TSTP Solution File: SET171+4 by Princess---230619

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Princess---230619
% Problem  : SET171+4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s

% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 15:24:09 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 7.40s 1.73s
% Output   : Proof 9.46s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem  : SET171+4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.00/0.14  % Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s
% 0.14/0.36  % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % DateTime : Sat Aug 26 11:04:26 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.22/0.62  ________       _____
% 0.22/0.62  ___  __ \_________(_)________________________________
% 0.22/0.62  __  /_/ /_  ___/_  /__  __ \  ___/  _ \_  ___/_  ___/
% 0.22/0.62  _  ____/_  /   _  / _  / / / /__ /  __/(__  )_(__  )
% 0.22/0.62  /_/     /_/    /_/  /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/
% 0.22/0.62  
% 0.22/0.62  A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic
% 0.22/0.62  (2023-06-19)
% 0.22/0.62  
% 0.22/0.62  (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023
% 0.22/0.62  Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen,
% 0.22/0.62                Amanda Stjerna.
% 0.22/0.62  Free software under BSD-3-Clause.
% 0.22/0.62  
% 0.22/0.62  For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml
% 0.22/0.62  
% 0.22/0.62  Loading /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.22/0.63  Running up to 7 provers in parallel.
% 0.22/0.64  Prover 2: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994
% 0.22/0.64  Prover 4: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696
% 0.22/0.64  Prover 0: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893
% 0.22/0.64  Prover 1: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423
% 0.22/0.64  Prover 3: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996
% 0.22/0.64  Prover 5: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288
% 0.22/0.64  Prover 6: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365
% 2.36/1.02  Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 2.36/1.02  Prover 4: Preprocessing ...
% 2.80/1.06  Prover 6: Preprocessing ...
% 2.80/1.06  Prover 3: Preprocessing ...
% 2.80/1.06  Prover 5: Preprocessing ...
% 2.80/1.06  Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 2.80/1.06  Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 4.97/1.40  Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ...
% 4.97/1.41  Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 4.97/1.42  Prover 5: Proving ...
% 4.97/1.42  Prover 6: Proving ...
% 4.97/1.45  Prover 2: Proving ...
% 5.11/1.47  Prover 0: Proving ...
% 5.11/1.48  Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ...
% 7.40/1.72  Prover 3: proved (1082ms)
% 7.40/1.72  
% 7.40/1.73  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 7.40/1.73  
% 7.40/1.73  Prover 2: stopped
% 7.40/1.73  Prover 7: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-236303470
% 7.40/1.73  Prover 6: stopped
% 7.81/1.74  Prover 5: stopped
% 7.81/1.74  Prover 0: stopped
% 7.89/1.75  Prover 8: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-200781089
% 7.89/1.75  Prover 10: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=919308125
% 7.89/1.75  Prover 13: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1138197443
% 7.89/1.76  Prover 7: Preprocessing ...
% 7.89/1.76  Prover 11: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1509710984
% 7.89/1.77  Prover 8: Preprocessing ...
% 7.89/1.79  Prover 10: Preprocessing ...
% 7.89/1.79  Prover 13: Preprocessing ...
% 7.89/1.80  Prover 11: Preprocessing ...
% 8.32/1.84  Prover 7: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 8.32/1.84  Prover 10: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 8.32/1.85  Prover 7: Constructing countermodel ...
% 8.67/1.86  Prover 10: Constructing countermodel ...
% 8.67/1.87  Prover 13: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 8.67/1.88  Prover 8: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 8.67/1.89  Prover 13: Constructing countermodel ...
% 8.67/1.89  Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ...
% 8.67/1.91  Prover 1: Found proof (size 121)
% 8.67/1.91  Prover 1: proved (1269ms)
% 8.67/1.91  Prover 4: stopped
% 8.67/1.91  Prover 13: stopped
% 8.67/1.91  Prover 10: gave up
% 8.67/1.92  Prover 7: stopped
% 8.67/1.92  Prover 8: stopped
% 8.67/1.94  Prover 11: Constructing countermodel ...
% 9.26/1.94  Prover 11: stopped
% 9.26/1.94  
% 9.26/1.94  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 9.26/1.94  
% 9.26/1.96  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 9.26/1.96  Assumptions after simplification:
% 9.26/1.96  ---------------------------------
% 9.26/1.96  
% 9.26/1.96    (equal_set)
% 9.46/1.99     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: int] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (equal_set(v0, v1) =
% 9.46/1.99        v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v3: any] :  ? [v4: any] : (subset(v1,
% 9.46/1.99          v0) = v4 & subset(v0, v1) = v3 & ( ~ (v4 = 0) |  ~ (v3 = 0)))) &  ! [v0:
% 9.46/1.99      $i] :  ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ (equal_set(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |
% 9.46/1.99      (subset(v1, v0) = 0 & subset(v0, v1) = 0))
% 9.46/1.99  
% 9.46/1.99    (intersection)
% 9.46/1.99     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] :  ! [v4: int] : (v4 = 0
% 9.46/1.99      |  ~ (intersection(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (member(v0, v3) = v4) |  ~ $i(v2) |  ~
% 9.46/1.99      $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v5: any] :  ? [v6: any] : (member(v0, v2) = v6 &
% 9.46/1.99        member(v0, v1) = v5 & ( ~ (v6 = 0) |  ~ (v5 = 0)))) &  ! [v0: $i] :  !
% 9.46/1.99    [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : ( ~ (intersection(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~
% 9.46/1.99      (member(v0, v3) = 0) |  ~ $i(v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) | (member(v0, v2) =
% 9.46/1.99        0 & member(v0, v1) = 0))
% 9.46/1.99  
% 9.46/1.99    (subset)
% 9.46/1.99     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: int] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (subset(v0, v1) = v2)
% 9.46/1.99      |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v3: $i] :  ? [v4: int] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) &
% 9.46/1.99        member(v3, v1) = v4 & member(v3, v0) = 0 & $i(v3))) &  ! [v0: $i] :  !
