TSTP Solution File: SET160-6 by SPASS---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SPASS---3.9
% Problem : SET160-6 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : run_spass %d %s
% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 05:24:38 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 57.88s 58.07s
% Output : Refutation 57.88s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 10
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 20 ( 7 unt; 5 nHn; 20 RR)
% Number of literals : 37 ( 0 equ; 13 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 5 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
~ equal(union(y__dfg,x__dfg),union(x__dfg,y__dfg)),
file('SET160-6.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(3,axiom,
( subclass(u,v)
| member(not_subclass_element(u,v),u) ),
file('SET160-6.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(4,axiom,
( ~ member(not_subclass_element(u,v),v)
| subclass(u,v) ),
file('SET160-6.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(8,axiom,
( ~ subclass(u,v)
| ~ subclass(v,u)
| equal(v,u) ),
file('SET160-6.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(22,axiom,
( ~ member(u,intersection(v,w))
| member(u,v) ),
file('SET160-6.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(23,axiom,
( ~ member(u,intersection(v,w))
| member(u,w) ),
file('SET160-6.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(24,axiom,
( ~ member(u,v)
| ~ member(u,w)
| member(u,intersection(w,v)) ),
file('SET160-6.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(27,axiom,
equal(complement(intersection(complement(u),complement(v))),union(u,v)),
file('SET160-6.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(163,plain,
( subclass(intersection(u,v),w)
| member(not_subclass_element(intersection(u,v),w),v) ),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[3,23]),
[iquote('0:Res:3.1,23.0')] ).
cnf(169,plain,
( subclass(intersection(u,v),w)
| member(not_subclass_element(intersection(u,v),w),u) ),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[3,22]),
[iquote('0:Res:3.1,22.0')] ).
cnf(789,plain,
( ~ member(not_subclass_element(u,intersection(v,w)),w)
| ~ member(not_subclass_element(u,intersection(v,w)),v)
| subclass(u,intersection(v,w)) ),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[24,4]),
[iquote('0:Res:24.2,4.0')] ).
cnf(11001,plain,
( ~ member(not_subclass_element(intersection(u,v),intersection(w,u)),w)
| subclass(intersection(u,v),intersection(w,u))
| subclass(intersection(u,v),intersection(w,u)) ),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[169,789]),
[iquote('0:Res:169.1,789.0')] ).
cnf(11022,plain,
( ~ member(not_subclass_element(intersection(u,v),intersection(w,u)),w)
| subclass(intersection(u,v),intersection(w,u)) ),
inference(obv,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[11001]),
[iquote('0:Obv:11001.1')] ).
cnf(70037,plain,
( subclass(intersection(u,v),intersection(v,u))
| subclass(intersection(u,v),intersection(v,u)) ),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[163,11022]),
[iquote('0:Res:163.1,11022.0')] ).
cnf(70052,plain,
subclass(intersection(u,v),intersection(v,u)),
inference(obv,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[70037]),
[iquote('0:Obv:70037.0')] ).
cnf(70952,plain,
( ~ subclass(intersection(u,v),intersection(v,u))
| equal(intersection(u,v),intersection(v,u)) ),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[70052,8]),
[iquote('0:Res:70052.0,8.0')] ).
cnf(72420,plain,
equal(intersection(u,v),intersection(v,u)),
inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[70952,70052]),
[iquote('0:MRR:70952.0,70052.0')] ).
cnf(76212,plain,
equal(complement(intersection(complement(u),complement(v))),union(v,u)),
inference(spr,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[72420,27]),
[iquote('0:SpR:72420.0,27.0')] ).
cnf(76417,plain,
equal(union(u,v),union(v,u)),
inference(rew,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[27,76212]),
[iquote('0:Rew:27.0,76212.0')] ).
cnf(76418,plain,
$false,
inference(unc,[status(thm)],[76417,1]),
[iquote('0:UnC:76417.0,1.0')] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SET160-6 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : run_spass %d %s
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 09:34:35 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 57.88/58.07
% 57.88/58.07 SPASS V 3.9
% 57.88/58.07 SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 57.88/58.07 % SZS status Theorem
% 57.88/58.07 Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 57.88/58.07 SPASS derived 55731 clauses, backtracked 239 clauses, performed 8 splits and kept 19267 clauses.
% 57.88/58.07 SPASS allocated 138116 KBytes.
% 57.88/58.07 SPASS spent 0:0:56.75 on the problem.
% 57.88/58.07 0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 57.88/58.07 0:00:00.00 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 57.88/58.07 0:00:00.62 for inferences.
% 57.88/58.07 0:00:05.88 for the backtracking.
% 57.88/58.07 0:0:49.66 for the reduction.
% 57.88/58.07
% 57.88/58.07
% 57.88/58.07 Here is a proof with depth 5, length 20 :
% 57.88/58.07 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 57.88/58.07 Formulae used in the proof : prove_commutativity_of_union_1 not_subclass_members1 not_subclass_members2 subclass_implies_equal intersection1 intersection2 intersection3 union
% 57.88/58.07
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------