TSTP Solution File: SET166-6 by Prover9---1109a

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---1109a
% Problem  : SET166-6 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 04:27:54 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 9.67s 10.00s
% Output   : Refutation 9.67s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : SET166-6 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.13/0.13  % Command  : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 07:36:58 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.74/1.02  ============================== Prover9 ===============================
% 0.74/1.02  Prover9 (32) version 2009-11A, November 2009.
% 0.74/1.02  Process 20001 was started by sandbox2 on n018.cluster.edu,
% 0.74/1.02  Mon Jul 11 07:36:59 2022
% 0.74/1.02  The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -t 300 -f /tmp/Prover9_19758_n018.cluster.edu".
% 0.74/1.02  ============================== end of head ===========================
% 0.74/1.02  
% 0.74/1.02  ============================== INPUT =================================
% 0.74/1.02  
% 0.74/1.02  % Reading from file /tmp/Prover9_19758_n018.cluster.edu
% 0.74/1.02  
% 0.74/1.02  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.74/1.02  set(auto2).
% 0.74/1.02      % set(auto2) -> set(auto).
% 0.74/1.02      % set(auto) -> set(auto_inference).
% 0.74/1.02      % set(auto) -> set(auto_setup).
% 0.74/1.02      % set(auto_setup) -> set(predicate_elim).
% 0.74/1.02      % set(auto_setup) -> assign(eq_defs, unfold).
% 0.74/1.02      % set(auto) -> set(auto_limits).
% 0.74/1.02      % set(auto_limits) -> assign(max_weight, "100.000").
% 0.74/1.02      % set(auto_limits) -> assign(sos_limit, 20000).
% 0.74/1.02      % set(auto) -> set(auto_denials).
% 0.74/1.02      % set(auto) -> set(auto_process).
% 0.74/1.02      % set(auto2) -> assign(new_constants, 1).
% 0.74/1.02      % set(auto2) -> assign(fold_denial_max, 3).
% 0.74/1.02      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_weight, "200.000").
% 0.74/1.02      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_hours, 1).
% 0.74/1.02      % assign(max_hours, 1) -> assign(max_seconds, 3600).
% 0.74/1.02      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_seconds, 0).
% 0.74/1.02      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_minutes, 5).
% 0.74/1.02      % assign(max_minutes, 5) -> assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.74/1.02      % set(auto2) -> set(sort_initial_sos).
% 0.74/1.02      % set(auto2) -> assign(sos_limit, -1).
% 0.74/1.02      % set(auto2) -> assign(lrs_ticks, 3000).
% 0.74/1.02      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_megs, 400).
% 0.74/1.02      % set(auto2) -> assign(stats, some).
% 0.74/1.02      % set(auto2) -> clear(echo_input).
% 0.74/1.02      % set(auto2) -> set(quiet).
% 0.74/1.02      % set(auto2) -> clear(print_initial_clauses).
% 0.74/1.02      % set(auto2) -> clear(print_given).
% 0.74/1.02  assign(lrs_ticks,-1).
% 0.74/1.02  assign(sos_limit,10000).
% 0.74/1.02  assign(order,kbo).
% 0.74/1.02  set(lex_order_vars).
% 0.74/1.02  clear(print_given).
% 0.74/1.02  
% 0.74/1.02  % formulas(sos).  % not echoed (115 formulas)
% 0.74/1.02  
% 0.74/1.02  ============================== end of input ==========================
% 0.74/1.02  
% 0.74/1.02  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.74/1.02  
% 0.74/1.02  ============================== PROCESS NON-CLAUSAL FORMULAS ==========
% 0.74/1.02  
% 0.74/1.02  % Formulas that are not ordinary clauses:
% 0.74/1.02  
% 0.74/1.02  ============================== end of process non-clausal formulas ===
% 0.74/1.02  
% 0.74/1.02  ============================== PROCESS INITIAL CLAUSES ===============
% 0.74/1.02  
% 0.74/1.02  ============================== PREDICATE ELIMINATION =================
% 0.74/1.02  1 -member(null_class,A) | -subclass(image(successor_relation,A),A) | inductive(A) # label(inductive3) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.74/1.02  2 -inductive(A) | member(null_class,A) # label(inductive1) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.74/1.02  3 -inductive(A) | subclass(image(successor_relation,A),A) # label(inductive2) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.74/1.02  4 inductive(omega) # label(omega_is_inductive1) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.74/1.02  Derived: member(null_class,omega).  [resolve(4,a,2,a)].
