TSTP Solution File: SET197-6 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : SET197-6 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:18:51 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 62.45s 31.58s
% Output : CNFRefutation 62.45s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 11 ( 4 unt; 3 nHn; 7 RR)
% Number of literals : 18 ( 0 equ; 6 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 19 ( 3 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(intersection2,axiom,
( member(X1,X3)
| ~ member(X1,intersection(X2,X3)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.y0huxYFtDP/E---3.1_562.p',intersection2) ).
cnf(not_subclass_members1,axiom,
( member(not_subclass_element(X1,X2),X1)
| subclass(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.y0huxYFtDP/E---3.1_562.p',not_subclass_members1) ).
cnf(not_subclass_members2,axiom,
( subclass(X1,X2)
| ~ member(not_subclass_element(X1,X2),X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.y0huxYFtDP/E---3.1_562.p',not_subclass_members2) ).
cnf(prove_lattice_lower_bound2_1,negated_conjecture,
~ subclass(intersection(x,y),y),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.y0huxYFtDP/E---3.1_562.p',prove_lattice_lower_bound2_1) ).
cnf(c_0_4,axiom,
( member(X1,X3)
| ~ member(X1,intersection(X2,X3)) ),
intersection2 ).
cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
( member(not_subclass_element(X1,X2),X1)
| subclass(X1,X2) ),
not_subclass_members1 ).
cnf(c_0_6,axiom,
( subclass(X1,X2)
| ~ member(not_subclass_element(X1,X2),X2) ),
not_subclass_members2 ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( member(not_subclass_element(intersection(X1,X2),X3),X2)
| subclass(intersection(X1,X2),X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
~ subclass(intersection(x,y),y),
prove_lattice_lower_bound2_1 ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
subclass(intersection(X1,X2),X2),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.02/0.12 % Problem : SET197-6 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.12/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 17:43:33 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.46 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.18/0.46 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.y0huxYFtDP/E---3.1_562.p
% 62.45/31.58 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 62.45/31.58 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 62.45/31.58 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 62.45/31.58 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 62.45/31.58 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 62.45/31.58 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 62.45/31.58 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 62.45/31.58 # sh5l with pid 661 completed with status 0
% 62.45/31.58 # Result found by sh5l
% 62.45/31.58 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 62.45/31.58 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 62.45/31.58 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 62.45/31.58 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 62.45/31.58 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 62.45/31.58 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 62.45/31.58 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 62.45/31.58 # Search class: FGHSM-FFMM31-MFFFFFNN
% 62.45/31.58 # Scheduled 13 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 62.45/31.58 # Starting G-E--_107_C41_F1_PI_AE_CS_SP_PS_S4S with 23s (1) cores
% 62.45/31.58 # G-E--_107_C41_F1_PI_AE_CS_SP_PS_S4S with pid 664 completed with status 0
% 62.45/31.58 # Result found by G-E--_107_C41_F1_PI_AE_CS_SP_PS_S4S
% 62.45/31.58 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 62.45/31.58 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 62.45/31.58 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 62.45/31.58 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 62.45/31.58 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 62.45/31.58 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 62.45/31.58 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 62.45/31.58 # Search class: FGHSM-FFMM31-MFFFFFNN
% 62.45/31.58 # Scheduled 13 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 62.45/31.58 # Starting G-E--_107_C41_F1_PI_AE_CS_SP_PS_S4S with 23s (1) cores
% 62.45/31.58 # Preprocessing time : 0.003 s
% 62.45/31.58 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 62.45/31.58
% 62.45/31.58 # Proof found!
% 62.45/31.58 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 62.45/31.58 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 62.45/31.58 # Parsed axioms : 113
% 62.45/31.58 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 15
% 62.45/31.58 # Initial clauses : 98
% 62.45/31.58 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 62.45/31.58 # Initial clauses in saturation : 98
% 62.45/31.58 # Processed clauses : 320
% 62.45/31.58 # ...of these trivial : 6
% 62.45/31.58 # ...subsumed : 24
% 62.45/31.58 # ...remaining for further processing : 290
% 62.45/31.58 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 2
% 62.45/31.58 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 62.45/31.58 # Backward-subsumed : 6
% 62.45/31.58 # Backward-rewritten : 6
% 62.45/31.58 # Generated clauses : 756
% 62.45/31.58 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 652
% 62.45/31.58 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 62.45/31.58 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 62.45/31.58 # Paramodulations : 752
% 62.45/31.58 # Factorizations : 0
% 62.45/31.58 # NegExts : 0
% 62.45/31.58 # Equation resolutions : 4
% 62.45/31.58 # Total rewrite steps : 181
% 62.45/31.58 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 62.45/31.58 # Propositional check models : 0
% 62.45/31.58 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 62.45/31.58 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 62.45/31.58 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 62.45/31.58 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 62.45/31.58 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 62.45/31.58 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 62.45/31.58 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 62.45/31.58 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 62.45/31.58 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 62.45/31.58 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 62.45/31.58 # Current number of processed clauses : 179
% 62.45/31.58 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 74
% 62.45/31.58 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 62.45/31.58 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 62.45/31.58 # Non-unit-clauses : 103
% 62.45/31.58 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 518
% 62.45/31.58 # ...number of literals in the above : 1073
% 62.45/31.58 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 62.45/31.58 # Current number of archived clauses : 109
% 62.45/31.58 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2827
% 62.45/31.58 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2483
% 62.45/31.58 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 9
% 62.45/31.58 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 761
% 62.45/31.58 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 62.45/31.58 # BW rewrite match attempts : 45
% 62.45/31.58 # BW rewrite match successes : 10
% 62.45/31.58 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 62.45/31.58 # Condensation successes : 0
% 62.45/31.58 # Termbank termtop insertions : 12732
% 62.45/31.58
% 62.45/31.58 # -------------------------------------------------
% 62.45/31.58 # User time : 0.023 s
% 62.45/31.58 # System time : 0.002 s
% 62.45/31.58 # Total time : 0.025 s
% 62.45/31.58 # Maximum resident set size: 1960 pages
% 62.45/31.58
% 62.45/31.58 # -------------------------------------------------
% 62.45/31.58 # User time : 0.026 s
% 62.45/31.58 # System time : 0.002 s
% 62.45/31.58 # Total time : 0.029 s
% 62.45/31.58 # Maximum resident set size: 1772 pages
% 62.45/31.58 % E---3.1 exiting
% 62.45/31.59 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------