TSTP Solution File: SET199+3 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : SET199+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 00:10:21 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 7.18s 2.33s
% Output : CNFRefutation 7.18s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 21 ( 10 unt; 2 nHn; 19 RR)
% Number of literals : 36 ( 0 equ; 18 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 22 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_13,negated_conjecture,
~ subset(esk3_0,intersection(esk4_0,esk5_0)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-wbgb1awv/input.p',i_0_13) ).
cnf(i_0_4,plain,
( subset(X1,X2)
| ~ member(esk1_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-wbgb1awv/input.p',i_0_4) ).
cnf(i_0_1,plain,
( member(X1,intersection(X2,X3))
| ~ member(X1,X3)
| ~ member(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-wbgb1awv/input.p',i_0_1) ).
cnf(i_0_6,plain,
( member(X1,X2)
| ~ member(X1,X3)
| ~ subset(X3,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-wbgb1awv/input.p',i_0_6) ).
cnf(i_0_14,negated_conjecture,
subset(esk3_0,esk5_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-wbgb1awv/input.p',i_0_14) ).
cnf(i_0_5,plain,
( subset(X1,X2)
| member(esk1_2(X1,X2),X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-wbgb1awv/input.p',i_0_5) ).
cnf(i_0_15,negated_conjecture,
subset(esk3_0,esk4_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-wbgb1awv/input.p',i_0_15) ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
~ subset(esk3_0,intersection(esk4_0,esk5_0)),
i_0_13 ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( subset(X1,X2)
| ~ member(esk1_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
i_0_4 ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
~ member(esk1_2(esk3_0,intersection(esk4_0,esk5_0)),intersection(esk4_0,esk5_0)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
( member(X1,intersection(X2,X3))
| ~ member(X1,X3)
| ~ member(X1,X2) ),
i_0_1 ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
( member(X1,X2)
| ~ member(X1,X3)
| ~ subset(X3,X2) ),
i_0_6 ).
cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
subset(esk3_0,esk5_0),
i_0_14 ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
( subset(X1,X2)
| member(esk1_2(X1,X2),X1) ),
i_0_5 ).
cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
( ~ member(esk1_2(esk3_0,intersection(esk4_0,esk5_0)),esk5_0)
| ~ member(esk1_2(esk3_0,intersection(esk4_0,esk5_0)),esk4_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
( member(X1,esk5_0)
| ~ member(X1,esk3_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
member(esk1_2(esk3_0,intersection(esk4_0,esk5_0)),esk3_0),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_29]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
subset(esk3_0,esk4_0),
i_0_15 ).
cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
~ member(esk1_2(esk3_0,intersection(esk4_0,esk5_0)),esk4_0),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]),c_0_32])]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
( member(X1,esk4_0)
| ~ member(X1,esk3_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_33]) ).
cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]),c_0_32])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12 % Problem : SET199+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.10/0.13 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Sun Jul 10 01:56:39 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.46 # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 7.18/2.33 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule:
% 7.18/2.33 # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.18/2.33 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.18/2.33 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S04CA
% 7.18/2.33 # and selection function MSelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 7.18/2.33 #
% 7.18/2.33 # Preprocessing time : 0.012 s
% 7.18/2.33 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 7.18/2.33
% 7.18/2.33 # Proof found!
% 7.18/2.33 # SZS status Theorem
% 7.18/2.33 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.18/2.33 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.18/2.33
% 7.18/2.33 # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.18/2.33 # User time : 0.018 s
% 7.18/2.33 # System time : 0.003 s
% 7.18/2.33 # Total time : 0.021 s
% 7.18/2.33 # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 7.18/2.33
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------