% 0.74/1.02  Derived: subclass(image(successor_relation,omega),omega).  [resolve(4,a,3,a)].
% 0.74/1.02  5 -inductive(A) | subclass(omega,A) # label(omega_is_inductive2) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.74/1.02  Derived: subclass(omega,A) | -member(null_class,A) | -subclass(image(successor_relation,A),A).  [resolve(5,a,1,c)].
% 0.74/1.02  Derived: subclass(omega,omega).  [resolve(5,a,4,a)].
% 0.74/1.02  6 -subclass(compose(A,inverse(A)),identity_relation) | single_valued_class(A) # label(single_valued_class2) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.74/1.02  7 -single_valued_class(A) | subclass(compose(A,inverse(A)),identity_relation) # label(single_valued_class1) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.74/1.02  8 -function(inverse(A)) | -function(A) | one_to_one(A) # label(one_to_one3) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.74/1.02  9 -one_to_one(A) | function(A) # label(one_to_one1) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.74/1.02  10 -one_to_one(A) | function(inverse(A)) # label(one_to_one2) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.74/1.02  11 -subclass(A,cross_product(universal_class,universal_class)) | -subclass(compose(A,inverse(A)),identity_relation) | function(A) # label(function3) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.74/1.02  12 -function(A) | subclass(A,cross_product(universal_class,universal_class)) # label(function1) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.74/1.02  13 -function(A) | subclass(compose(A,inverse(A)),identity_relation) # label(function2) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.74/1.02  14 -function(A) | -member(B,universal_class) | member(image(A,B),universal_class) # label(replacement) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.74/1.02  Derived: -member(A,universal_class) | member(image(B,A),universal_class) | -subclass(B,cross_product(universal_class,universal_class)) | -subclass(compose(B,inverse(B)),identity_relation).  [resolve(14,a,11,c)].
% 0.74/1.02  15 function(choice) # label(choice1) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.74/1.02  Derived: subclass(choice,cross_product(universal_class,universal_class)).  [resolve(15,a,12,a)].
% 0.74/1.02  Derived: subclass(compose(choice,inverse(choice)),identity_relation).  [resolve(15,a,13,a)].
% 0.74/1.02  Derived: -member(A,universal_class) | member(image(choice,A),universal_class).  [resolve(15,a,14,a)].
% 0.74/1.02  16 -operation(A) | function(A) # label(operation1) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.74/1.02  Derived: -operation(A) | subclass(A,cross_product(universal_class,universal_class)).  [resolve(16,b,12,a)].
% 0.74/1.02  Derived: -operation(A) | subclass(compose(A,inverse(A)),identity_relation).  [resolve(16,b,13,a)].
% 0.74/1.02  Derived: -operation(A) | -member(B,universal_class) | member(image(A,B),universal_class).  [resolve(16,b,14,a)].
% 0.74/1.02  17 -function(A) | cross_product(domain_of(domain_of(A)),domain_of(domain_of(A))) != domain_of(A) | -subclass(range_of(A),domain_of(domain_of(A))) | operation(A) # label(operation4) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.74/1.02  Derived: cross_product(domain_of(domain_of(A)),domain_of(domain_of(A))) != domain_of(A) | -subclass(range_of(A),domain_of(domain_of(A))) | operation(A) | -subclass(A,cross_product(universal_class,universal_class)) | -subclass(compose(A,inverse(A)),identity_relation).  [resolve(17,a,11,c)].
% 0.74/1.02  Derived: cross_product(domain_of(domain_of(choice)),domain_of(domain_of(choice))) != domain_of(choice) | -subclass(range_of(choice),domain_of(domain_of(choice))) | operation(choice).  [resolve(17,a,15,a)].
