TSTP Solution File: SET242-6 by CSE_E---1.5
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE_E---1.5
% Problem : SET242-6 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 14:33:44 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.61s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 65
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 72 ( 10 unt; 60 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 16 ( 2 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 11 ( 7 ~; 4 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 72 ( 44 >; 28 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 12 ( 10 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 50 ( 50 usr; 16 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 12 ( 0 sgn; 0 !; 0 ?; 0 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(decl_22,type,
subclass: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(decl_23,type,
member: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(decl_24,type,
not_subclass_element: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_25,type,
universal_class: $i ).
tff(decl_26,type,
unordered_pair: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_27,type,
singleton: $i > $i ).
tff(decl_28,type,
ordered_pair: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_29,type,
cross_product: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_30,type,
first: $i > $i ).
tff(decl_31,type,
second: $i > $i ).
tff(decl_32,type,
element_relation: $i ).
tff(decl_33,type,
intersection: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_34,type,
complement: $i > $i ).
tff(decl_35,type,
union: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_36,type,
symmetric_difference: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_37,type,
restrict: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_38,type,
null_class: $i ).
tff(decl_39,type,
domain_of: $i > $i ).
tff(decl_40,type,
rotate: $i > $i ).
tff(decl_41,type,
flip: $i > $i ).
tff(decl_42,type,
inverse: $i > $i ).
tff(decl_43,type,
range_of: $i > $i ).
tff(decl_44,type,
domain: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_45,type,
range: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_46,type,
image: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_47,type,
successor: $i > $i ).
tff(decl_48,type,
successor_relation: $i ).
tff(decl_49,type,
inductive: $i > $o ).
tff(decl_50,type,
omega: $i ).
tff(decl_51,type,
sum_class: $i > $i ).
tff(decl_52,type,
power_class: $i > $i ).
tff(decl_53,type,
compose: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_54,type,
single_valued_class: $i > $o ).
tff(decl_55,type,
identity_relation: $i ).
tff(decl_56,type,
function: $i > $o ).
tff(decl_57,type,
regular: $i > $i ).
tff(decl_58,type,
apply: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_59,type,
choice: $i ).
tff(decl_60,type,
one_to_one: $i > $o ).
tff(decl_61,type,
subset_relation: $i ).
tff(decl_62,type,
diagonalise: $i > $i ).
tff(decl_63,type,
cantor: $i > $i ).
tff(decl_64,type,
operation: $i > $o ).
tff(decl_65,type,
compatible: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(decl_66,type,
homomorphism: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(decl_67,type,
not_homomorphism1: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_68,type,
not_homomorphism2: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_69,type,
compose_class: $i > $i ).
tff(decl_70,type,
composition_function: $i ).
tff(decl_71,type,
domain_relation: $i ).
tff(decl_72,type,
single_valued1: $i > $i ).
tff(decl_73,type,
single_valued2: $i > $i ).
tff(decl_74,type,
single_valued3: $i > $i ).
tff(decl_75,type,
singleton_relation: $i ).
tff(decl_76,type,
application_function: $i ).
tff(decl_77,type,
maps: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(decl_78,type,
z: $i ).
tff(decl_79,type,
xr: $i ).
tff(decl_80,type,
x: $i ).
tff(decl_81,type,
y: $i ).
cnf(prove_restriction_alternate_defn5_3,negated_conjecture,
~ member(z,restrict(xr,x,y)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_restriction_alternate_defn5_3) ).
cnf(restriction1,axiom,
intersection(X1,cross_product(X2,X3)) = restrict(X1,X2,X3),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',restriction1) ).
cnf(intersection3,axiom,
( member(X1,intersection(X2,X3))
| ~ member(X1,X2)
| ~ member(X1,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',intersection3) ).
cnf(prove_restriction_alternate_defn5_2,negated_conjecture,
member(z,cross_product(x,y)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_restriction_alternate_defn5_2) ).
cnf(prove_restriction_alternate_defn5_1,negated_conjecture,
member(z,xr),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_restriction_alternate_defn5_1) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ member(z,restrict(xr,x,y)),
prove_restriction_alternate_defn5_3 ).
cnf(c_0_6,axiom,
intersection(X1,cross_product(X2,X3)) = restrict(X1,X2,X3),
restriction1 ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ member(z,intersection(xr,cross_product(x,y))),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
( member(X1,intersection(X2,X3))
| ~ member(X1,X2)
| ~ member(X1,X3) ),
intersection3 ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
member(z,cross_product(x,y)),
prove_restriction_alternate_defn5_2 ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
member(z,xr),
prove_restriction_alternate_defn5_1 ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),c_0_9]),c_0_10])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SET242-6 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Sat Aug 26 08:33:53 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.58 start to proof: theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.61 % Version : CSE_E---1.5
% 0.20/0.61 % Problem : theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.61 % Proof found
% 0.20/0.61 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.61 % SZS output start Proof
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.61 % Total time : 0.022000 s
% 0.20/0.61 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.20/0.61 % Total time : 0.027000 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------