TSTP Solution File: SET200+3 by ET---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : SET200+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 00:50:04 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.22s 1.42s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.22s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   45 (  11 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  116 (  19 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   12 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  108 (  37   ~;  53   |;  11   &)
%                                         (   4 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   13 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  108 (  13 sgn  38   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(prove_th34,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2,X3,X4] :
      ( ( subset(X1,X2)
        & subset(X3,X4) )
     => subset(union(X1,X3),union(X2,X4)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',prove_th34) ).

fof(subset_defn,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( subset(X1,X2)
    <=> ! [X3] :
          ( member(X3,X1)
         => member(X3,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',subset_defn) ).

fof(union_defn,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( member(X3,union(X1,X2))
    <=> ( member(X3,X1)
        | member(X3,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',union_defn) ).

fof(equal_member_defn,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( X1 = X2
    <=> ! [X3] :
          ( member(X3,X1)
        <=> member(X3,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',equal_member_defn) ).

fof(commutativity_of_union,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : union(X1,X2) = union(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',commutativity_of_union) ).

fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2,X3,X4] :
        ( ( subset(X1,X2)
          & subset(X3,X4) )
       => subset(union(X1,X3),union(X2,X4)) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_th34]) ).

fof(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X4,X5,X6,X4,X5] :
      ( ( ~ subset(X4,X5)
        | ~ member(X6,X4)
        | member(X6,X5) )
      & ( member(esk5_2(X4,X5),X4)
        | subset(X4,X5) )
      & ( ~ member(esk5_2(X4,X5),X5)
        | subset(X4,X5) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[subset_defn])])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X4,X5,X6,X4,X5,X6] :
      ( ( ~ member(X6,union(X4,X5))
        | member(X6,X4)
        | member(X6,X5) )
      & ( ~ member(X6,X4)
        | member(X6,union(X4,X5)) )
      & ( ~ member(X6,X5)
        | member(X6,union(X4,X5)) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[union_defn])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ( subset(esk1_0,esk2_0)
    & subset(esk3_0,esk4_0)
    & ~ subset(union(esk1_0,esk3_0),union(esk2_0,esk4_0)) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( subset(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(esk5_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( member(X1,union(X2,X3))
    | ~ member(X1,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( member(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X1,X3)
    | ~ subset(X3,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    subset(esk1_0,esk2_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

fof(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X4,X5,X6,X6,X4,X5] :
      ( ( ~ member(X6,X4)
        | member(X6,X5)
        | X4 != X5 )
      & ( ~ member(X6,X5)
        | member(X6,X4)
        | X4 != X5 )
      & ( ~ member(esk6_2(X4,X5),X4)
        | ~ member(esk6_2(X4,X5),X5)
        | X4 = X5 )
      & ( member(esk6_2(X4,X5),X4)
        | member(esk6_2(X4,X5),X5)
        | X4 = X5 ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[equal_member_defn])])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( subset(X1,union(X2,X3))
    | ~ member(esk5_2(X1,union(X2,X3)),X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ( member(X1,esk2_0)
    | ~ member(X1,esk1_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( member(X1,X2)
    | member(X1,X3)
    | ~ member(X1,union(X3,X2)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | member(esk6_2(X1,X2),X2)
    | member(esk6_2(X1,X2),X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    ( subset(X1,union(X2,esk2_0))
    | ~ member(esk5_2(X1,union(X2,esk2_0)),esk1_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( subset(X1,X2)
    | member(esk5_2(X1,X2),X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ~ member(esk6_2(X1,X2),X2)
    | ~ member(esk6_2(X1,X2),X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( member(X1,union(X2,X3))
    | ~ member(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( X1 = union(X2,X3)
    | member(esk6_2(X1,union(X2,X3)),X1)
    | member(esk6_2(X1,union(X2,X3)),X2)
    | member(esk6_2(X1,union(X2,X3)),X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    subset(esk1_0,union(X1,esk2_0)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( X1 = union(X2,X3)
    | ~ member(esk6_2(X1,union(X2,X3)),X1)
    | ~ member(esk6_2(X1,union(X2,X3)),X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( union(X1,X2) = X1
    | member(esk6_2(X1,union(X1,X2)),X2)
    | member(esk6_2(X1,union(X1,X2)),X1) ),
    inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).