% 0.74/1.02  18 -compatible(A,B,C) | function(A) # label(compatible1) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.74/1.02  Derived: -compatible(A,B,C) | subclass(A,cross_product(universal_class,universal_class)).  [resolve(18,b,12,a)].
% 0.74/1.02  Derived: -compatible(A,B,C) | subclass(compose(A,inverse(A)),identity_relation).  [resolve(18,b,13,a)].
% 0.74/1.02  Derived: -compatible(A,B,C) | -member(D,universal_class) | member(image(A,D),universal_class).  [resolve(18,b,14,a)].
% 0.74/1.02  Derived: -compatible(A,B,C) | cross_product(domain_of(domain_of(A)),domain_of(domain_of(A))) != domain_of(A) | -subclass(range_of(A),domain_of(domain_of(A))) | operation(A).  [resolve(18,b,17,a)].
% 0.74/1.02  19 -function(A) | domain_of(domain_of(B)) != domain_of(A) | -subclass(range_of(A),domain_of(domain_of(C))) | compatible(A,B,C) # label(compatible4) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.74/1.02  Derived: domain_of(domain_of(A)) != domain_of(B) | -subclass(range_of(B),domain_of(domain_of(C))) | compatible(B,A,C) | -subclass(B,cross_product(universal_class,universal_class)) | -subclass(compose(B,inverse(B)),identity_relation).  [resolve(19,a,11,c)].
% 0.74/1.02  Derived: domain_of(domain_of(A)) != domain_of(choice) | -subclass(range_of(choice),domain_of(domain_of(B))) | compatible(choice,A,B).  [resolve(19,a,15,a)].
% 0.74/1.02  Derived: domain_of(domain_of(A)) != domain_of(B) | -subclass(range_of(B),domain_of(domain_of(C))) | compatible(B,A,C) | -operation(B).  [resolve(19,a,16,b)].
% 0.74/1.02  Derived: domain_of(domain_of(A)) != domain_of(B) | -subclass(range_of(B),domain_of(domain_of(C))) | compatible(B,A,C) | -compatible(B,D,E).  [resolve(19,a,18,b)].
% 0.74/1.02  20 -maps(A,B,C) | function(A) # label(maps1) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.74/1.02  Derived: -maps(A,B,C) | subclass(A,cross_product(universal_class,universal_class)).  [resolve(20,b,12,a)].
% 0.74/1.02  Derived: -maps(A,B,C) | subclass(compose(A,inverse(A)),identity_relation).  [resolve(20,b,13,a)].
% 0.74/1.02  Derived: -maps(A,B,C) | -member(D,universal_class) | member(image(A,D),universal_class).  [resolve(20,b,14,a)].
% 0.74/1.02  Derived: -maps(A,B,C) | cross_product(domain_of(domain_of(A)),domain_of(domain_of(A))) != domain_of(A) | -subclass(range_of(A),domain_of(domain_of(A))) | operation(A).  [resolve(20,b,17,a)].
% 0.74/1.02  Derived: -maps(A,B,C) | domain_of(domain_of(D)) != domain_of(A) | -subclass(range_of(A),domain_of(domain_of(E))) | compatible(A,D,E).  [resolve(20,b,19,a)].
% 1.34/1.67  21 -function(A) | -subclass(range_of(A),B) | maps(A,domain_of(A),B) # label(maps4) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 1.34/1.67  Derived: -subclass(range_of(A),B) | maps(A,domain_of(A),B) | -subclass(A,cross_product(universal_class,universal_class)) | -subclass(compose(A,inverse(A)),identity_relation).  [resolve(21,a,11,c)].
% 1.34/1.67  Derived: -subclass(range_of(choice),A) | maps(choice,domain_of(choice),A).  [resolve(21,a,15,a)].
% 1.34/1.67  Derived: -subclass(range_of(A),B) | maps(A,domain_of(A),B) | -operation(A).  [resolve(21,a,16,b)].
% 1.34/1.67  Derived: -subclass(range_of(A),B) | maps(A,domain_of(A),B) | -compatible(A,C,D).  [resolve(21,a,18,b)].
% 1.34/1.67  Derived: -subclass(range_of(A),B) | maps(A,domain_of(A),B) | -maps(A,C,D).  [resolve(21,a,20,b)].
