TSTP Solution File: SET238-6 by SNARK---20120808r022

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : SET238-6 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 05:08:32 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.47s 0.64s
% Output   : Refutation 0.47s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   10 (   8 unt;   0 nHn;   9 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   12 (   3 equ;   4 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   4 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    9 (   3 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cartesian_product4,axiom,
    ( ~ member(X,cross_product(Y,Z))
    | ordered_pair(first(X),second(X)) = X ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',cartesian_product4) ).

cnf(intersection2,axiom,
    ( ~ member(X,intersection(Y,Z))
    | member(X,Z) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',intersection2) ).

cnf(restriction1,axiom,
    intersection(X,cross_product(Y,Z)) = restrict(X,Y,Z),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',restriction1) ).

cnf(prove_corollary_to_restriction_alternate_defn1_1,negated_conjecture,
    member(z,restrict(xr,x,y)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_corollary_to_restriction_alternate_defn1_1) ).

cnf(128,plain,
    member(z,intersection(xr,cross_product(x,y))),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[prove_corollary_to_restriction_alternate_defn1_1,restriction1,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(prove_corollary_to_restriction_alternate_defn1_2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ member(ordered_pair(first(z),second(z)),restrict(xr,x,y)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_corollary_to_restriction_alternate_defn1_2) ).

cnf(130,plain,
    ~ member(ordered_pair(first(z),second(z)),intersection(xr,cross_product(x,y))),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[prove_corollary_to_restriction_alternate_defn1_2,restriction1,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(155,plain,
    member(z,cross_product(x,y)),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[intersection2,128]) ).

cnf(555,plain,
    ordered_pair(first(z),second(z)) = z,
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cartesian_product4,155]) ).

