TSTP Solution File: SET194+3 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : SET194+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:56:10 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 3.32s 1.95s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.32s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :   11
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   18 (   4 unt;   8 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   18 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   13 (   5   ~;   5   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   12 (   6   >;   6   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   20 (;  20   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ subset > member > union > #nlpp > #skF_3 > #skF_5 > #skF_4 > #skF_2 > #skF_1

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(union,type,
    union: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_3',type,
    '#skF_3': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_5',type,
    '#skF_5': $i ).

tff(subset,type,
    subset: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(member,type,
    member: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_4',type,
    '#skF_4': $i ).

tff('#skF_2',type,
    '#skF_2': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_1',type,
    '#skF_1': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(f_41,axiom,
    ! [B,C] :
      ( subset(B,C)
    <=> ! [D] :
          ( member(D,B)
         => member(D,C) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',subset_defn) ).

tff(f_33,axiom,
    ! [B,C,D] :
      ( member(D,union(B,C))
    <=> ( member(D,B)
        | member(D,C) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',union_defn) ).

tff(f_59,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [B,C] : subset(B,union(B,C)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_subset_of_union) ).

tff(c_12,plain,
    ! [B_4,C_5] :
      ( member('#skF_1'(B_4,C_5),B_4)
      | subset(B_4,C_5) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_41]) ).

tff(c_73,plain,
    ! [D_24,B_25,C_26] :
      ( ~ member(D_24,B_25)
      | member(D_24,union(B_25,C_26)) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_33]) ).

tff(c_10,plain,
    ! [B_4,C_5] :
      ( ~ member('#skF_1'(B_4,C_5),C_5)
      | subset(B_4,C_5) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_41]) ).

tff(c_258,plain,
    ! [B_58,B_59,C_60] :
      ( subset(B_58,union(B_59,C_60))
      | ~ member('#skF_1'(B_58,union(B_59,C_60)),B_59) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_73,c_10]) ).

tff(c_284,plain,
    ! [B_4,C_60] : subset(B_4,union(B_4,C_60)),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_12,c_258]) ).

tff(c_30,plain,
    ~ subset('#skF_4',union('#skF_4','#skF_5')),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_59]) ).

tff(c_287,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_284,c_30]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem  : SET194+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.00/0.14  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.36  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 16:36:16 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 3.32/1.95  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.32/1.95  
% 3.32/1.95  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.32/1.97  
% 3.32/1.97  Inference rules
% 3.32/1.97  ----------------------
% 3.32/1.97  #Ref     : 0
% 3.32/1.97  #Sup     : 59
% 3.32/1.97  #Fact    : 0
% 3.32/1.97  #Define  : 0
% 3.32/1.97  #Split   : 0
% 3.32/1.97  #Chain   : 0
% 3.32/1.97  #Close   : 0
% 3.32/1.97  
% 3.32/1.97  Ordering : KBO
% 3.32/1.97  
% 3.32/1.97  Simplification rules
% 3.32/1.97  ----------------------
% 3.32/1.97  #Subsume      : 13
% 3.32/1.97  #Demod        : 2
% 3.32/1.97  #Tautology    : 18
% 3.32/1.97  #SimpNegUnit  : 0
% 3.32/1.97  #BackRed      : 1
% 3.32/1.97  
% 3.32/1.97  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 3.32/1.97  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 3.32/1.97  
% 3.32/1.97  Timing (in seconds)
% 3.32/1.97  ----------------------
% 3.32/1.98  Preprocessing        : 0.46
% 3.32/1.98  Parsing              : 0.25
% 3.32/1.98  CNF conversion       : 0.03
% 3.32/1.98  Main loop            : 0.31
% 3.32/1.98  Inferencing          : 0.11
% 3.32/1.98  Reduction            : 0.09
% 3.32/1.98  Demodulation         : 0.07
% 3.32/1.98  BG Simplification    : 0.02
% 3.32/1.98  Subsumption          : 0.08
% 3.32/1.98  Abstraction          : 0.01
% 3.32/1.98  MUC search           : 0.00
% 3.32/1.98  Cooper               : 0.00
% 3.32/1.98  Total                : 0.81
% 3.32/1.98  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 3.32/1.98  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 3.32/1.98  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 3.32/1.98  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------