TSTP Solution File: SET194+3 by iProver---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9
% Problem : SET194+3 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 14:34:04 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.46s 1.15s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.46s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named definition)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,axiom,
! [X0,X1,X2] :
( member(X2,union(X0,X1))
<=> ( member(X2,X1)
| member(X2,X0) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',union_defn) ).
fof(f2,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( subset(X0,X1)
<=> ! [X2] :
( member(X2,X0)
=> member(X2,X1) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',subset_defn) ).
fof(f6,conjecture,
! [X0,X1] : subset(X0,union(X0,X1)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_subset_of_union) ).
fof(f7,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X0,X1] : subset(X0,union(X0,X1)),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f6]) ).
fof(f8,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( subset(X0,X1)
<=> ! [X2] :
( member(X2,X1)
| ~ member(X2,X0) ) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).
fof(f9,plain,
? [X0,X1] : ~ subset(X0,union(X0,X1)),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).
fof(f10,plain,
! [X0,X1,X2] :
( ( member(X2,union(X0,X1))
| ( ~ member(X2,X1)
& ~ member(X2,X0) ) )
& ( member(X2,X1)
| member(X2,X0)
| ~ member(X2,union(X0,X1)) ) ),
inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).
fof(f11,plain,
! [X0,X1,X2] :
( ( member(X2,union(X0,X1))
| ( ~ member(X2,X1)
& ~ member(X2,X0) ) )
& ( member(X2,X1)
| member(X2,X0)
| ~ member(X2,union(X0,X1)) ) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f10]) ).
fof(f12,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ( subset(X0,X1)
| ? [X2] :
( ~ member(X2,X1)
& member(X2,X0) ) )
& ( ! [X2] :
( member(X2,X1)
| ~ member(X2,X0) )
| ~ subset(X0,X1) ) ),
inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).
fof(f13,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ( subset(X0,X1)
| ? [X2] :
( ~ member(X2,X1)
& member(X2,X0) ) )
& ( ! [X3] :
( member(X3,X1)
| ~ member(X3,X0) )
| ~ subset(X0,X1) ) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f12]) ).
fof(f14,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ? [X2] :
( ~ member(X2,X1)
& member(X2,X0) )
=> ( ~ member(sK0(X0,X1),X1)
& member(sK0(X0,X1),X0) ) ),
introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).
fof(f15,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ( subset(X0,X1)
| ( ~ member(sK0(X0,X1),X1)
& member(sK0(X0,X1),X0) ) )
& ( ! [X3] :
( member(X3,X1)
| ~ member(X3,X0) )
| ~ subset(X0,X1) ) ),
inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0])],[f13,f14]) ).
fof(f20,plain,
( ? [X0,X1] : ~ subset(X0,union(X0,X1))
=> ~ subset(sK2,union(sK2,sK3)) ),
introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).
fof(f21,plain,
~ subset(sK2,union(sK2,sK3)),
inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK2,sK3])],[f9,f20]) ).
fof(f23,plain,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( member(X2,union(X0,X1))
| ~ member(X2,X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11]) ).
fof(f26,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( subset(X0,X1)
| member(sK0(X0,X1),X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f15]) ).
fof(f27,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( subset(X0,X1)
| ~ member(sK0(X0,X1),X1) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f15]) ).
fof(f34,plain,
~ subset(sK2,union(sK2,sK3)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f21]) ).
cnf(c_50,plain,
( ~ member(X0,X1)
| member(X0,union(X1,X2)) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f23]) ).
cnf(c_52,plain,
( ~ member(sK0(X0,X1),X1)
| subset(X0,X1) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f27]) ).
cnf(c_53,plain,
( member(sK0(X0,X1),X0)
| subset(X0,X1) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f26]) ).
cnf(c_59,negated_conjecture,
~ subset(sK2,union(sK2,sK3)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f34]) ).
cnf(c_204,plain,
union(sK2,sK3) = sP0_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_205,negated_conjecture,
~ subset(sK2,sP0_iProver_def),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_59,c_204]) ).
cnf(c_402,plain,
( ~ member(X0,sK2)
| member(X0,sP0_iProver_def) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_204,c_50]) ).
cnf(c_508,plain,
( member(sK0(sK2,X0),sP0_iProver_def)
| subset(sK2,X0) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_53,c_402]) ).
cnf(c_526,plain,
subset(sK2,sP0_iProver_def),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_508,c_52]) ).
cnf(c_527,plain,
$false,
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_526,c_205]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : SET194+3 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.06/0.12 % Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sun Jun 23 14:39:24 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.46 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.19/0.46 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --heuristic_context casc_unsat --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.46/1.15 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 0.46/1.15 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.46/1.15
% 0.46/1.15 %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 0.46/1.15
% 0.46/1.15 ------ iProver source info
% 0.46/1.15
% 0.46/1.15 git: date: 2024-06-12 09:56:46 +0000
% 0.46/1.15 git: sha1: 4869ab62f0a3398f9d3a35e6db7918ebd3847e49
% 0.46/1.15 git: non_committed_changes: false
% 0.46/1.15
% 0.46/1.15 ------ Parsing...
% 0.46/1.15 ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel & Parsing by iProver...
% 0.46/1.15
% 0.46/1.15 ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e
% 0.46/1.15
% 0.46/1.15 ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e
% 0.46/1.15
% 0.46/1.15 ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 0.46/1.15 ------ Proving...
% 0.46/1.15 ------ Problem Properties
% 0.46/1.15
% 0.46/1.15
% 0.46/1.15 clauses 12
% 0.46/1.15 conjectures 1
% 0.46/1.15 EPR 3
% 0.46/1.15 Horn 9
% 0.46/1.15 unary 4
% 0.46/1.15 binary 4
% 0.46/1.15 lits 24
% 0.46/1.15 lits eq 4
% 0.46/1.15 fd_pure 0
% 0.46/1.15 fd_pseudo 0
% 0.46/1.15 fd_cond 0
% 0.46/1.15 fd_pseudo_cond 2
% 0.46/1.15 AC symbols 0
% 0.46/1.15
% 0.46/1.15 ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on
% 0.46/1.15
% 0.46/1.15 ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 0.46/1.15
% 0.46/1.15
% 0.46/1.15 ------
% 0.46/1.15 Current options:
% 0.46/1.15 ------
% 0.46/1.15
% 0.46/1.15
% 0.46/1.15
% 0.46/1.15
% 0.46/1.15 ------ Proving...
% 0.46/1.15
% 0.46/1.15
% 0.46/1.15 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.46/1.15
% 0.46/1.15 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 0.46/1.15
% 0.46/1.15
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------