% 9.46/2.00    [v1: $i] : ( ~ (subset(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ! [v2: $i] : (
% 9.46/2.00        ~ (member(v2, v0) = 0) |  ~ $i(v2) | member(v2, v1) = 0))
% 9.46/2.00  
% 9.46/2.00    (thI11)
% 9.46/2.00     ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: $i] :  ? [v2: $i] :  ? [v3: $i] :  ? [v4: $i] :  ? [v5:
% 9.46/2.00      $i] :  ? [v6: $i] :  ? [v7: $i] :  ? [v8: int] : ( ~ (v8 = 0) & union(v0,
% 9.46/2.00        v3) = v4 & union(v0, v2) = v6 & union(v0, v1) = v5 & intersection(v5, v6)
% 9.46/2.00      = v7 & intersection(v1, v2) = v3 & equal_set(v4, v7) = v8 & $i(v7) & $i(v6)
% 9.46/2.00      & $i(v5) & $i(v4) & $i(v3) & $i(v2) & $i(v1) & $i(v0))
% 9.46/2.00  
% 9.46/2.00    (union)
% 9.46/2.00     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] :  ! [v4: int] : (v4 = 0
% 9.46/2.00      |  ~ (union(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (member(v0, v3) = v4) |  ~ $i(v2) |  ~ $i(v1)
% 9.46/2.00      |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v5: int] :  ? [v6: int] : ( ~ (v6 = 0) &  ~ (v5 = 0) &
% 9.46/2.00        member(v0, v2) = v6 & member(v0, v1) = v5)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] : 
% 9.46/2.00    ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : ( ~ (union(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (member(v0, v3) = 0)
% 9.46/2.00      |  ~ $i(v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v4: any] :  ? [v5: any] :
% 9.46/2.00      (member(v0, v2) = v5 & member(v0, v1) = v4 & (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0)))
% 9.46/2.00  
% 9.46/2.00    (function-axioms)
% 9.46/2.01     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~
% 9.46/2.01      (unordered_pair(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (unordered_pair(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0:
% 9.46/2.01      $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~
% 9.46/2.01      (difference(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (difference(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  !
% 9.46/2.01    [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (union(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~
% 9.46/2.01      (union(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3:
% 9.46/2.01      $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (intersection(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (intersection(v3, v2) =
% 9.46/2.01        v0)) &  ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2:
% 9.46/2.01      $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (equal_set(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~
% 9.46/2.01      (equal_set(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1:
% 9.46/2.01      MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (subset(v3,
% 9.46/2.01          v2) = v1) |  ~ (subset(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  !
% 9.46/2.01    [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~
% 9.46/2.01      (member(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (member(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1:
% 9.46/2.01      $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (product(v2) = v1) |  ~ (product(v2) =
% 9.46/2.01        v0)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (sum(v2) =
% 9.46/2.01        v1) |  ~ (sum(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 =
% 9.46/2.01      v0 |  ~ (singleton(v2) = v1) |  ~ (singleton(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  !
% 9.46/2.01    [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (power_set(v2) = v1) |  ~
% 9.46/2.01      (power_set(v2) = v0))
% 9.46/2.01  
% 9.46/2.01  Further assumptions not needed in the proof:
% 9.46/2.01  --------------------------------------------
% 9.46/2.01  difference, empty_set, power_set, product, singleton, sum, unordered_pair
% 9.46/2.01  
% 9.46/2.01  Those formulas are unsatisfiable:
% 9.46/2.01  ---------------------------------
% 9.46/2.01  
% 9.46/2.01  Begin of proof
% 9.46/2.01  | 
% 9.46/2.01  | ALPHA: (subset) implies:
% 9.46/2.01  |   (1)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: int] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (subset(v0, v1)
% 9.46/2.01  |            = v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v3: $i] :  ? [v4: int] : ( ~
% 9.46/2.01  |            (v4 = 0) & member(v3, v1) = v4 & member(v3, v0) = 0 & $i(v3)))
% 9.46/2.01  | 
% 9.46/2.01  | ALPHA: (equal_set) implies:
% 9.46/2.01  |   (2)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: int] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (equal_set(v0,
% 9.46/2.01  |              v1) = v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v3: any] :  ? [v4: any] :
% 9.46/2.01  |          (subset(v1, v0) = v4 & subset(v0, v1) = v3 & ( ~ (v4 = 0) |  ~ (v3 =
% 9.46/2.01  |                0))))
% 9.46/2.01  | 
% 9.46/2.01  | ALPHA: (intersection) implies:
% 9.46/2.01  |   (3)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : ( ~
% 9.46/2.01  |          (intersection(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (member(v0, v3) = 0) |  ~ $i(v2) | 
% 9.46/2.01  |          ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) | (member(v0, v2) = 0 & member(v0, v1) = 0))
% 9.46/2.01  |   (4)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] :  ! [v4: int] :
% 9.46/2.01  |        (v4 = 0 |  ~ (intersection(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (member(v0, v3) = v4) | 
% 9.46/2.01  |          ~ $i(v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v5: any] :  ? [v6: any] :
% 9.46/2.01  |          (member(v0, v2) = v6 & member(v0, v1) = v5 & ( ~ (v6 = 0) |  ~ (v5 =