% 1.34/1.67  22 -operation(A) | -operation(B) | -compatible(C,A,B) | member(ordered_pair(not_homomorphism1(C,A,B),not_homomorphism2(C,A,B)),domain_of(A)) | homomorphism(C,A,B) # label(homomorphism5) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 1.34/1.67  23 -homomorphism(A,B,C) | operation(B) # label(homomorphism1) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 1.34/1.67  24 -homomorphism(A,B,C) | operation(C) # label(homomorphism2) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 1.34/1.67  25 -homomorphism(A,B,C) | compatible(A,B,C) # label(homomorphism3) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 1.34/1.67  26 -homomorphism(A,B,C) | -member(ordered_pair(D,E),domain_of(B)) | apply(C,ordered_pair(apply(A,D),apply(A,E))) = apply(A,apply(B,ordered_pair(D,E))) # label(homomorphism4) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 1.34/1.67  Derived: -operation(A) | -operation(B) | -compatible(C,A,B) | member(ordered_pair(not_homomorphism1(C,A,B),not_homomorphism2(C,A,B)),domain_of(A)) | -member(ordered_pair(D,E),domain_of(A)) | apply(B,ordered_pair(apply(C,D),apply(C,E))) = apply(C,apply(A,ordered_pair(D,E))).  [resolve(22,e,26,a)].
% 1.34/1.67  27 -operation(A) | -operation(B) | -compatible(C,A,B) | apply(B,ordered_pair(apply(C,not_homomorphism1(C,A,B)),apply(C,not_homomorphism2(C,A,B)))) != apply(C,apply(A,ordered_pair(not_homomorphism1(C,A,B),not_homomorphism2(C,A,B)))) | homomorphism(C,A,B) # label(homomorphism6) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 1.34/1.67  Derived: -operation(A) | -operation(B) | -compatible(C,A,B) | apply(B,ordered_pair(apply(C,not_homomorphism1(C,A,B)),apply(C,not_homomorphism2(C,A,B)))) != apply(C,apply(A,ordered_pair(not_homomorphism1(C,A,B),not_homomorphism2(C,A,B)))) | -member(ordered_pair(D,E),domain_of(A)) | apply(B,ordered_pair(apply(C,D),apply(C,E))) = apply(C,apply(A,ordered_pair(D,E))).  [resolve(27,e,26,a)].
% 1.34/1.67  
% 1.34/1.67  ============================== end predicate elimination =============
% 1.34/1.67  
% 1.34/1.67  Auto_denials:  (non-Horn, no changes).
% 1.34/1.67  
% 1.34/1.67  Term ordering decisions:
% 1.34/1.67  Function symbol KB weights:  universal_class=1. choice=1. identity_relation=1. element_relation=1. null_class=1. omega=1. successor_relation=1. application_function=1. composition_function=1. domain_relation=1. subset_relation=1. singleton_relation=1. x=1. y=1. z=1. ordered_pair=1. cross_product=1. compose=1. apply=1. intersection=1. image=1. unordered_pair=1. not_subclass_element=1. union=1. symmetric_difference=1. domain_of=1. range_of=1. inverse=1. complement=1. singleton=1. flip=1. compose_class=1. first=1. rotate=1. second=1. successor=1. sum_class=1. diagonalise=1. power_class=1. regular=1. single_valued1=1. single_valued2=1. cantor=1. single_valued3=1. restrict=1. not_homomorphism1=1. not_homomorphism2=1. domain=1. range=1.
% 1.34/1.67  
% 1.34/1.67  ============================== end of process initial clauses ========
% 1.34/1.67  
% 1.34/1.67  ============================== CLAUSES FOR SEARCH ====================
% 1.34/1.67  
% 1.34/1.67  ============================== end of clauses for search =============
% 1.34/1.67  
% 1.34/1.67  ============================== SEARCH ================================
% 1.34/1.67  
% 1.34/1.67  % Starting search at 0.04 seconds.
