TSTP Solution File: SET236-6 by SnakeForV---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SnakeForV---1.0
% Problem  : SET236-6 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 18:19:53 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.21s 0.49s
% Output   : Refutation 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   14 (   8 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   21 (   1 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   17 (  10   ~;   7   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   15 (  15   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f157,plain,
    $false,
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f152,f118]) ).

fof(f118,plain,
    member(not_subclass_element(x,y),x),
    inference(resolution,[],[f115,f2]) ).

fof(f2,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( subclass(X0,X1)
      | member(not_subclass_element(X0,X1),X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',not_subclass_members1) ).

fof(f115,axiom,
    ~ subclass(x,y),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_cross_product_property11_3) ).

fof(f152,plain,
    ~ member(not_subclass_element(x,y),x),
    inference(resolution,[],[f120,f137]) ).

fof(f137,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : ~ member(not_subclass_element(x,y),cross_product(X0,X1)),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f136,f119]) ).

fof(f119,plain,
    ~ member(not_subclass_element(x,y),y),
    inference(resolution,[],[f115,f3]) ).

fof(f3,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( subclass(X0,X1)
      | ~ member(not_subclass_element(X0,X1),X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',not_subclass_members2) ).

fof(f136,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( member(not_subclass_element(x,y),y)
      | ~ member(not_subclass_element(x,y),cross_product(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f114,f17]) ).

fof(f17,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X4] :
      ( ordered_pair(first(X4),second(X4)) = X4
      | ~ member(X4,cross_product(X0,X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cartesian_product4) ).

fof(f114,axiom,
    member(ordered_pair(first(not_subclass_element(x,y)),second(not_subclass_element(x,y))),y),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_cross_product_property11_2) ).

fof(f120,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( member(X0,cross_product(universal_class,universal_class))
      | ~ member(X0,x) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f113,f1]) ).

fof(f1,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ member(X2,X0)
      | ~ subclass(X0,X1)
      | member(X2,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',subclass_members) ).

fof(f113,axiom,
    subclass(x,cross_product(universal_class,universal_class)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_cross_product_property11_1) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem    : SET236-6 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime   : Tue Aug 30 13:42:06 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.21/0.48  % (19066)lrs+1011_1:1_atotf=0.0306256:ep=RST:mep=off:nm=0:sos=all:i=3:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/3Mi)
% 0.21/0.48  % (19088)lrs+10_1:1_sos=all:ss=axioms:st=1.5:i=20:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/20Mi)
% 0.21/0.49  % (19088)First to succeed.
% 0.21/0.49  % (19066)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.21/0.49  % (19066)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.49  % (19066)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.21/0.49  % (19066)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.21/0.49  % (19066)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.21/0.49  % (19066)Termination phase: Property scanning
% 0.21/0.49  
% 0.21/0.49  % (19066)Memory used [KB]: 1407
% 0.21/0.49  % (19066)Time elapsed: 0.005 s
% 0.21/0.49  % (19066)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.21/0.49  % (19066)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.49  % (19066)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.49  % (19088)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.21/0.49  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.21/0.49  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.49  % (19088)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.49  % (19088)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.21/0.49  % (19088)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.21/0.49  % (19088)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.21/0.49  
% 0.21/0.49  % (19088)Memory used [KB]: 6012
% 0.21/0.49  % (19088)Time elapsed: 0.076 s
% 0.21/0.49  % (19088)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.21/0.49  % (19088)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.49  % (19088)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.49  % (19047)Success in time 0.139 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------