TSTP Solution File: SET166-6 by E-SAT---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem  : SET166-6 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:22:20 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.22s 0.54s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.22s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   25 (  15 unt;   2 nHn;  19 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   41 (   2 equ;  23 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   28 (   3 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(prove_members_of_union1_1,negated_conjecture,
    member(x,union(y,z)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Ew6QooPFaG/E---3.1_18465.p',prove_members_of_union1_1) ).

cnf(union,axiom,
    complement(intersection(complement(X1),complement(X2))) = union(X1,X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Ew6QooPFaG/E---3.1_18465.p',union) ).

cnf(complement1,axiom,
    ( ~ member(X1,complement(X2))
    | ~ member(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Ew6QooPFaG/E---3.1_18465.p',complement1) ).

cnf(subclass_members,axiom,
    ( member(X3,X2)
    | ~ subclass(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X3,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Ew6QooPFaG/E---3.1_18465.p',subclass_members) ).

cnf(class_elements_are_sets,axiom,
    subclass(X1,universal_class),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Ew6QooPFaG/E---3.1_18465.p',class_elements_are_sets) ).

cnf(intersection3,axiom,
    ( member(X1,intersection(X2,X3))
    | ~ member(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X1,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Ew6QooPFaG/E---3.1_18465.p',intersection3) ).

cnf(complement2,axiom,
    ( member(X1,complement(X2))
    | member(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X1,universal_class) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Ew6QooPFaG/E---3.1_18465.p',complement2) ).

cnf(prove_members_of_union1_3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ member(x,z),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Ew6QooPFaG/E---3.1_18465.p',prove_members_of_union1_3) ).

cnf(prove_members_of_union1_2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ member(x,y),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Ew6QooPFaG/E---3.1_18465.p',prove_members_of_union1_2) ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    member(x,union(y,z)),
    prove_members_of_union1_1 ).

cnf(c_0_10,axiom,
    complement(intersection(complement(X1),complement(X2))) = union(X1,X2),
    union ).

cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
    ( ~ member(X1,complement(X2))
    | ~ member(X1,X2) ),
    complement1 ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    member(x,complement(intersection(complement(y),complement(z)))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,axiom,
    ( member(X3,X2)
    | ~ subclass(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X3,X1) ),
    subclass_members ).

cnf(c_0_14,axiom,
    subclass(X1,universal_class),
    class_elements_are_sets ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ~ member(x,intersection(complement(y),complement(z))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,axiom,
    ( member(X1,intersection(X2,X3))
    | ~ member(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X1,X3) ),
    intersection3 ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( member(X1,universal_class)
    | ~ member(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ member(x,complement(z))
    | ~ member(x,complement(y)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,axiom,
    ( member(X1,complement(X2))
    | member(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X1,universal_class) ),
    complement2 ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    member(x,universal_class),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    ~ member(x,z),
    prove_members_of_union1_3 ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    ~ member(x,complement(y)),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),c_0_20])]),c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    ~ member(x,y),
    prove_members_of_union1_2 ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_19]),c_0_20])]),c_0_23]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem    : SET166-6 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.07/0.14  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.15/0.37  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.37  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.37  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.37  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.15/0.37  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.37  % DateTime   : Mon Oct  2 17:47:40 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.37  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.22/0.50  Running first-order model finding
% 0.22/0.50  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Ew6QooPFaG/E---3.1_18465.p
% 0.22/0.53  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.22/0.53  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.53  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.53  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.53  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.53  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.53  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.53  # C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 18542 completed with status 0
% 0.22/0.53  # Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 0.22/0.53  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.53  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.53  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.53  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.22/0.53  # Search class: FGHSM-FFLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.22/0.53  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.22/0.53  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 313s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.53  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.53  # Starting new_bool_1 with 308s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.53  # Starting sh5l with 304s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.53  # Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.54  # C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 18552 completed with status 0
% 0.22/0.54  # Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 0.22/0.54  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.54  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.54  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.54  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.22/0.54  # Search class: FGHSM-FFLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.22/0.54  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.22/0.54  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 313s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.54  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.54  # Preprocessing time       : 0.003 s
% 0.22/0.54  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.22/0.54  
% 0.22/0.54  # Proof found!
% 0.22/0.54  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.22/0.54  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.22/0.54  # Parsed axioms                        : 115
% 0.22/0.54  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.22/0.54  # Initial clauses                      : 115
% 0.22/0.54  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 17
% 0.22/0.54  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 98
% 0.22/0.54  # Processed clauses                    : 168
% 0.22/0.54  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.22/0.54  # ...subsumed                          : 2
% 0.22/0.54  # ...remaining for further processing  : 166
% 0.22/0.54  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 4
% 0.22/0.54  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.22/0.54  # Backward-subsumed                    : 1
% 0.22/0.54  # Backward-rewritten                   : 1
% 0.22/0.54  # Generated clauses                    : 83
% 0.22/0.54  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 68
% 0.22/0.54  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.22/0.54  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.22/0.54  # Paramodulations                      : 79
% 0.22/0.54  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.22/0.54  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.22/0.54  # Equation resolutions                 : 4
% 0.22/0.54  # Total rewrite steps                  : 11
% 0.22/0.54  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.22/0.54  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.22/0.54  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.22/0.54  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.22/0.54  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.22/0.54  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.22/0.54  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.22/0.54  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.22/0.54  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.22/0.54  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.22/0.54  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.22/0.54  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.22/0.54  # Current number of processed clauses  : 63
% 0.22/0.54  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 16
% 0.22/0.54  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.22/0.54  #    Negative unit clauses             : 4
% 0.22/0.54  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 43
% 0.22/0.54  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 95
% 0.22/0.54  # ...number of literals in the above   : 225
% 0.22/0.54  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.22/0.54  # Current number of archived clauses   : 116
% 0.22/0.54  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1486
% 0.22/0.54  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 721
% 0.22/0.54  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 2
% 0.22/0.54  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 12
% 0.22/0.54  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.22/0.54  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 3
% 0.22/0.54  # BW rewrite match successes           : 2
% 0.22/0.54  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.22/0.54  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.22/0.54  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 7671
% 0.22/0.54  
% 0.22/0.54  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.54  # User time                : 0.015 s
% 0.22/0.54  # System time              : 0.008 s
% 0.22/0.54  # Total time               : 0.022 s
% 0.22/0.54  # Maximum resident set size: 2004 pages
% 0.22/0.54  
% 0.22/0.54  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.54  # User time                : 0.060 s
% 0.22/0.54  # System time              : 0.022 s
% 0.22/0.54  # Total time               : 0.082 s
% 0.22/0.54  # Maximum resident set size: 1776 pages
% 0.22/0.54  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------