TSTP Solution File: SET186-6 by iProver---3.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.8
% Problem : SET186-6 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 15:07:03 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 66.72s 9.76s
% Output : CNFRefutation 66.72s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 10
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 19 ( 6 unt; 6 nHn; 12 RR)
% Number of literals : 38 ( 2 equ; 15 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 29 ( 4 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_49,negated_conjecture,
union(x,y) = y,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_subclass_property4_1) ).
cnf(c_50,negated_conjecture,
~ subclass(x,y),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_subclass_property4_2) ).
cnf(c_72,plain,
( ~ subclass(X0,X1)
| ~ member(X2,X0)
| member(X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',subclass_members) ).
cnf(c_73,plain,
( member(not_subclass_element(X0,X1),X0)
| subclass(X0,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',not_subclass_members1) ).
cnf(c_74,plain,
( ~ member(not_subclass_element(X0,X1),X1)
| subclass(X0,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',not_subclass_members2) ).
cnf(c_75,plain,
subclass(X0,universal_class),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',class_elements_are_sets) ).
cnf(c_92,plain,
( ~ member(X0,intersection(X1,X2))
| member(X0,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',intersection1) ).
cnf(c_95,plain,
( ~ member(X0,complement(X1))
| ~ member(X0,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',complement1) ).
cnf(c_96,plain,
( ~ member(X0,universal_class)
| member(X0,complement(X1))
| member(X0,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',complement2) ).
cnf(c_97,plain,
complement(intersection(complement(X0),complement(X1))) = union(X0,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',union) ).
cnf(c_92979,plain,
( ~ member(X0,X1)
| member(X0,universal_class) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_75,c_72]) ).
cnf(c_93063,plain,
( ~ member(X0,universal_class)
| member(X0,intersection(complement(X1),complement(X2)))
| member(X0,union(X1,X2)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_97,c_96]) ).
cnf(c_94270,plain,
( ~ member(X0,universal_class)
| member(X0,union(X1,X2))
| member(X0,complement(X1)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_93063,c_92]) ).
cnf(c_97918,plain,
( ~ member(X0,universal_class)
| member(X0,complement(x))
| member(X0,y) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_49,c_94270]) ).
cnf(c_97983,plain,
( ~ member(X0,x)
| ~ member(X0,universal_class)
| member(X0,y) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_97918,c_95]) ).
cnf(c_97995,plain,
( ~ member(X0,x)
| member(X0,y) ),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_97983,c_92979]) ).
cnf(c_97996,plain,
( member(not_subclass_element(x,X0),y)
| subclass(x,X0) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_73,c_97995]) ).
cnf(c_98127,plain,
subclass(x,y),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_97996,c_74]) ).
cnf(c_98132,plain,
$false,
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_98127,c_50]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13 % Problem : SET186-6 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.00/0.14 % Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Sat Aug 26 11:54:08 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.48 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.21/0.48 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 66.72/9.76 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 66.72/9.76 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 66.72/9.76
% 66.72/9.76 %---------------- iProver v3.8 (pre SMT-COMP 2023/CASC 2023) ----------------%
% 66.72/9.76
% 66.72/9.76 ------ iProver source info
% 66.72/9.76
% 66.72/9.76 git: date: 2023-05-31 18:12:56 +0000
% 66.72/9.76 git: sha1: 8abddc1f627fd3ce0bcb8b4cbf113b3cc443d7b6
% 66.72/9.76 git: non_committed_changes: false
% 66.72/9.76 git: last_make_outside_of_git: false
% 66.72/9.76
% 66.72/9.76 ------ Parsing...successful
% 66.72/9.76
% 66.72/9.76
% 66.72/9.76
% 66.72/9.76 ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 2 sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e pe_s pe:1:0s pe:2:0s pe:4:0s pe_e sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 3 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e
% 66.72/9.76
% 66.72/9.76 ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e
% 66.72/9.76
% 66.72/9.76 ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 66.72/9.76 ------ Proving...
% 66.72/9.76 ------ Problem Properties
% 66.72/9.76
% 66.72/9.76
% 66.72/9.76 clauses 102
% 66.72/9.76 conjectures 2
% 66.72/9.76 EPR 13
% 66.72/9.76 Horn 94
% 66.72/9.76 unary 41
% 66.72/9.76 binary 40
% 66.72/9.76 lits 190
% 66.72/9.76 lits eq 45
% 66.72/9.76 fd_pure 0
% 66.72/9.76 fd_pseudo 0
% 66.72/9.76 fd_cond 3
% 66.72/9.76 fd_pseudo_cond 7
% 66.72/9.76 AC symbols 0
% 66.72/9.76
% 66.72/9.76 ------ Input Options Time Limit: Unbounded
% 66.72/9.76
% 66.72/9.76
% 66.72/9.76 ------
% 66.72/9.76 Current options:
% 66.72/9.76 ------
% 66.72/9.76
% 66.72/9.76
% 66.72/9.76
% 66.72/9.76
% 66.72/9.76 ------ Proving...
% 66.72/9.76
% 66.72/9.76
% 66.72/9.76 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 66.72/9.76
% 66.72/9.76 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 66.72/9.77
% 66.72/9.77
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------