% 1.34/1.67  
% 1.34/1.67  Low Water (keep): wt=50.000, iters=3338
% 1.34/1.67  
% 1.34/1.67  Low Water (keep): wt=42.000, iters=3378
% 1.34/1.67  
% 1.34/1.67  Low Water (keep): wt=39.000, iters=3348
% 1.34/1.67  
% 1.34/1.67  Low Water (keep): wt=38.000, iters=3413
% 1.34/1.67  
% 1.34/1.67  Low Water (keep): wt=33.000, iters=3383
% 1.34/1.67  
% 1.34/1.67  NOTE: Back_subsumption disabled, ratio of kept to back_subsumed is 224 (0.00 of 0.65 sec).
% 1.34/1.67  
% 1.34/1.67  Low Water (keep): wt=31.000, iters=3367
% 1.34/1.67  
% 1.34/1.67  Low Water (keep): wt=29.000, iters=3359
% 1.34/1.67  
% 1.34/1.67  Low Water (keep): wt=28.000, iters=3343
% 1.34/1.67  
% 1.34/1.67  Low Water (keep): wt=27.000, iters=3375
% 9.67/10.00  
% 9.67/10.00  Low Water (keep): wt=26.000, iters=3377
% 9.67/10.00  
% 9.67/10.00  Low Water (keep): wt=25.000, iters=3358
% 9.67/10.00  
% 9.67/10.00  Low Water (keep): wt=24.000, iters=3334
% 9.67/10.00  
% 9.67/10.00  Low Water (keep): wt=23.000, iters=3372
% 9.67/10.00  
% 9.67/10.00  Low Water (keep): wt=22.000, iters=3400
% 9.67/10.00  
% 9.67/10.00  Low Water (keep): wt=21.000, iters=3346
% 9.67/10.00  
% 9.67/10.00  Low Water (keep): wt=20.000, iters=3336
% 9.67/10.00  
% 9.67/10.00  Low Water (keep): wt=19.000, iters=3355
% 9.67/10.00  
% 9.67/10.00  Low Water (keep): wt=18.000, iters=3335
% 9.67/10.00  
% 9.67/10.00  Low Water (keep): wt=17.000, iters=3358
% 9.67/10.00  
% 9.67/10.00  Low Water (displace): id=3568, wt=189.000
% 9.67/10.00  
% 9.67/10.00  Low Water (displace): id=2723, wt=175.000
% 9.67/10.00  
% 9.67/10.00  Low Water (displace): id=2692, wt=171.000
% 9.67/10.00  
% 9.67/10.00  Low Water (displace): id=2689, wt=155.000
% 9.67/10.00  
% 9.67/10.00  Low Water (displace): id=13317, wt=14.000
% 9.67/10.00  
% 9.67/10.00  Low Water (displace): id=13324, wt=13.000
% 9.67/10.00  
% 9.67/10.00  Low Water (displace): id=13963, wt=11.000
% 9.67/10.00  
% 9.67/10.00  Low Water (keep): wt=16.000, iters=3349
% 9.67/10.00  
% 9.67/10.00  Low Water (keep): wt=15.000, iters=3343
% 9.67/10.00  
% 9.67/10.00  Low Water (displace): id=24850, wt=10.000
% 9.67/10.00  
% 9.67/10.00  Low Water (keep): wt=13.000, iters=4518
% 9.67/10.00  
% 9.67/10.00  ============================== PROOF =================================
% 9.67/10.00  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 9.67/10.00  % SZS output start Refutation
% 9.67/10.00  
% 9.67/10.00  % Proof 1 at 8.59 (+ 0.41) seconds.
% 9.67/10.00  % Length of proof is 57.
% 9.67/10.00  % Level of proof is 13.
% 9.67/10.00  % Maximum clause weight is 17.000.
% 9.67/10.00  % Given clauses 5577.
% 9.67/10.00  
% 9.67/10.00  28 -subclass(A,B) | -member(C,A) | member(C,B) # label(subclass_members) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 9.67/10.00  31 subclass(A,universal_class) # label(class_elements_are_sets) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 9.67/10.00  35 -member(A,unordered_pair(B,C)) | A = B | A = C # label(unordered_pair_member) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 9.67/10.00  37 -member(A,universal_class) | member(A,unordered_pair(B,A)) # label(unordered_pair3) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 9.67/10.00  39 unordered_pair(A,A) = singleton(A) # label(singleton_set) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 9.67/10.00  40 singleton(A) = unordered_pair(A,A).  [copy(39),flip(a)].