% 9.46/2.01  |                0))))
% 9.46/2.01  | 
% 9.46/2.01  | ALPHA: (union) implies:
% 9.46/2.01  |   (5)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : ( ~ (union(v1,
% 9.46/2.01  |              v2) = v3) |  ~ (member(v0, v3) = 0) |  ~ $i(v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~
% 9.46/2.01  |          $i(v0) |  ? [v4: any] :  ? [v5: any] : (member(v0, v2) = v5 &
% 9.46/2.01  |            member(v0, v1) = v4 & (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0)))
% 9.46/2.02  |   (6)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] :  ! [v4: int] :
% 9.46/2.02  |        (v4 = 0 |  ~ (union(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (member(v0, v3) = v4) |  ~
% 9.46/2.02  |          $i(v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v5: int] :  ? [v6: int] : ( ~
% 9.46/2.02  |            (v6 = 0) &  ~ (v5 = 0) & member(v0, v2) = v6 & member(v0, v1) =
% 9.46/2.02  |            v5))
% 9.46/2.02  | 
% 9.46/2.02  | ALPHA: (function-axioms) implies:
% 9.46/2.02  |   (7)   ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] :
% 9.46/2.02  |         ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (member(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (member(v3, v2)
% 9.46/2.02  |            = v0))
% 9.46/2.02  | 
% 9.46/2.02  | DELTA: instantiating (thI11) with fresh symbols all_15_0, all_15_1, all_15_2,
% 9.46/2.02  |        all_15_3, all_15_4, all_15_5, all_15_6, all_15_7, all_15_8 gives:
% 9.46/2.02  |   (8)   ~ (all_15_0 = 0) & union(all_15_8, all_15_5) = all_15_4 &
% 9.46/2.02  |        union(all_15_8, all_15_6) = all_15_2 & union(all_15_8, all_15_7) =
% 9.46/2.02  |        all_15_3 & intersection(all_15_3, all_15_2) = all_15_1 &
% 9.46/2.02  |        intersection(all_15_7, all_15_6) = all_15_5 & equal_set(all_15_4,
% 9.46/2.02  |          all_15_1) = all_15_0 & $i(all_15_1) & $i(all_15_2) & $i(all_15_3) &
% 9.46/2.02  |        $i(all_15_4) & $i(all_15_5) & $i(all_15_6) & $i(all_15_7) &
% 9.46/2.02  |        $i(all_15_8)
% 9.46/2.02  | 
% 9.46/2.02  | ALPHA: (8) implies:
% 9.46/2.02  |   (9)   ~ (all_15_0 = 0)
% 9.46/2.02  |   (10)  $i(all_15_8)
% 9.46/2.02  |   (11)  $i(all_15_7)
% 9.46/2.02  |   (12)  $i(all_15_6)
% 9.46/2.02  |   (13)  $i(all_15_5)
% 9.46/2.02  |   (14)  $i(all_15_4)
% 9.46/2.02  |   (15)  $i(all_15_3)
% 9.46/2.02  |   (16)  $i(all_15_2)
% 9.46/2.02  |   (17)  $i(all_15_1)
% 9.46/2.02  |   (18)  equal_set(all_15_4, all_15_1) = all_15_0
% 9.46/2.02  |   (19)  intersection(all_15_7, all_15_6) = all_15_5
% 9.46/2.02  |   (20)  intersection(all_15_3, all_15_2) = all_15_1
% 9.46/2.02  |   (21)  union(all_15_8, all_15_7) = all_15_3
% 9.46/2.02  |   (22)  union(all_15_8, all_15_6) = all_15_2
% 9.46/2.02  |   (23)  union(all_15_8, all_15_5) = all_15_4
% 9.46/2.02  | 
% 9.46/2.02  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (2) with all_15_4, all_15_1, all_15_0, simplifying
% 9.46/2.02  |              with (14), (17), (18) gives:
% 9.46/2.02  |   (24)  all_15_0 = 0 |  ? [v0: any] :  ? [v1: any] : (subset(all_15_1,
% 9.46/2.02  |             all_15_4) = v1 & subset(all_15_4, all_15_1) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | 
% 9.46/2.02  |             ~ (v0 = 0)))
% 9.46/2.02  | 
% 9.46/2.02  | BETA: splitting (24) gives:
% 9.46/2.02  | 
% 9.46/2.02  | Case 1:
% 9.46/2.02  | | 
% 9.46/2.02  | |   (25)  all_15_0 = 0
% 9.46/2.02  | | 
% 9.46/2.02  | | REDUCE: (9), (25) imply:
% 9.46/2.02  | |   (26)  $false
% 9.46/2.02  | | 
% 9.46/2.02  | | CLOSE: (26) is inconsistent.
% 9.46/2.02  | | 
% 9.46/2.02  | Case 2:
% 9.46/2.02  | | 
% 9.46/2.02  | |   (27)   ? [v0: any] :  ? [v1: any] : (subset(all_15_1, all_15_4) = v1 &
% 9.46/2.02  | |           subset(all_15_4, all_15_1) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0)))
% 9.46/2.02  | | 
% 9.46/2.02  | | DELTA: instantiating (27) with fresh symbols all_24_0, all_24_1 gives:
% 9.46/2.02  | |   (28)  subset(all_15_1, all_15_4) = all_24_0 & subset(all_15_4, all_15_1) =
% 9.46/2.02  | |         all_24_1 & ( ~ (all_24_0 = 0) |  ~ (all_24_1 = 0))
% 9.46/2.02  | | 
% 9.46/2.02  | | ALPHA: (28) implies:
% 9.46/2.03  | |   (29)  subset(all_15_4, all_15_1) = all_24_1
% 9.46/2.03  | |   (30)  subset(all_15_1, all_15_4) = all_24_0
% 9.46/2.03  | |   (31)   ~ (all_24_0 = 0) |  ~ (all_24_1 = 0)
% 9.46/2.03  | | 
% 9.46/2.03  | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (1) with all_15_4, all_15_1, all_24_1,
% 9.46/2.03  | |              simplifying with (14), (17), (29) gives:
% 9.46/2.03  | |   (32)  all_24_1 = 0 |  ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: int] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) &
% 9.46/2.03  | |           member(v0, all_15_1) = v1 & member(v0, all_15_4) = 0 & $i(v0))
% 9.46/2.03  | | 
% 9.46/2.03  | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (1) with all_15_1, all_15_4, all_24_0,
% 9.46/2.03  | |              simplifying with (14), (17), (30) gives:
% 9.46/2.03  | |   (33)  all_24_0 = 0 |  ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: int] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) &
% 9.46/2.03  | |           member(v0, all_15_1) = 0 & member(v0, all_15_4) = v1 & $i(v0))
% 9.46/2.03  | | 
% 9.46/2.03  | | BETA: splitting (31) gives:
% 9.46/2.03  | | 
% 9.46/2.03  | | Case 1:
% 9.46/2.03  | | | 
% 9.46/2.03  | | |   (34)   ~ (all_24_0 = 0)
% 9.46/2.03  | | | 
% 9.46/2.03  | | | BETA: splitting (33) gives:
% 9.46/2.03  | | | 
% 9.46/2.03  | | | Case 1:
% 9.46/2.03  | | | | 
% 9.46/2.03  | | | |   (35)  all_24_0 = 0
% 9.46/2.03  | | | | 
% 9.46/2.03  | | | | REDUCE: (34), (35) imply:
% 9.46/2.03  | | | |   (36)  $false
% 9.46/2.03  | | | | 
% 9.46/2.03  | | | | CLOSE: (36) is inconsistent.
