TSTP Solution File: SET183+3 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : SET183+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 05:16:37 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.89s 1.11s
% Output   : Refutation 0.89s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : SET183+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Sun Jul 10 22:00:58 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.36  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.12/0.36  The process was started by sandbox on n024.cluster.edu,
% 0.12/0.36  Sun Jul 10 22:00:58 2022
% 0.12/0.36  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 2734.
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.12/0.36  set(auto).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.12/0.36  clear(print_given).
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  formula_list(usable).
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=3.
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 0.12/0.36  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.12/0.36  unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.12/0.36  clauses in usable.
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  ------------> process usable:
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  ------------> process sos:
% 0.12/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 18 during input processing: 0 [copy,18,flip.1] {-} intersection(A,B)=intersection(B,A).
% 0.12/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 22 during input processing: 0 [copy,22,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.12/0.36  22 back subsumes 15.
% 0.12/0.36  22 back subsumes 14.
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.19/0.38  
% 0.19/0.38  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.38  
% 0.19/0.38  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.19/0.38  
% 0.19/0.38  
% 0.19/0.38  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.19/0.38  
% 0.19/0.38  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.19/0.38  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.19/0.38  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.19/0.38  number of clauses in intial UL: 13
% 0.19/0.38  number of clauses initially in problem: 20
% 0.19/0.38  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 65
% 0.19/0.38  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.19/0.38  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.19/0.38  absolute distinct symbol count: 8
% 0.19/0.38     distinct predicate count: 3
% 0.19/0.38     distinct function count: 3
% 0.19/0.38     distinct constant count: 2
% 0.19/0.38  
% 0.19/0.38  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.19/0.38  
% 0.19/0.38  
% 0.19/0.38  
% 0.19/0.38  =========== start of search ===========
% 0.89/1.11  
% 0.89/1.11  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 0.89/1.11  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.89/1.11  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.89/1.11  
% 0.89/1.11  Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.89/1.11  
% 0.89/1.11  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.89/1.11  
% 0.89/1.11  Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.89/1.11  
% 0.89/1.11  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.89/1.11  
% 0.89/1.11  Model 4 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.89/1.11  
% 0.89/1.11  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.89/1.11  
% 0.89/1.11  Model 5 [ 1 1 64 ] (0.00 seconds, 15725 Inserts)
% 0.89/1.11  
% 0.89/1.11  Model 6 [ 1 1 89 ] (0.00 seconds, 15485 Inserts)
% 0.89/1.11  
% 0.89/1.11  Model 7 [ 4 1 660 ] (0.00 seconds, 134430 Inserts)
% 0.89/1.11  
% 0.89/1.11  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   0.72 sec ----> 3065 [binary,3063.1,12.1] {-} $F.
% 0.89/1.11  
% 0.89/1.11  Length of proof is 9.  Level of proof is 7.
% 0.89/1.11  
% 0.89/1.11  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.89/1.11  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.89/1.11  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.89/1.11  
% 0.89/1.11  3 [] {+} member(A,intersection(B,C))| -member(A,B)| -member(A,C).
% 0.89/1.11  4 [] {+} -subset(A,B)| -member(C,A)|member(C,B).
% 0.89/1.11  5 [] {+} subset(A,B)| -member($f1(A,B),B).
% 0.89/1.11  8 [] {+} A=B| -subset(A,B)| -subset(B,A).
% 0.89/1.11  12 [] {+} intersection($c2,$c1)!=$c2.
% 0.89/1.11  16 [] {+} subset(intersection(A,B),A).
% 0.89/1.11  17 [] {+} subset(A,B)|member($f1(A,B),A).
% 0.89/1.11  18 [] {+} intersection(A,B)=intersection(B,A).
% 0.89/1.11  21 [] {+} subset($c2,$c1).
% 0.89/1.11  22 [] {+} A=A.
% 0.89/1.11  31 [para_into,18.1.1,8.1.1] {+} A=intersection(B,C)| -subset(intersection(C,B),A)| -subset(A,intersection(C,B)).
% 0.89/1.11  32 [para_from,18.1.1,16.1.1] {+} subset(intersection(A,B),B).
% 0.89/1.11  33 [para_from,18.1.1,12.1.1] {+} intersection($c1,$c2)!=$c2.
% 0.89/1.11  36 [hyper,17,8,32] {+} member($f1(A,intersection(B,A)),A)|intersection(B,A)=A.
% 0.89/1.11  2296 [para_from,36.2.1,33.1.1,unit_del,22] {+} member($f1($c2,intersection($c1,$c2)),$c2).
% 0.89/1.11  2320 [hyper,2296,4,21] {-} member($f1($c2,intersection($c1,$c2)),$c1).
% 0.89/1.11  2381 [hyper,2320,3,2296] {-} member($f1($c2,intersection($c1,$c2)),intersection($c1,$c2)).
% 0.89/1.11  2977 [hyper,2381,5] {+} subset($c2,intersection($c1,$c2)).
% 0.89/1.11  3063 [hyper,2977,31,32,flip.1] {-} intersection($c2,$c1)=$c2.
% 0.89/1.11  3065 [binary,3063.1,12.1] {-} $F.
% 0.89/1.11  
% 0.89/1.11  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.89/1.11  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.89/1.11  
% 0.89/1.11  
% 0.89/1.11  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.89/1.11  
% 0.89/1.11  
% 0.89/1.11  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.89/1.11  
% 0.89/1.11  ============ end of search ============
% 0.89/1.11  
% 0.89/1.11  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.89/1.11  
% 0.89/1.11  true clauses given          19      (29.7%)
% 0.89/1.11  false clauses given         45
% 0.89/1.11  
% 0.89/1.11        FALSE     TRUE
% 0.89/1.11     7  0         1
% 0.89/1.11     9  0         4
% 0.89/1.11    11  0         14
% 0.89/1.11    12  12        27
% 0.89/1.11    13  6         50
% 0.89/1.11    14  11        94
% 0.89/1.11    15  10        81
% 0.89/1.11    16  1         118
% 0.89/1.11    17  6         136
% 0.89/1.11    18  5         211
% 0.89/1.11    19  16        176
% 0.89/1.11    20  15        203
% 0.89/1.11    21  18        192
% 0.89/1.11    22  8         359
% 0.89/1.11    23  9         113
% 0.89/1.11    24  14        151
% 0.89/1.11    25  11        101
% 0.89/1.11    26  12        137
% 0.89/1.11    27  26        108
% 0.89/1.11    28  5         58
% 0.89/1.11    29  2         66
% 0.89/1.11    30  2         128
% 0.89/1.11    31  0         20
% 0.89/1.11    32  0         18
% 0.89/1.11    33  0         47
% 0.89/1.11    34  0         30
% 0.89/1.11    35  2         42
% 0.89/1.11    36  0         2
% 0.89/1.11    37  2         22
% 0.89/1.11    38  0         15
% 0.89/1.11    39  2         4
% 0.89/1.11    41  0         6
% 0.89/1.11    43  0         3
% 0.89/1.11    45  0         4
% 0.89/1.11    47  0         2
% 0.89/1.11    49  0         1
% 0.89/1.11    52  0         2
% 0.89/1.11  tot:  195       2746      (93.4% true)
% 0.89/1.11  
% 0.89/1.11  
% 0.89/1.11  Model 7 [ 4 1 660 ] (0.00 seconds, 134430 Inserts)
% 0.89/1.11  
% 0.89/1.11  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.89/1.11  
% 0.89/1.11  Process 2734 finished Sun Jul 10 22:00:59 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------