% 9.67/10.00  56 -member(A,intersection(B,C)) | member(A,B) # label(intersection1) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 9.67/10.00  57 -member(A,intersection(B,C)) | member(A,C) # label(intersection2) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 9.67/10.00  58 -member(A,B) | -member(A,C) | member(A,intersection(B,C)) # label(intersection3) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 9.67/10.00  59 -member(A,complement(B)) | -member(A,B) # label(complement1) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 9.67/10.00  60 -member(A,universal_class) | member(A,complement(B)) | member(A,B) # label(complement2) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 9.67/10.00  61 complement(intersection(complement(A),complement(B))) = union(A,B) # label(union) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 9.67/10.00  62 union(A,B) = complement(intersection(complement(A),complement(B))).  [copy(61),flip(a)].
% 9.67/10.00  65 intersection(A,cross_product(B,C)) = restrict(A,B,C) # label(restriction1) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 9.67/10.00  66 restrict(A,B,C) = intersection(A,cross_product(B,C)).  [copy(65),flip(a)].
% 9.67/10.00  67 intersection(cross_product(A,B),C) = restrict(C,A,B) # label(restriction2) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 9.67/10.00  68 intersection(cross_product(A,B),C) = intersection(C,cross_product(A,B)).  [copy(67),rewrite([66(3)])].
% 9.67/10.00  69 restrict(A,singleton(B),universal_class) != null_class | -member(B,domain_of(A)) # label(domain1) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 9.67/10.00  70 intersection(A,cross_product(unordered_pair(B,B),universal_class)) != null_class | -member(B,domain_of(A)).  [copy(69),rewrite([40(1),66(3)])].
% 9.67/10.00  114 A = null_class | member(regular(A),A) # label(regularity1) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 9.67/10.00  115 null_class = A | member(regular(A),A).  [copy(114),flip(a)].
% 9.67/10.00  168 member(x,union(y,z)) # label(prove_members_of_union1_1) # label(negated_conjecture).  [assumption].
% 9.67/10.00  169 member(x,complement(intersection(complement(y),complement(z)))).  [copy(168),rewrite([62(4)])].
% 9.67/10.00  170 -member(x,y) # label(prove_members_of_union1_2) # label(negated_conjecture).  [assumption].
% 9.67/10.00  171 -member(x,z) # label(prove_members_of_union1_3) # label(negated_conjecture).  [assumption].
% 9.67/10.00  232 -member(A,unordered_pair(B,B)) | A = B.  [factor(35,b,c)].
% 9.67/10.00  234 -member(A,B) | member(A,intersection(B,B)).  [factor(58,a,b)].
% 9.67/10.00  240 -member(A,B) | member(A,universal_class).  [resolve(31,a,28,a)].
% 9.67/10.00  286 domain_of(A) = null_class | intersection(A,cross_product(unordered_pair(regular(domain_of(A)),regular(domain_of(A))),universal_class)) != null_class.  [resolve(115,b,70,b),flip(a)].
% 9.67/10.00  288 complement(A) = null_class | -member(regular(complement(A)),A).  [resolve(115,b,59,a),flip(a)].
% 9.67/10.00  291 intersection(A,B) = null_class | member(regular(intersection(A,B)),B).  [resolve(115,b,57,a),flip(a)].
% 9.67/10.00  292 intersection(A,B) = null_class | member(regular(intersection(A,B)),A).  [resolve(115,b,56,a),flip(a)].
% 9.67/10.00  327 -member(x,intersection(complement(y),complement(z))).  [resolve(169,a,59,a)].
% 9.67/10.00  401 member(x,universal_class).  [resolve(240,a,169,a)].
% 9.67/10.00  402 member(regular(A),universal_class) | null_class = A.  [resolve(240,a,115,b)].
% 9.67/10.00  429 member(x,complement(A)) | member(x,A).  [resolve(401,a,60,a)].
% 9.67/10.00  434 member(x,unordered_pair(A,x)).  [resolve(401,a,37,a)].