% 9.46/2.03  | | | | 
% 9.46/2.03  | | | Case 2:
% 9.46/2.03  | | | | 
% 9.46/2.03  | | | |   (37)   ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: int] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & member(v0, all_15_1)
% 9.46/2.03  | | | |           = 0 & member(v0, all_15_4) = v1 & $i(v0))
% 9.46/2.03  | | | | 
% 9.46/2.03  | | | | DELTA: instantiating (37) with fresh symbols all_37_0, all_37_1 gives:
% 9.46/2.03  | | | |   (38)   ~ (all_37_0 = 0) & member(all_37_1, all_15_1) = 0 &
% 9.46/2.03  | | | |         member(all_37_1, all_15_4) = all_37_0 & $i(all_37_1)
% 9.46/2.03  | | | | 
% 9.46/2.03  | | | | ALPHA: (38) implies:
% 9.46/2.03  | | | |   (39)   ~ (all_37_0 = 0)
% 9.46/2.03  | | | |   (40)  $i(all_37_1)
% 9.46/2.03  | | | |   (41)  member(all_37_1, all_15_4) = all_37_0
% 9.46/2.03  | | | |   (42)  member(all_37_1, all_15_1) = 0
% 9.46/2.03  | | | | 
% 9.46/2.03  | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (6) with all_37_1, all_15_8, all_15_5,
% 9.46/2.03  | | | |              all_15_4, all_37_0, simplifying with (10), (13), (23),
% 9.46/2.03  | | | |              (40), (41) gives:
% 9.46/2.03  | | | |   (43)  all_37_0 = 0 |  ? [v0: int] :  ? [v1: int] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) &  ~
% 9.46/2.03  | | | |           (v0 = 0) & member(all_37_1, all_15_5) = v1 & member(all_37_1,
% 9.46/2.03  | | | |             all_15_8) = v0)
% 9.46/2.03  | | | | 
% 9.46/2.03  | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (3) with all_37_1, all_15_3, all_15_2,
% 9.46/2.03  | | | |              all_15_1, simplifying with (15), (16), (20), (40), (42)
% 9.46/2.03  | | | |              gives:
% 9.46/2.03  | | | |   (44)  member(all_37_1, all_15_2) = 0 & member(all_37_1, all_15_3) = 0
% 9.46/2.03  | | | | 
% 9.46/2.03  | | | | ALPHA: (44) implies:
% 9.46/2.03  | | | |   (45)  member(all_37_1, all_15_3) = 0
% 9.46/2.03  | | | |   (46)  member(all_37_1, all_15_2) = 0
% 9.46/2.03  | | | | 
% 9.46/2.03  | | | | BETA: splitting (43) gives:
% 9.46/2.03  | | | | 
% 9.46/2.03  | | | | Case 1:
% 9.46/2.03  | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.03  | | | | |   (47)  all_37_0 = 0
% 9.46/2.03  | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.03  | | | | | REDUCE: (39), (47) imply:
% 9.46/2.03  | | | | |   (48)  $false
% 9.46/2.03  | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.03  | | | | | CLOSE: (48) is inconsistent.
% 9.46/2.03  | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.03  | | | | Case 2:
% 9.46/2.03  | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.03  | | | | |   (49)   ? [v0: int] :  ? [v1: int] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) &  ~ (v0 = 0) &
% 9.46/2.03  | | | | |           member(all_37_1, all_15_5) = v1 & member(all_37_1, all_15_8)
% 9.46/2.03  | | | | |           = v0)
% 9.46/2.03  | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.03  | | | | | DELTA: instantiating (49) with fresh symbols all_49_0, all_49_1 gives:
% 9.46/2.03  | | | | |   (50)   ~ (all_49_0 = 0) &  ~ (all_49_1 = 0) & member(all_37_1,
% 9.46/2.03  | | | | |           all_15_5) = all_49_0 & member(all_37_1, all_15_8) = all_49_1
% 9.46/2.03  | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.03  | | | | | ALPHA: (50) implies:
% 9.46/2.03  | | | | |   (51)   ~ (all_49_1 = 0)
% 9.46/2.03  | | | | |   (52)   ~ (all_49_0 = 0)
% 9.46/2.04  | | | | |   (53)  member(all_37_1, all_15_8) = all_49_1
% 9.46/2.04  | | | | |   (54)  member(all_37_1, all_15_5) = all_49_0
% 9.46/2.04  | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.04  | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (4) with all_37_1, all_15_7, all_15_6,
% 9.46/2.04  | | | | |              all_15_5, all_49_0, simplifying with (11), (12), (19),
% 9.46/2.04  | | | | |              (40), (54) gives:
% 9.46/2.04  | | | | |   (55)  all_49_0 = 0 |  ? [v0: any] :  ? [v1: any] : (member(all_37_1,
% 9.46/2.04  | | | | |             all_15_6) = v1 & member(all_37_1, all_15_7) = v0 & ( ~ (v1
% 9.46/2.04  | | | | |               = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0)))
% 9.46/2.04  | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.04  | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (5) with all_37_1, all_15_8, all_15_7,
% 9.46/2.04  | | | | |              all_15_3, simplifying with (10), (11), (21), (40), (45)
% 9.46/2.04  | | | | |              gives:
% 9.46/2.04  | | | | |   (56)   ? [v0: any] :  ? [v1: any] : (member(all_37_1, all_15_7) = v1
% 9.46/2.04  | | | | |           & member(all_37_1, all_15_8) = v0 & (v1 = 0 | v0 = 0))
% 9.46/2.04  | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.04  | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (5) with all_37_1, all_15_8, all_15_6,
% 9.46/2.04  | | | | |              all_15_2, simplifying with (10), (12), (22), (40), (46)
% 9.46/2.04  | | | | |              gives:
% 9.46/2.04  | | | | |   (57)   ? [v0: any] :  ? [v1: any] : (member(all_37_1, all_15_6) = v1
% 9.46/2.04  | | | | |           & member(all_37_1, all_15_8) = v0 & (v1 = 0 | v0 = 0))
% 9.46/2.04  | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.04  | | | | | DELTA: instantiating (57) with fresh symbols all_56_0, all_56_1 gives:
% 9.46/2.04  | | | | |   (58)  member(all_37_1, all_15_6) = all_56_0 & member(all_37_1,
% 9.46/2.04  | | | | |           all_15_8) = all_56_1 & (all_56_0 = 0 | all_56_1 = 0)
% 9.46/2.04  | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.04  | | | | | ALPHA: (58) implies:
% 9.46/2.04  | | | | |   (59)  member(all_37_1, all_15_8) = all_56_1
