TSTP Solution File: SET184-6 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : SET184-6 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 05:16:38 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 7.70s 7.89s
% Output   : Refutation 7.70s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : SET184-6 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Sun Jul 10 03:31:59 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.36  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.12/0.36  The process was started by sandbox on n013.cluster.edu,
% 0.12/0.36  Sun Jul 10 03:31:59 2022
% 0.12/0.36  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 4222.
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.12/0.36  set(auto).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.12/0.36  clear(print_given).
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  list(usable).
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=5.
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 0.12/0.36  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.12/0.36  unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.12/0.36  clauses in usable.
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  ------------> process usable:
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  ------------> process sos:
% 0.12/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 165 during input processing: 0 [copy,165,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.12/0.36  165 back subsumes 74.
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.90/1.08  
% 0.90/1.08  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.90/1.08  
% 0.90/1.08  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.90/1.08  
% 0.90/1.08  
% 0.90/1.08  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.90/1.08  
% 0.90/1.08  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.90/1.08  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.90/1.08  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.90/1.08  number of clauses in intial UL: 60
% 0.90/1.08  number of clauses initially in problem: 146
% 0.90/1.08  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 41
% 0.90/1.08  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 64
% 0.90/1.08  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.90/1.08  absolute distinct symbol count: 59
% 0.90/1.08     distinct predicate count: 11
% 0.90/1.08     distinct function count: 34
% 0.90/1.08     distinct constant count: 14
% 0.90/1.08  
% 0.90/1.08  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.90/1.08  
% 0.90/1.08  
% 0.90/1.08  
% 0.90/1.08  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.90/1.08  
% 0.90/1.08  =========== start of search ===========
% 7.70/7.89  
% 7.70/7.89  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 7.70/7.89  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 7.70/7.89  % SZS output start Refutation
% 7.70/7.89  
% 7.70/7.89  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 7.70/7.89  
% 7.70/7.89  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 7.70/7.89  
% 7.70/7.89  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 7.70/7.89  
% 7.70/7.89  Model 2 [ 5 5 47732 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 7.70/7.89  
% 7.70/7.89  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 7.70/7.89  
% 7.70/7.89  Model 3 [ 3 1 5080 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 7.70/7.89  
% 7.70/7.89  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 7.70/7.89  
% 7.70/7.89  Model 4 [ 14 3 19163 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 7.70/7.89  
% 7.70/7.89  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 7.70/7.89  
% 7.70/7.89  Model 5 [ 13 1 8962 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 7.70/7.89  
% 7.70/7.89  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 7.70/7.89  
% 7.70/7.89  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 7.70/7.89  
% 7.70/7.89  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 7.70/7.89  
% 7.70/7.89  Model 6 [ 14 2 18990 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 7.70/7.89  
% 7.70/7.89  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 7.70/7.89  
% 7.70/7.89  Model 7 [ 11 1 8693 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 7.70/7.89  
% 7.70/7.89  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 7.70/7.89  
% 7.70/7.89  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 7.70/7.89  
% 7.70/7.89  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 7.70/7.89  
% 7.70/7.89  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 7.70/7.89  
% 7.70/7.89  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 7.70/7.89  
% 7.70/7.89  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 7.70/7.89  
% 7.70/7.89  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 7.70/7.89  
% 7.70/7.89  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 7.70/7.89  
% 7.70/7.89  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 7.70/7.89  
% 7.70/7.89  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 7.70/7.89  
% 7.70/7.89  Model 8 [ 34 3 26895 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 7.70/7.89  
% 7.70/7.89  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 7.70/7.89  
% 7.70/7.89  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 7.70/7.89  
% 7.70/7.89  Model 9 [ 37 2 13891 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 7.70/7.89  
% 7.70/7.89  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 7.70/7.89  
% 7.70/7.89  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 7.70/7.89  
% 7.70/7.89  Model 10 [ 18 2 14011 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 7.70/7.89  
% 7.70/7.89  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 7.70/7.89  
% 7.70/7.89  Model 11 [ 56 0 2415 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 7.70/7.89  
% 7.70/7.89  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 7.70/7.89  
% 7.70/7.89  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 7.70/7.89  
% 7.70/7.89  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 7.70/7.89  
% 7.70/7.89  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 7.70/7.89  
% 7.70/7.89  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 7.70/7.89  
% 7.70/7.89  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 7.70/7.89  
% 7.70/7.89  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 7.70/7.89  
% 7.70/7.89  Model 12 [ 48 1 3456 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 7.70/7.89  
% 7.70/7.89  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 7.70/7.89  
% 7.70/7.89  Model 13 [ 64 1 911 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 7.70/7.89  
% 7.70/7.89  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 7.70/7.89  
% 7.70/7.89  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   7.49 sec ----> 2007 [binary,2006.1,73.1] {-} $F.
