TSTP Solution File: SET200+3 by SATCoP---0.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SATCoP---0.1
% Problem : SET200+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : satcop --statistics %s
% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 04:59:57 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.22s 0.42s
% Output : Proof 0.22s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (MakeTreeStats fails)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(g0,plain,
subset(sK2,sK3),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_th34)]) ).
cnf(g1,plain,
subset(sK4,sK5),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_th34)]) ).
cnf(g2,plain,
~ subset(union(sK2,sK4),union(sK3,sK5)),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_th34)]) ).
cnf(g3,plain,
( member(sK0(union(sK2,sK4),union(sK3,sK5)),union(sK2,sK4))
| subset(union(sK2,sK4),union(sK3,sK5)) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',subset_defn)]) ).
cnf(g4,plain,
( ~ member(sK0(union(sK2,sK4),union(sK3,sK5)),union(sK3,sK5))
| subset(union(sK2,sK4),union(sK3,sK5)) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',subset_defn)]) ).
cnf(g5,plain,
( ~ member(sK0(union(sK2,sK4),union(sK3,sK5)),sK3)
| member(sK0(union(sK2,sK4),union(sK3,sK5)),union(sK3,sK5)) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',union_defn)]) ).
cnf(g6,plain,
( ~ member(sK0(union(sK2,sK4),union(sK3,sK5)),sK5)
| member(sK0(union(sK2,sK4),union(sK3,sK5)),union(sK3,sK5)) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',union_defn)]) ).
cnf(g7,plain,
sPE(union(sK2,sK4),union(sK4,sK2)),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commutativity_of_union)]) ).
cnf(g8,plain,
sPE(sK0(union(sK2,sK4),union(sK3,sK5)),sK0(union(sK2,sK4),union(sK3,sK5))),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(g9,plain,
( ~ sPE(sK0(union(sK2,sK4),union(sK3,sK5)),sK0(union(sK2,sK4),union(sK3,sK5)))
| ~ sPE(union(sK2,sK4),union(sK4,sK2))
| ~ member(sK0(union(sK2,sK4),union(sK3,sK5)),union(sK2,sK4))
| member(sK0(union(sK2,sK4),union(sK3,sK5)),union(sK4,sK2)) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(g10,plain,
( ~ member(sK0(union(sK2,sK4),union(sK3,sK5)),union(sK4,sK2))
| member(sK0(union(sK2,sK4),union(sK3,sK5)),sK4)
| member(sK0(union(sK2,sK4),union(sK3,sK5)),sK2) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',union_defn)]) ).
cnf(g11,plain,
( ~ member(sK0(union(sK2,sK4),union(sK3,sK5)),sK4)
| ~ subset(sK4,sK5)
| member(sK0(union(sK2,sK4),union(sK3,sK5)),sK5) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',subset_defn)]) ).
cnf(g12,plain,
( ~ member(sK0(union(sK2,sK4),union(sK3,sK5)),sK2)
| ~ subset(sK2,sK3)
| member(sK0(union(sK2,sK4),union(sK3,sK5)),sK3) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',subset_defn)]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.14 % Problem : SET200+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.04/0.14 % Command : satcop --statistics %s
% 0.15/0.36 % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.15/0.36 % DateTime : Sun Jul 10 22:54:15 EDT 2022
% 0.15/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.22/0.42 % symbols: 12
% 0.22/0.42 % clauses: 26
% 0.22/0.42 % start clauses: 3
% 0.22/0.42 % iterative deepening steps: 272
% 0.22/0.42 % maximum path limit: 4
% 0.22/0.42 % literal attempts: 70098
% 0.22/0.42 % depth failures: 53832
% 0.22/0.42 % regularity failures: 2136
% 0.22/0.42 % tautology failures: 2495
% 0.22/0.42 % reductions: 345
% 0.22/0.42 % extensions: 69201
% 0.22/0.42 % SAT variables: 6227
% 0.22/0.42 % SAT clauses: 10335
% 0.22/0.42 % WalkSAT solutions: 10330
% 0.22/0.42 % CDCL solutions: 0
% 0.22/0.42 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.22/0.42 % SZS output start ListOfCNF for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------