% 9.67/10.00  495 -member(x,A) | member(x,intersection(A,unordered_pair(B,x))).  [resolve(434,a,58,b)].
% 9.67/10.00  526 null_class = A | member(regular(A),intersection(universal_class,universal_class)).  [resolve(402,a,234,a)].
% 9.67/10.00  1655 complement(intersection(universal_class,universal_class)) = null_class.  [resolve(526,b,288,b),flip(a),merge(b)].
% 9.67/10.00  1666 -member(A,null_class) | -member(A,intersection(universal_class,universal_class)).  [para(1655(a,1),59(a,2))].
% 9.67/10.00  1754 -member(regular(A),null_class) | null_class = A.  [resolve(1666,b,526,b)].
% 9.67/10.00  2521 intersection(A,null_class) = null_class.  [resolve(291,b,1754,a),flip(b),merge(b)].
% 9.67/10.00  2548 intersection(A,unordered_pair(B,B)) = null_class | regular(intersection(A,unordered_pair(B,B))) = B.  [resolve(291,b,232,a)].
% 9.67/10.00  2572 intersection(null_class,cross_product(A,B)) = null_class.  [para(2521(a,1),68(a,1)),flip(a)].
% 9.67/10.00  2573 domain_of(null_class) = null_class.  [resolve(2572,a,286,b)].
% 9.67/10.00  2580 -member(A,null_class).  [para(2573(a,1),70(b,2)),rewrite([2572(5)]),xx(a)].
% 9.67/10.00  9044 member(x,intersection(complement(A),unordered_pair(B,x))) | member(x,A).  [resolve(495,a,429,a)].
% 9.67/10.00  36086 intersection(A,unordered_pair(B,B)) = null_class | member(B,A).  [para(2548(b,1),292(b,1)),merge(b)].
% 9.67/10.00  36116 intersection(complement(A),unordered_pair(B,B)) = null_class | -member(B,A).  [resolve(36086,b,59,a)].
% 9.67/10.00  36184 intersection(complement(complement(A)),unordered_pair(x,x)) = null_class | member(x,A).  [resolve(36116,b,429,a)].
% 9.67/10.00  37042 intersection(complement(complement(z)),unordered_pair(x,x)) = null_class.  [resolve(36184,b,171,a)].
% 9.67/10.00  37043 intersection(complement(complement(y)),unordered_pair(x,x)) = null_class.  [resolve(36184,b,170,a)].
% 9.67/10.00  37045 member(x,complement(z)).  [para(37042(a,1),9044(a,2)),unit_del(a,2580)].
% 9.67/10.00  37071 -member(x,A) | member(x,intersection(A,complement(z))).  [resolve(37045,a,58,b)].
% 9.67/10.00  37233 member(x,complement(y)).  [para(37043(a,1),9044(a,2)),unit_del(a,2580)].
% 9.67/10.00  37432 $F.  [resolve(37071,a,37233,a),unit_del(a,327)].
% 9.67/10.00  
% 9.67/10.00  % SZS output end Refutation
% 9.67/10.00  ============================== end of proof ==========================
% 9.67/10.00  
% 9.67/10.00  ============================== STATISTICS ============================
% 9.67/10.00  
% 9.67/10.00  Given=5577. Generated=814614. Kept=37321. proofs=1.
% 9.67/10.00  Usable=4910. Sos=9946. Demods=309. Limbo=11, Disabled=22602. Hints=0.
% 9.67/10.00  Megabytes=27.94.
% 9.67/10.00  User_CPU=8.59, System_CPU=0.41, Wall_clock=9.
% 9.67/10.00  
% 9.67/10.00  ============================== end of statistics =====================
% 9.67/10.00  
% 9.67/10.00  ============================== end of search =========================
% 9.67/10.00  
% 9.67/10.00  THEOREM PROVED
% 9.67/10.00  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 9.67/10.00  
% 9.67/10.00  Exiting with 1 proof.
% 9.67/10.00  
% 9.67/10.00  Process 20001 exit (max_proofs) Mon Jul 11 07:37:08 2022
% 9.67/10.00  Prover9 interrupted
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------