fof(c_0_26,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] : union(X3,X4) = union(X4,X3),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[commutativity_of_union]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    subset(esk3_0,esk4_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    ( X1 = union(X2,X3)
    | ~ member(esk6_2(X1,union(X2,X3)),X1)
    | ~ member(esk6_2(X1,union(X2,X3)),X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    ( member(X1,union(X2,esk2_0))
    | ~ member(X1,esk1_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    ( union(X1,X2) = X1
    | member(esk6_2(X1,union(X1,X2)),X2) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]),c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    union(X1,X2) = union(X2,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    ( subset(X1,union(X2,union(X3,X4)))
    | ~ member(esk5_2(X1,union(X2,union(X3,X4))),X4) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    ( member(X1,esk4_0)
    | ~ member(X1,esk3_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    ( subset(X1,union(X2,X3))
    | ~ member(esk5_2(X1,union(X2,X3)),X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    ( subset(union(X1,X2),X3)
    | member(esk5_2(union(X1,X2),X3),X1)
    | member(esk5_2(union(X1,X2),X3),X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
    ( union(X1,esk2_0) = union(X2,X3)
    | ~ member(esk6_2(union(X1,esk2_0),union(X2,X3)),esk1_0)
    | ~ member(esk6_2(union(X1,esk2_0),union(X2,X3)),X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    ( union(X1,X2) = X2
    | member(esk6_2(X2,union(X1,X2)),X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
    ( subset(X1,union(X2,union(X3,esk4_0)))
    | ~ member(esk5_2(X1,union(X2,union(X3,esk4_0))),esk3_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,plain,
    ( subset(union(X1,X2),union(X2,X3))
    | member(esk5_2(union(X1,X2),union(X2,X3)),X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
    union(esk1_0,union(X1,esk2_0)) = union(X1,esk2_0),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_30]),c_0_31]),c_0_31]),c_0_37]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
    subset(union(esk3_0,X1),union(X1,union(X2,esk4_0))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_39]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,negated_conjecture,
    union(esk1_0,union(esk2_0,X1)) = union(esk2_0,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,negated_conjecture,
    ~ subset(union(esk1_0,esk3_0),union(esk2_0,esk4_0)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_42]),c_0_31]),c_0_43]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : SET200+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Sun Jul 10 22:56:52 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.22/1.42  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.22/1.42  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.22/1.42  # Preprocessing time       : 0.015 s
% 0.22/1.42  
% 0.22/1.42  # Proof found!
% 0.22/1.42  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.22/1.42  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.22/1.42  # Proof object total steps             : 45
% 0.22/1.42  # Proof object clause steps            : 34
% 0.22/1.42  # Proof object formula steps           : 11
% 0.22/1.42  # Proof object conjectures             : 17
% 0.22/1.42  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 14
% 0.22/1.42  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 0.22/1.42  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 12
% 0.22/1.42  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 5
% 0.22/1.42  # Proof object generating inferences   : 22
% 0.22/1.42  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 6
% 0.22/1.42  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.22/1.42  # Parsed axioms                        : 6
% 0.22/1.42  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.22/1.42  # Initial clauses                      : 15
% 0.22/1.42  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 2
% 0.22/1.42  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 13
% 0.22/1.42  # Processed clauses                    : 771
% 0.22/1.42  # ...of these trivial                  : 73
% 0.22/1.42  # ...subsumed                          : 528
% 0.22/1.42  # ...remaining for further processing  : 169
% 0.22/1.42  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.22/1.42  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.22/1.42  # Backward-subsumed                    : 3
% 0.22/1.42  # Backward-rewritten                   : 5
% 0.22/1.42  # Generated clauses                    : 1744
% 0.22/1.42  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 1329
% 0.22/1.42  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 35
% 0.22/1.42  # Paramodulations                      : 1720
% 0.22/1.42  # Factorizations                       : 24
% 0.22/1.42  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.22/1.42  # Current number of processed clauses  : 161
% 0.22/1.42  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 50
% 0.22/1.42  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 0.22/1.42  #    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.22/1.42  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 109
% 0.22/1.42  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 546
% 0.22/1.42  # ...number of literals in the above   : 1191
% 0.22/1.42  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.22/1.42  # Current number of archived clauses   : 8
% 0.22/1.42  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 6673
% 0.22/1.42  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 6537
% 0.22/1.42  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 566
% 0.22/1.42  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 124
% 0.22/1.42  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.22/1.42  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 105
% 0.22/1.42  # BW rewrite match successes           : 7
% 0.22/1.42  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.22/1.42  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.22/1.42  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 20711
% 0.22/1.42  
% 0.22/1.42  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/1.42  # User time                : 0.053 s
% 0.22/1.42  # System time              : 0.002 s
% 0.22/1.42  # Total time               : 0.055 s
% 0.22/1.42  # Maximum resident set size: 3816 pages
% 0.22/23.42  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.22/23.43  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.43  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.43  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.43  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.44  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.44  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.44  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.44  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.45  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.45  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.45  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.45  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.45  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.45  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.47  eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------