% 7.70/7.89  
% 7.70/7.89  Length of proof is 4.  Level of proof is 3.
% 7.70/7.89  
% 7.70/7.89  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 7.70/7.89  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 7.70/7.89  % SZS output start Refutation
% 7.70/7.89  
% 7.70/7.89  2 [] {+} -member(not_subclass_element(A,B),B)|subclass(A,B).
% 7.70/7.89  16 [] {+} -member(A,intersection(B,C))|member(A,C).
% 7.70/7.89  73 [] {+} -subclass(x,y).
% 7.70/7.89  82 [] {-} member(not_subclass_element(A,B),A)|subclass(A,B).
% 7.70/7.89  163 [] {+} intersection(x,y)=x.
% 7.70/7.89  186 [hyper,82,73] {-} member(not_subclass_element(x,y),x).
% 7.70/7.89  716 [para_from,163.1.1,16.1.2] {+} -member(A,x)|member(A,y).
% 7.70/7.89  1945 [hyper,716,186] {-} member(not_subclass_element(x,y),y).
% 7.70/7.89  2006 [hyper,1945,2] {-} subclass(x,y).
% 7.70/7.89  2007 [binary,2006.1,73.1] {-} $F.
% 7.70/7.89  
% 7.70/7.89  % SZS output end Refutation
% 7.70/7.89  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 7.70/7.89  
% 7.70/7.89  
% 7.70/7.89  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 7.70/7.89  
% 7.70/7.89  
% 7.70/7.89  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 7.70/7.89  
% 7.70/7.89  ============ end of search ============
% 7.70/7.89  
% 7.70/7.89  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 7.70/7.89  
% 7.70/7.89  true clauses given           5      (9.3%)
% 7.70/7.89  false clauses given         49
% 7.70/7.89  
% 7.70/7.89        FALSE     TRUE
% 7.70/7.89     6  2         2
% 7.70/7.89     7  65        7
% 7.70/7.89     8  36        19
% 7.70/7.89     9  200       21
% 7.70/7.89    10  43        97
% 7.70/7.89    11  296       75
% 7.70/7.89    12  92        26
% 7.70/7.89    13  65        172
% 7.70/7.89    14  16        89
% 7.70/7.89    15  11        69
% 7.70/7.89    16  8         43
% 7.70/7.89    17  6         45
% 7.70/7.89    18  9         19
% 7.70/7.89    19  9         13
% 7.70/7.89    20  5         23
% 7.70/7.89    21  7         7
% 7.70/7.89    22  5         14
% 7.70/7.89    23  2         14
% 7.70/7.89    24  1         10
% 7.70/7.89    25  0         2
% 7.70/7.89    26  0         7
% 7.70/7.89    27  1         23
% 7.70/7.89    28  0         6
% 7.70/7.89    29  0         12
% 7.70/7.89    30  0         9
% 7.70/7.89    31  0         12
% 7.70/7.89    32  0         14
% 7.70/7.89    33  0         3
% 7.70/7.89    34  0         10
% 7.70/7.89    36  0         1
% 7.70/7.89    37  0         1
% 7.70/7.89    39  0         1
% 7.70/7.89    42  0         1
% 7.70/7.89    46  0         2
% 7.70/7.89    48  0         4
% 7.70/7.89    50  0         2
% 7.70/7.89    55  0         1
% 7.70/7.89    57  0         2
% 7.70/7.89    59  0         1
% 7.70/7.89  tot:  879       879      (50.0% true)
% 7.70/7.89  
% 7.70/7.89  
% 7.70/7.89  Model 13 [ 64 -12 911 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 7.70/7.89  
% 7.70/7.89  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 7.70/7.89  
% 7.70/7.89  Process 4222 finished Sun Jul 10 03:32:07 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------