% 9.46/2.04  | | | | |   (60)  member(all_37_1, all_15_6) = all_56_0
% 9.46/2.04  | | | | |   (61)  all_56_0 = 0 | all_56_1 = 0
% 9.46/2.04  | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.04  | | | | | DELTA: instantiating (56) with fresh symbols all_58_0, all_58_1 gives:
% 9.46/2.04  | | | | |   (62)  member(all_37_1, all_15_7) = all_58_0 & member(all_37_1,
% 9.46/2.04  | | | | |           all_15_8) = all_58_1 & (all_58_0 = 0 | all_58_1 = 0)
% 9.46/2.04  | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.04  | | | | | ALPHA: (62) implies:
% 9.46/2.04  | | | | |   (63)  member(all_37_1, all_15_8) = all_58_1
% 9.46/2.04  | | | | |   (64)  member(all_37_1, all_15_7) = all_58_0
% 9.46/2.04  | | | | |   (65)  all_58_0 = 0 | all_58_1 = 0
% 9.46/2.04  | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.04  | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (7) with all_49_1, all_58_1, all_15_8,
% 9.46/2.04  | | | | |              all_37_1, simplifying with (53), (63) gives:
% 9.46/2.04  | | | | |   (66)  all_58_1 = all_49_1
% 9.46/2.04  | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.04  | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (7) with all_56_1, all_58_1, all_15_8,
% 9.46/2.04  | | | | |              all_37_1, simplifying with (59), (63) gives:
% 9.46/2.04  | | | | |   (67)  all_58_1 = all_56_1
% 9.46/2.04  | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.04  | | | | | COMBINE_EQS: (66), (67) imply:
% 9.46/2.04  | | | | |   (68)  all_56_1 = all_49_1
% 9.46/2.04  | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.04  | | | | | BETA: splitting (61) gives:
% 9.46/2.04  | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.04  | | | | | Case 1:
% 9.46/2.04  | | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.04  | | | | | |   (69)  all_56_0 = 0
% 9.46/2.04  | | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.04  | | | | | | REDUCE: (60), (69) imply:
% 9.46/2.04  | | | | | |   (70)  member(all_37_1, all_15_6) = 0
% 9.46/2.04  | | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.04  | | | | | | BETA: splitting (55) gives:
% 9.46/2.04  | | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.04  | | | | | | Case 1:
% 9.46/2.04  | | | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.04  | | | | | | |   (71)  all_49_0 = 0
% 9.46/2.04  | | | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.04  | | | | | | | REDUCE: (52), (71) imply:
% 9.46/2.04  | | | | | | |   (72)  $false
% 9.46/2.04  | | | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.04  | | | | | | | CLOSE: (72) is inconsistent.
% 9.46/2.04  | | | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.04  | | | | | | Case 2:
% 9.46/2.04  | | | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.04  | | | | | | |   (73)   ? [v0: any] :  ? [v1: any] : (member(all_37_1, all_15_6)
% 9.46/2.04  | | | | | | |           = v1 & member(all_37_1, all_15_7) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | 
% 9.46/2.04  | | | | | | |             ~ (v0 = 0)))
% 9.46/2.04  | | | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.04  | | | | | | | DELTA: instantiating (73) with fresh symbols all_72_0, all_72_1
% 9.46/2.04  | | | | | | |        gives:
% 9.46/2.04  | | | | | | |   (74)  member(all_37_1, all_15_6) = all_72_0 & member(all_37_1,
% 9.46/2.04  | | | | | | |           all_15_7) = all_72_1 & ( ~ (all_72_0 = 0) |  ~ (all_72_1
% 9.46/2.04  | | | | | | |             = 0))
% 9.46/2.04  | | | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.05  | | | | | | | ALPHA: (74) implies:
% 9.46/2.05  | | | | | | |   (75)  member(all_37_1, all_15_7) = all_72_1
% 9.46/2.05  | | | | | | |   (76)  member(all_37_1, all_15_6) = all_72_0
% 9.46/2.05  | | | | | | |   (77)   ~ (all_72_0 = 0) |  ~ (all_72_1 = 0)
% 9.46/2.05  | | | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.05  | | | | | | | BETA: splitting (65) gives:
% 9.46/2.05  | | | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.05  | | | | | | | Case 1:
% 9.46/2.05  | | | | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.05  | | | | | | | |   (78)  all_58_0 = 0
% 9.46/2.05  | | | | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.05  | | | | | | | | REDUCE: (64), (78) imply:
% 9.46/2.05  | | | | | | | |   (79)  member(all_37_1, all_15_7) = 0
% 9.46/2.05  | | | | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.05  | | | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (7) with 0, all_72_1, all_15_7,
% 9.46/2.05  | | | | | | | |              all_37_1, simplifying with (75), (79) gives:
% 9.46/2.05  | | | | | | | |   (80)  all_72_1 = 0
% 9.46/2.05  | | | | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.05  | | | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (7) with 0, all_72_0, all_15_6,
% 9.46/2.05  | | | | | | | |              all_37_1, simplifying with (70), (76) gives:
% 9.46/2.05  | | | | | | | |   (81)  all_72_0 = 0
% 9.46/2.05  | | | | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.05  | | | | | | | | BETA: splitting (77) gives:
% 9.46/2.05  | | | | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.05  | | | | | | | | Case 1:
% 9.46/2.05  | | | | | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.05  | | | | | | | | |   (82)   ~ (all_72_0 = 0)
% 9.46/2.05  | | | | | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.05  | | | | | | | | | REDUCE: (81), (82) imply:
% 9.46/2.05  | | | | | | | | |   (83)  $false
% 9.46/2.05  | | | | | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.05  | | | | | | | | | CLOSE: (83) is inconsistent.
