilQs50AZS/E---3.1_18431.p',complement1) ).

cnf(restriction2,axiom,
    intersection(cross_product(X1,X2),X3) = restrict(X3,X1,X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.rilQs50AZS/E---3.1_18431.p',restriction2) ).

cnf(restriction1,axiom,
    intersection(X1,cross_product(X2,X3)) = restrict(X1,X2,X3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.rilQs50AZS/E---3.1_18431.p',restriction1) ).

cnf(prove_restriction_with_null_class1_1,negated_conjecture,
    restrict(null_class,x,y) != null_class,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.rilQs50AZS/E---3.1_18431.p',prove_restriction_with_null_class1_1) ).

cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
    ( member(X3,X2)
    | ~ subclass(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X3,X1) ),
    subclass_members ).

cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
    subclass(X1,universal_class),
    class_elements_are_sets ).

cnf(c_0_10,axiom,
    ( member(X1,X3)
    | ~ member(X1,intersection(X2,X3)) ),
    intersection2 ).

cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
    ( X1 = null_class
    | member(regular(X1),X1) ),
    regularity1 ).

cnf(c_0_12,axiom,
    ( ~ member(X1,complement(X2))
    | ~ member(X1,X2) ),
    complement1 ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( member(X1,universal_class)
    | ~ member(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( intersection(X1,X2) = null_class
    | member(regular(intersection(X1,X2)),X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( complement(X1) = null_class
    | ~ member(regular(complement(X1)),X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( X1 = null_class
    | member(regular(X1),universal_class) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,axiom,
    intersection(cross_product(X1,X2),X3) = restrict(X3,X1,X2),
    restriction2 ).

cnf(c_0_18,axiom,
    intersection(X1,cross_product(X2,X3)) = restrict(X1,X2,X3),
    restriction1 ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( intersection(X1,complement(X2)) = null_class
    | ~ member(regular(intersection(X1,complement(X2))),X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    complement(universal_class) = null_class,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    restrict(null_class,x,y) != null_class,
    prove_restriction_with_null_class1_1 ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    intersection(X1,cross_product(X2,X3)) = intersection(cross_product(X2,X3),X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    intersection(X1,null_class) = null_class,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_16]),c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    intersection(null_class,cross_product(x,y)) != null_class,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    intersection(null_class,cross_product(X1,X2)) = null_class,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.09  % Problem    : SET245-6 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.07/0.10  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.09/0.30  % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.30  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.30  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.30  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.09/0.30  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.09/0.30  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.09/0.30  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.09/0.30  % DateTime   : Mon Oct  2 17:38:42 EDT 2023
% 0.09/0.30  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.14/0.40  Running first-order model finding
% 0.14/0.40  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.rilQs50AZS/E---3.1_18431.p
% 0.14/0.43  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.14/0.43  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.43  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.43  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.43  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.43  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.43  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.43  # sh5l with pid 18511 completed with status 0
% 0.14/0.43  # Result found by sh5l
% 0.14/0.43  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.43  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.43  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.43  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.43  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.43  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.43  # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.14/0.43  # Search class: FGHSM-FFMM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.43  # Scheduled 13 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.14/0.43  # Starting G-E--_107_C41_F1_PI_AE_CS_SP_PS_S4S with 23s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.43  # G-E--_107_C41_F1_PI_AE_CS_SP_PS_S4S with pid 18514 completed with status 0
% 0.14/0.43  # Result found by G-E--_107_C41_F1_PI_AE_CS_SP_PS_S4S
% 0.14/0.43  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.43  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.43  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.43  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.43  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.43  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.43  # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.14/0.43  # Search class: FGHSM-FFMM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.43  # Scheduled 13 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.14/0.43  # Starting G-E--_107_C41_F1_PI_AE_CS_SP_PS_S4S with 23s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.43  # Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 0.14/0.43  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.14/0.43  
% 0.14/0.43  # Proof found!
% 0.14/0.43  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.14/0.43  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.14/0.43  # Parsed axioms                        : 113
% 0.14/0.43  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 14
% 0.14/0.43  # Initial clauses                      : 99
% 0.14/0.43  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.14/0.43  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 99
% 0.14/0.43  # Processed clauses                    : 271
% 0.14/0.43  # ...of these trivial                  : 1
% 0.14/0.43  # ...subsumed                          : 6
% 0.14/0.43  # ...remaining for further processing  : 264
% 0.14/0.43  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 2
% 0.14/0.43  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.14/0.43  # Backward-subsumed                    : 1
% 0.14/0.43  # Backward-rewritten                   : 5
% 0.14/0.43  # Generated clauses                    : 528
% 0.14/0.43  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 490
% 0.14/0.43  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.14/0.43  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.14/0.43  # Paramodulations                      : 524
% 0.14/0.43  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.14/0.43  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.14/0.43  # Equation resolutions                 : 4
% 0.14/0.43  # Total rewrite steps                  : 54
% 0.14/0.43  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.14/0.43  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.14/0.43  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.14/0.43  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.14/0.43  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.14/0.43  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.14/0.43  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.14/0.43  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.14/0.43  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.14/0.43  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.14/0.43  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.14/0.43  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.14/0.43  # Current number of processed clauses  : 158
% 0.14/0.43  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 54
% 0.14/0.43  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 0.14/0.43  #    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 0.14/0.43  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 103
% 0.14/0.43  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 416
% 0.14/0.43  # ...number of literals in the above   : 888
% 0.14/0.43  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.14/0.43  # Current number of archived clauses   : 104
% 0.14/0.43  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2649
% 0.14/0.43  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2326
% 0.14/0.43  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 7
% 0.14/0.43  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 437
% 0.14/0.43  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.14/0.43  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 32
% 0.14/0.43  # BW rewrite match successes           : 10
% 0.14/0.43  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.14/0.43  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.14/0.43  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 10152
% 0.14/0.43  
% 0.14/0.43  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.43  # User time                : 0.017 s
% 0.14/0.43  # System time              : 0.004 s
% 0.14/0.43  # Total time               : 0.022 s
% 0.14/0.43  # Maximum resident set size: 1956 pages
% 0.14/0.43  
% 0.14/0.43  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.43  # User time                : 0.019 s
% 0.14/0.43  # System time              : 0.007 s
% 0.14/0.43  # Total time               : 0.026 s
% 0.14/0.43  # Maximum resident set size: 1772 pages
% 0.14/0.43  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------