cnf(556,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[130,128,555,theory(equality)]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12  % Problem  : SET238-6 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.04/0.13  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 01:14:35 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.47  /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.48  * 
% 0.20/0.48  * 
% 0.20/0.48  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.20/0.48  * 
% 0.20/0.48  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.20/0.48  * 
% 0.20/0.48  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.20/0.48   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.20/0.48   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.20/0.48   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.20/0.48   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.20/0.48   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.20/0.48   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.20/0.48  * 
% 0.20/0.48  "."
% 0.20/0.48  * 
% 0.20/0.48  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-11T01:14:35
% 0.20/0.48  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n014.cluster.edu at 2022-07-11T01:14:35
% 0.47/0.64  
% 0.47/0.64  
% 0.47/0.64  #||
% 0.47/0.64  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.47/0.64  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.47/0.64  ||#
% 0.47/0.64  
% 0.47/0.64  ; Summary of computation:
% 0.47/0.64  ;      1113 formulas have been input or derived (from 129 formulas).
% 0.47/0.64  ;       556 (50%) were retained.  Of these,
% 0.47/0.64  ;           25 ( 4%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.47/0.64  ;          531 (96%) are still being kept.
% 0.47/0.64  ; 
% 0.47/0.64  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.47/0.64  ;     0.021  13%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 0.47/0.64  ;     0.004   3%   Assert                       (114 calls)
% 0.47/0.64  ;     0.039  25%   Process new row              (947 calls)
% 0.47/0.64  ;     0.023  14%   Resolution                   (256 calls)
% 0.47/0.64  ;     0.003   2%   Paramodulation               (128 calls)
% 0.47/0.64  ;     0.000   0%   Factoring                    (3 calls)
% 0.47/0.64  ;     0.002   1%   Condensing                   (240 calls)
% 0.47/0.64  ;     0.008   5%   Forward subsumption          (240 calls)
% 0.47/0.64  ;     0.005   3%   Backward subsumption         (223 calls)
% 0.47/0.64  ;     0.000   0%   Clause clause subsumption    (133 calls)
% 0.47/0.64  ;     0.014   9%   Forward simplification       (947 calls)
% 0.47/0.64  ;     0.006   4%   Backward simplification      (539 calls)
% 0.47/0.64  ;     0.004   3%   Ordering                     (451 calls)
% 0.47/0.64  ;     0.000   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 0.47/0.64  ;     0.000   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 0.47/0.64  ;     0.030  19%   Other
% 0.47/0.64  ;     0.159        Total
% 0.47/0.64  ;     0.161        Real time
% 0.47/0.64  ; 
% 0.47/0.64  ; Term-hash-array has 1,280 terms in all.
% 0.47/0.64  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 223 entries (223 at peak, 223 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.47/0.64  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 1,493 nodes (1,493 at peak, 1,493 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.47/0.64  ;  Retrieved 125 possibly forward subsuming rows in 240 calls.
% 0.47/0.64  ;  Retrieved 39 possibly backward subsumed rows in 223 calls.
% 0.47/0.64  ; Path-index has 1,281 entries (1,295 at peak, 1,296 added, 15 deleted).
% 0.47/0.64  ; Path-index has 3,536 nodes (3,552 at peak, 3,553 added, 17 deleted).
% 0.47/0.64  ; Trie-index has 1,281 entries (1,295 at peak, 1,296 added, 15 deleted).
% 0.47/0.64  ; Trie-index has 4,204 nodes (4,278 at peak, 4,279 added, 75 deleted).
% 0.47/0.64  ; Retrieved 716 generalization terms in 2,355 calls.
% 0.47/0.64  ; Retrieved 339 instance terms in 315 calls.
% 0.47/0.64  ; Retrieved 21,451 unifiable terms in 1,533 calls.
% 0.47/0.64  ; 
% 0.47/0.64  ; The agenda of backward simplifiable rows to process has 6 entries:
% 0.47/0.64  ;     6 with value 0
% 0.47/0.64  ; The agenda of rows to process has 70 entries:
% 0.47/0.64  ;     9 with value 12             16 with value 16               1 with value 18
% 0.47/0.64  ;    18 with value 14              4 with value 17               6 with value 19
% 0.47/0.64  ;    16 with value 15
% 0.47/0.64  ; The agenda of rows to give has 403 entries:
% 0.47/0.64  ;    11 with value (4 8)           7 with value (4 21)           3 with value (4 34)
% 0.47/0.64  ;    17 with value (4 9)           5 with value (4 22)           2 with value (4 37)
% 0.47/0.64  ;    24 with value (4 10)          7 with value (4 23)           1 with value (4 43)
% 0.47/0.64  ;    31 with value (4 11)          5 with value (4 24)           1 with value (4 44)
% 0.47/0.64  ;    27 with value (4 12)          5 with value (4 26)           1 with value (4 45)
% 0.47/0.64  ;    44 with value (4 13)          1 with value (4 27)           4 with value (4 46)
% 0.47/0.64  ;    51 with value (4 14)          2 with value (4 28)           2 with value (4 49)
% 0.47/0.64  ;    42 with value (4 15)          3 with value (4 29)           1 with value (4 51)
% 0.47/0.64  ;    20 with value (4 16)          3 with value (4 30)           1 with value (4 53)
% 0.47/0.64  ;    17 with value (4 17)          1 with value (4 31)           1 with value (4 55)
% 0.47/0.64  ;    31 with value (4 18)          1 with value (4 32)           1 with value (4 59)
% 0.47/0.64  ;    21 with value (4 19)          2 with value (4 33)           1 with value (4 63)
% 0.47/0.64  ;     6 with value (4 20)
% 0.47/0.64  Evaluation took:
% 0.47/0.64    0.161 seconds of real time
% 0.47/0.64    0.147345 seconds of user run time
% 0.47/0.64    0.01422 seconds of system run time
% 0.47/0.64    0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.47/0.64    0 page faults and
% 0.47/0.64    9,927,664 bytes consed.
% 0.47/0.64  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.47/0.64  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-11T01:14:35
% 0.47/0.64  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.47/0.64  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------