% 9.46/2.05  | | | | | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.05  | | | | | | | | Case 2:
% 9.46/2.05  | | | | | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.05  | | | | | | | | |   (84)   ~ (all_72_1 = 0)
% 9.46/2.05  | | | | | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.05  | | | | | | | | | REDUCE: (80), (84) imply:
% 9.46/2.05  | | | | | | | | |   (85)  $false
% 9.46/2.05  | | | | | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.05  | | | | | | | | | CLOSE: (85) is inconsistent.
% 9.46/2.05  | | | | | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.05  | | | | | | | | End of split
% 9.46/2.05  | | | | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.05  | | | | | | | Case 2:
% 9.46/2.05  | | | | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.05  | | | | | | | |   (86)  all_58_1 = 0
% 9.46/2.05  | | | | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.05  | | | | | | | | COMBINE_EQS: (66), (86) imply:
% 9.46/2.05  | | | | | | | |   (87)  all_49_1 = 0
% 9.46/2.05  | | | | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.05  | | | | | | | | REDUCE: (51), (87) imply:
% 9.46/2.05  | | | | | | | |   (88)  $false
% 9.46/2.05  | | | | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.05  | | | | | | | | CLOSE: (88) is inconsistent.
% 9.46/2.05  | | | | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.05  | | | | | | | End of split
% 9.46/2.05  | | | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.05  | | | | | | End of split
% 9.46/2.05  | | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.05  | | | | | Case 2:
% 9.46/2.05  | | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.05  | | | | | |   (89)  all_56_1 = 0
% 9.46/2.05  | | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.05  | | | | | | COMBINE_EQS: (68), (89) imply:
% 9.46/2.05  | | | | | |   (90)  all_49_1 = 0
% 9.46/2.05  | | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.05  | | | | | | SIMP: (90) implies:
% 9.46/2.05  | | | | | |   (91)  all_49_1 = 0
% 9.46/2.05  | | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.05  | | | | | | REDUCE: (51), (91) imply:
% 9.46/2.05  | | | | | |   (92)  $false
% 9.46/2.05  | | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.05  | | | | | | CLOSE: (92) is inconsistent.
% 9.46/2.05  | | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.05  | | | | | End of split
% 9.46/2.05  | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.05  | | | | End of split
% 9.46/2.05  | | | | 
% 9.46/2.05  | | | End of split
% 9.46/2.05  | | | 
% 9.46/2.05  | | Case 2:
% 9.46/2.05  | | | 
% 9.46/2.05  | | |   (93)   ~ (all_24_1 = 0)
% 9.46/2.05  | | | 
% 9.46/2.05  | | | BETA: splitting (32) gives:
% 9.46/2.05  | | | 
% 9.46/2.05  | | | Case 1:
% 9.46/2.05  | | | | 
% 9.46/2.05  | | | |   (94)  all_24_1 = 0
% 9.46/2.05  | | | | 
% 9.46/2.05  | | | | REDUCE: (93), (94) imply:
% 9.46/2.05  | | | |   (95)  $false
% 9.46/2.05  | | | | 
% 9.46/2.05  | | | | CLOSE: (95) is inconsistent.
% 9.46/2.05  | | | | 
% 9.46/2.05  | | | Case 2:
% 9.46/2.05  | | | | 
% 9.46/2.05  | | | |   (96)   ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: int] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & member(v0, all_15_1)
% 9.46/2.05  | | | |           = v1 & member(v0, all_15_4) = 0 & $i(v0))
% 9.46/2.05  | | | | 
% 9.46/2.05  | | | | DELTA: instantiating (96) with fresh symbols all_37_0, all_37_1 gives:
% 9.46/2.05  | | | |   (97)   ~ (all_37_0 = 0) & member(all_37_1, all_15_1) = all_37_0 &
% 9.46/2.05  | | | |         member(all_37_1, all_15_4) = 0 & $i(all_37_1)
% 9.46/2.05  | | | | 
% 9.46/2.05  | | | | ALPHA: (97) implies:
% 9.46/2.05  | | | |   (98)   ~ (all_37_0 = 0)
% 9.46/2.05  | | | |   (99)  $i(all_37_1)
% 9.46/2.05  | | | |   (100)  member(all_37_1, all_15_4) = 0
% 9.46/2.05  | | | |   (101)  member(all_37_1, all_15_1) = all_37_0
% 9.46/2.05  | | | | 
% 9.46/2.05  | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (5) with all_37_1, all_15_8, all_15_5,
% 9.46/2.05  | | | |              all_15_4, simplifying with (10), (13), (23), (99), (100)
% 9.46/2.05  | | | |              gives:
% 9.46/2.06  | | | |   (102)   ? [v0: any] :  ? [v1: any] : (member(all_37_1, all_15_5) = v1
% 9.46/2.06  | | | |            & member(all_37_1, all_15_8) = v0 & (v1 = 0 | v0 = 0))
% 9.46/2.06  | | | | 
% 9.46/2.06  | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (4) with all_37_1, all_15_3, all_15_2,
% 9.46/2.06  | | | |              all_15_1, all_37_0, simplifying with (15), (16), (20),
% 9.46/2.06  | | | |              (99), (101) gives:
% 9.46/2.06  | | | |   (103)  all_37_0 = 0 |  ? [v0: any] :  ? [v1: any] : (member(all_37_1,
% 9.46/2.06  | | | |              all_15_2) = v1 & member(all_37_1, all_15_3) = v0 & ( ~ (v1
% 9.46/2.06  | | | |                = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0)))
% 9.46/2.06  | | | | 
% 9.46/2.06  | | | | DELTA: instantiating (102) with fresh symbols all_45_0, all_45_1 gives:
% 9.46/2.06  | | | |   (104)  member(all_37_1, all_15_5) = all_45_0 & member(all_37_1,
% 9.46/2.06  | | | |            all_15_8) = all_45_1 & (all_45_0 = 0 | all_45_1 = 0)
% 9.46/2.06  | | | | 
% 9.46/2.06  | | | | ALPHA: (104) implies:
% 9.46/2.06  | | | |   (105)  member(all_37_1, all_15_8) = all_45_1
% 9.46/2.06  | | | |   (106)  member(all_37_1, all_15_5) = all_45_0
% 9.46/2.06  | | | |   (107)  all_45_0 = 0 | all_45_1 = 0
% 9.46/2.06  | | | | 
% 9.46/2.06  | | | | BETA: splitting (103) gives:
% 9.46/2.06  | | | | 
% 9.46/2.06  | | | | Case 1:
% 9.46/2.06  | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.06  | | | | |   (108)  all_37_0 = 0
% 9.46/2.06  | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.06  | | | | | REDUCE: (98), (108) imply:
% 9.46/2.06  | | | | |   (109)  $false
% 9.46/2.06  | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.06  | | | | | CLOSE: (109) is inconsistent.
