TSTP Solution File: SET240-6 by SnakeForV-SAT---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
% Problem  : SET240-6 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 18:24:16 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.78s 0.60s
% Output   : Refutation 1.78s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   13 (  10 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   16 (   4 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    7 (   4   ~;   3   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   11 (  11 usr;   5 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   19 (  19   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f303,plain,
    $false,
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f302,f114]) ).

fof(f114,axiom,
    ~ member(u,x),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_restriction_alternate_defn3_2) ).

fof(f302,plain,
    member(u,x),
    inference(resolution,[],[f159,f192]) ).

fof(f192,plain,
    member(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(u,u),unordered_pair(u,unordered_pair(v,v))),cross_product(x,y)),
    inference(resolution,[],[f21,f134]) ).

fof(f134,plain,
    member(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(u,u),unordered_pair(u,unordered_pair(v,v))),intersection(cross_product(x,y),xr)),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f113,f119,f29]) ).

fof(f29,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X5] : restrict(X5,X0,X1) = intersection(cross_product(X0,X1),X5),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',restriction2) ).

fof(f119,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : ordered_pair(X0,X1) = unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X0,X0),unordered_pair(X0,unordered_pair(X1,X1))),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f13,f12,f12]) ).

fof(f12,axiom,
    ! [X0] : unordered_pair(X0,X0) = singleton(X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',singleton_set) ).

fof(f13,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : unordered_pair(singleton(X0),unordered_pair(X0,singleton(X1))) = ordered_pair(X0,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ordered_pair) ).

fof(f113,axiom,
    member(ordered_pair(u,v),restrict(xr,x,y)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_restriction_alternate_defn3_1) ).

fof(f21,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X4] :
      ( ~ member(X4,intersection(X0,X1))
      | member(X4,X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',intersection1) ).

fof(f159,plain,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ member(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X2,X2),unordered_pair(X2,unordered_pair(X3,X3))),cross_product(X0,X1))
      | member(X2,X0) ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f14,f119]) ).

fof(f14,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ member(ordered_pair(X2,X3),cross_product(X0,X1))
      | member(X2,X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cartesian_product1) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem    : SET240-6 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime   : Tue Aug 30 13:16:01 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.20/0.56  % (6334)dis+21_1:1_av=off:er=filter:slsq=on:slsqc=0:slsqr=1,1:sp=frequency:to=lpo:i=498:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/498Mi)
% 0.20/0.56  % (6316)ott+33_1:4_s2a=on:tgt=ground:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/51Mi)
% 0.20/0.56  % (6326)ins+10_1:1_awrs=decay:awrsf=30:bsr=unit_only:foolp=on:igrr=8/457:igs=10:igwr=on:nwc=1.5:sp=weighted_frequency:to=lpo:uhcvi=on:i=68:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/68Mi)
% 0.20/0.56  % (6315)ott+10_1:32_bd=off:fsr=off:newcnf=on:tgt=full:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/51Mi)
% 0.20/0.56  % (6336)ott+10_1:1_kws=precedence:tgt=ground:i=482:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/482Mi)
% 0.20/0.56  % (6325)ott+10_1:5_bd=off:tgt=full:i=99:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/99Mi)
% 0.20/0.57  % (6312)fmb+10_1:1_bce=on:fmbsr=1.5:nm=4:skr=on:i=191324:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/191324Mi)
% 0.20/0.57  % (6317)dis+34_1:32_abs=on:add=off:bsr=on:gsp=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=48:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/48Mi)
% 0.20/0.57  % (6318)fmb+10_1:1_fmbsr=2.0:nm=4:skr=on:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/51Mi)
% 0.20/0.57  % (6321)ott-1_1:6_av=off:cond=on:fsr=off:nwc=3.0:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/51Mi)
% 0.20/0.58  % (6324)ott+10_1:28_bd=off:bs=on:tgt=ground:i=101:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/101Mi)
% 0.20/0.58  % (6329)fmb+10_1:1_bce=on:i=59:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/59Mi)
% 0.20/0.58  % (6341)ott+10_7:2_awrs=decay:awrsf=8:bd=preordered:drc=off:fd=preordered:fde=unused:fsr=off:slsq=on:slsqc=2:slsqr=5,8:sp=const_min:spb=units:to=lpo:i=355:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/355Mi)
% 0.20/0.58  % (6338)ins+10_1:1_awrs=decay:awrsf=30:bsr=unit_only:foolp=on:igrr=8/457:igs=10:igwr=on:nwc=1.5:sp=weighted_frequency:to=lpo:uhcvi=on:i=68:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/68Mi)
% 0.20/0.59  % (6320)dis+2_1:64_add=large:bce=on:bd=off:i=2:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 0.20/0.59  % (6333)ott+3_1:1_gsp=on:lcm=predicate:i=138:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/138Mi)
% 0.20/0.59  % (6330)ott+10_1:1_tgt=ground:i=100:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/100Mi)
% 1.78/0.59  % (6334)First to succeed.
% 1.78/0.59  % (6328)dis+34_1:32_abs=on:add=off:bsr=on:gsp=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=99:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/99Mi)
% 1.78/0.59  % (6340)ott+33_1:4_s2a=on:tgt=ground:i=439:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/439Mi)
% 1.78/0.59  % (6314)ott+4_1:1_av=off:bd=off:nwc=5.0:s2a=on:s2at=2.0:slsq=on:slsqc=2:slsql=off:slsqr=1,2:sp=frequency:i=37:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/37Mi)
% 1.78/0.59  % (6322)ott+2_1:1_fsr=off:gsp=on:i=50:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/50Mi)
% 1.78/0.59  % (6332)ott+10_1:8_bsd=on:fsd=on:lcm=predicate:nwc=5.0:s2a=on:s2at=1.5:spb=goal_then_units:i=176:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/176Mi)
% 1.78/0.60  % (6334)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 1.78/0.60  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 1.78/0.60  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 1.78/0.60  % (6334)------------------------------
% 1.78/0.60  % (6334)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 1.78/0.60  % (6334)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 1.78/0.60  % (6334)Termination reason: Refutation
% 1.78/0.60  
% 1.78/0.60  % (6334)Memory used [KB]: 1151
% 1.78/0.60  % (6334)Time elapsed: 0.142 s
% 1.78/0.60  % (6334)Instructions burned: 13 (million)
% 1.78/0.60  % (6334)------------------------------
% 1.78/0.60  % (6334)------------------------------
% 1.78/0.60  % (6310)Success in time 0.245 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------