TSTP Solution File: SET194+3 by CSE_E---1.5
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE_E---1.5
% Problem : SET194+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 14:33:33 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.18s 0.57s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.18s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 11
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 25 ( 10 unt; 7 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 38 ( 3 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 32 ( 12 ~; 13 |; 4 &)
% ( 2 <=>; 1 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 10 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 10 ( 5 >; 5 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 38 ( 3 sgn; 22 !; 0 ?; 0 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(decl_22,type,
union: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_23,type,
member: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(decl_24,type,
subset: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(decl_25,type,
esk1_2: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_26,type,
esk2_2: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_27,type,
esk3_0: $i ).
tff(decl_28,type,
esk4_0: $i ).
fof(subset_defn,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( subset(X1,X2)
<=> ! [X3] :
( member(X3,X1)
=> member(X3,X2) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',subset_defn) ).
fof(union_defn,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( member(X3,union(X1,X2))
<=> ( member(X3,X1)
| member(X3,X2) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',union_defn) ).
fof(prove_subset_of_union,conjecture,
! [X1,X2] : subset(X1,union(X1,X2)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_subset_of_union) ).
fof(commutativity_of_union,axiom,
! [X1,X2] : union(X1,X2) = union(X2,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commutativity_of_union) ).
fof(c_0_4,plain,
! [X7,X8,X9,X10,X11] :
( ( ~ subset(X7,X8)
| ~ member(X9,X7)
| member(X9,X8) )
& ( member(esk1_2(X10,X11),X10)
| subset(X10,X11) )
& ( ~ member(esk1_2(X10,X11),X11)
| subset(X10,X11) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[subset_defn])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X4,X5,X6] :
( ( ~ member(X6,union(X4,X5))
| member(X6,X4)
| member(X6,X5) )
& ( ~ member(X6,X4)
| member(X6,union(X4,X5)) )
& ( ~ member(X6,X5)
| member(X6,union(X4,X5)) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[union_defn])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
( subset(X1,X2)
| ~ member(esk1_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( member(X1,union(X3,X2))
| ~ member(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1,X2] : subset(X1,union(X1,X2)),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_subset_of_union]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( subset(X1,union(X2,X3))
| ~ member(esk1_2(X1,union(X2,X3)),X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( member(esk1_2(X1,X2),X1)
| subset(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
fof(c_0_11,plain,
! [X13,X14] : union(X13,X14) = union(X14,X13),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[commutativity_of_union]) ).
fof(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
~ subset(esk3_0,union(esk3_0,esk4_0)),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
subset(X1,union(X2,X1)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
union(X1,X2) = union(X2,X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
~ subset(esk3_0,union(esk3_0,esk4_0)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
subset(X1,union(X1,X2)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13 % Problem : SET194+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.00/0.13 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Aug 26 12:23:25 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.55 start to proof: theBenchmark
% 0.18/0.56 % Version : CSE_E---1.5
% 0.18/0.56 % Problem : theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.57 % Proof found
% 0.18/0.57 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.57 % SZS output start Proof
% See solution above
% 0.18/0.57 % Total time : 0.005000 s
% 0.18/0.57 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.18/0.57 % Total time : 0.007000 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------