% 9.46/2.06  | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.06  | | | | Case 2:
% 9.46/2.06  | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.06  | | | | |   (110)   ? [v0: any] :  ? [v1: any] : (member(all_37_1, all_15_2) =
% 9.46/2.06  | | | | |            v1 & member(all_37_1, all_15_3) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~
% 9.46/2.06  | | | | |              (v0 = 0)))
% 9.46/2.06  | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.06  | | | | | DELTA: instantiating (110) with fresh symbols all_51_0, all_51_1
% 9.46/2.06  | | | | |        gives:
% 9.46/2.06  | | | | |   (111)  member(all_37_1, all_15_2) = all_51_0 & member(all_37_1,
% 9.46/2.06  | | | | |            all_15_3) = all_51_1 & ( ~ (all_51_0 = 0) |  ~ (all_51_1 =
% 9.46/2.06  | | | | |              0))
% 9.46/2.06  | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.06  | | | | | ALPHA: (111) implies:
% 9.46/2.06  | | | | |   (112)  member(all_37_1, all_15_3) = all_51_1
% 9.46/2.06  | | | | |   (113)  member(all_37_1, all_15_2) = all_51_0
% 9.46/2.06  | | | | |   (114)   ~ (all_51_0 = 0) |  ~ (all_51_1 = 0)
% 9.46/2.06  | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.06  | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (6) with all_37_1, all_15_8, all_15_7,
% 9.46/2.06  | | | | |              all_15_3, all_51_1, simplifying with (10), (11), (21),
% 9.46/2.06  | | | | |              (99), (112) gives:
% 9.46/2.06  | | | | |   (115)  all_51_1 = 0 |  ? [v0: int] :  ? [v1: int] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & 
% 9.46/2.06  | | | | |            ~ (v0 = 0) & member(all_37_1, all_15_7) = v1 &
% 9.46/2.06  | | | | |            member(all_37_1, all_15_8) = v0)
% 9.46/2.06  | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.06  | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (6) with all_37_1, all_15_8, all_15_6,
% 9.46/2.06  | | | | |              all_15_2, all_51_0, simplifying with (10), (12), (22),
% 9.46/2.06  | | | | |              (99), (113) gives:
% 9.46/2.06  | | | | |   (116)  all_51_0 = 0 |  ? [v0: int] :  ? [v1: int] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & 
% 9.46/2.06  | | | | |            ~ (v0 = 0) & member(all_37_1, all_15_6) = v1 &
% 9.46/2.06  | | | | |            member(all_37_1, all_15_8) = v0)
% 9.46/2.06  | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.06  | | | | | BETA: splitting (107) gives:
% 9.46/2.06  | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.06  | | | | | Case 1:
% 9.46/2.06  | | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.06  | | | | | |   (117)  all_45_0 = 0
% 9.46/2.06  | | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.06  | | | | | | REDUCE: (106), (117) imply:
% 9.46/2.06  | | | | | |   (118)  member(all_37_1, all_15_5) = 0
% 9.46/2.06  | | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.06  | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (3) with all_37_1, all_15_7, all_15_6,
% 9.46/2.06  | | | | | |              all_15_5, simplifying with (11), (12), (19), (99),
% 9.46/2.06  | | | | | |              (118) gives:
% 9.46/2.06  | | | | | |   (119)  member(all_37_1, all_15_6) = 0 & member(all_37_1, all_15_7)
% 9.46/2.06  | | | | | |          = 0
% 9.46/2.06  | | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.06  | | | | | | ALPHA: (119) implies:
% 9.46/2.06  | | | | | |   (120)  member(all_37_1, all_15_7) = 0
% 9.46/2.06  | | | | | |   (121)  member(all_37_1, all_15_6) = 0
% 9.46/2.06  | | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.06  | | | | | | BETA: splitting (115) gives:
% 9.46/2.06  | | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.06  | | | | | | Case 1:
% 9.46/2.06  | | | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.06  | | | | | | |   (122)  all_51_1 = 0
% 9.46/2.06  | | | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.06  | | | | | | | BETA: splitting (114) gives:
% 9.46/2.06  | | | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.06  | | | | | | | Case 1:
% 9.46/2.06  | | | | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.06  | | | | | | | |   (123)   ~ (all_51_0 = 0)
% 9.46/2.06  | | | | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.06  | | | | | | | | BETA: splitting (116) gives:
% 9.46/2.06  | | | | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.06  | | | | | | | | Case 1:
% 9.46/2.06  | | | | | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.06  | | | | | | | | |   (124)  all_51_0 = 0
% 9.46/2.06  | | | | | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.06  | | | | | | | | | REDUCE: (123), (124) imply:
% 9.46/2.06  | | | | | | | | |   (125)  $false
% 9.46/2.06  | | | | | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.06  | | | | | | | | | CLOSE: (125) is inconsistent.
% 9.46/2.06  | | | | | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.06  | | | | | | | | Case 2:
% 9.46/2.06  | | | | | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.06  | | | | | | | | |   (126)   ? [v0: int] :  ? [v1: int] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) &  ~ (v0 =
% 9.46/2.06  | | | | | | | | |              0) & member(all_37_1, all_15_6) = v1 &
% 9.46/2.06  | | | | | | | | |            member(all_37_1, all_15_8) = v0)
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | | | | DELTA: instantiating (126) with fresh symbols all_78_0,
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | | | |        all_78_1 gives:
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | | | |   (127)   ~ (all_78_0 = 0) &  ~ (all_78_1 = 0) &
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | | | |          member(all_37_1, all_15_6) = all_78_0 &
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | | | |          member(all_37_1, all_15_8) = all_78_1
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | | | | ALPHA: (127) implies:
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | | | |   (128)   ~ (all_78_0 = 0)
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | | | |   (129)  member(all_37_1, all_15_6) = all_78_0
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (7) with 0, all_78_0, all_15_6,
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | | | |              all_37_1, simplifying with (121), (129) gives:
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | | | |   (130)  all_78_0 = 0
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | | | | REDUCE: (128), (130) imply:
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | | | |   (131)  $false
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | | | | CLOSE: (131) is inconsistent.
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | | | End of split
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | | Case 2:
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | | |   (132)   ~ (all_51_1 = 0)
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | | | REDUCE: (122), (132) imply:
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | | |   (133)  $false
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | | | CLOSE: (133) is inconsistent.
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | | End of split
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | Case 2:
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | |   (134)   ? [v0: int] :  ? [v1: int] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) &  ~ (v0 = 0)
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | |            & member(all_37_1, all_15_7) = v1 & member(all_37_1,
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | |              all_15_8) = v0)
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | | DELTA: instantiating (134) with fresh symbols all_70_0, all_70_1
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | |        gives:
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | |   (135)   ~ (all_70_0 = 0) &  ~ (all_70_1 = 0) & member(all_37_1,
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | |            all_15_7) = all_70_0 & member(all_37_1, all_15_8) =
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | |          all_70_1
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | | ALPHA: (135) implies:
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | |   (136)   ~ (all_70_0 = 0)
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | |   (137)  member(all_37_1, all_15_7) = all_70_0
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (7) with 0, all_70_0, all_15_7,
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | |              all_37_1, simplifying with (120), (137) gives:
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | |   (138)  all_70_0 = 0
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | | REDUCE: (136), (138) imply:
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | |   (139)  $false
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | | CLOSE: (139) is inconsistent.
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | End of split
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | Case 2:
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | |   (140)  all_45_1 = 0
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | REDUCE: (105), (140) imply:
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | |   (141)  member(all_37_1, all_15_8) = 0
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | BETA: splitting (115) gives:
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | Case 1:
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | |   (142)  all_51_1 = 0
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | | BETA: splitting (114) gives:
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | | Case 1:
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | | |   (143)   ~ (all_51_0 = 0)
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | | | BETA: splitting (116) gives:
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | | | Case 1:
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | | | |   (144)  all_51_0 = 0
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | | | | REDUCE: (143), (144) imply:
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | | | |   (145)  $false
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | | | | CLOSE: (145) is inconsistent.
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | | | Case 2:
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | | | |   (146)   ? [v0: int] :  ? [v1: int] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) &  ~ (v0 =
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | | | |              0) & member(all_37_1, all_15_6) = v1 &
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | | | |            member(all_37_1, all_15_8) = v0)
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | | | | DELTA: instantiating (146) with fresh symbols all_72_0,
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | | | |        all_72_1 gives:
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | | | |   (147)   ~ (all_72_0 = 0) &  ~ (all_72_1 = 0) &
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | | | |          member(all_37_1, all_15_6) = all_72_0 &
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | | | |          member(all_37_1, all_15_8) = all_72_1
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | | | | ALPHA: (147) implies:
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | | | |   (148)   ~ (all_72_1 = 0)
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | | | |   (149)  member(all_37_1, all_15_8) = all_72_1
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (7) with 0, all_72_1, all_15_8,
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | | | |              all_37_1, simplifying with (141), (149) gives:
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | | | |   (150)  all_72_1 = 0
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | | | | REDUCE: (148), (150) imply:
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | | | |   (151)  $false
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | | | | CLOSE: (151) is inconsistent.
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | | | End of split
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | | Case 2:
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | | |   (152)   ~ (all_51_1 = 0)
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | | | REDUCE: (142), (152) imply:
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | | |   (153)  $false
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | | | CLOSE: (153) is inconsistent.
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | | End of split
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | Case 2:
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | |   (154)   ? [v0: int] :  ? [v1: int] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) &  ~ (v0 = 0)
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | |            & member(all_37_1, all_15_7) = v1 & member(all_37_1,
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | |              all_15_8) = v0)
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | | DELTA: instantiating (154) with fresh symbols all_64_0, all_64_1
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | |        gives:
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | |   (155)   ~ (all_64_0 = 0) &  ~ (all_64_1 = 0) & member(all_37_1,
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | |            all_15_7) = all_64_0 & member(all_37_1, all_15_8) =
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | |          all_64_1
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | | ALPHA: (155) implies:
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | |   (156)   ~ (all_64_1 = 0)
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | |   (157)  member(all_37_1, all_15_8) = all_64_1
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (7) with 0, all_64_1, all_15_8,
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | |              all_37_1, simplifying with (141), (157) gives:
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | |   (158)  all_64_1 = 0
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | | REDUCE: (156), (158) imply:
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | |   (159)  $false
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | | CLOSE: (159) is inconsistent.
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | End of split
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | End of split
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | | 
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | End of split
% 9.46/2.07  | | | | 
% 9.46/2.07  | | | End of split
% 9.46/2.07  | | | 
% 9.46/2.07  | | End of split
% 9.46/2.07  | | 
% 9.46/2.07  | End of split
% 9.46/2.07  | 
% 9.46/2.07  End of proof
% 9.46/2.07  % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 9.46/2.07  
% 9.46/2.07  1453ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------