TSTP Solution File: SET159+4 by SuperZenon---0.0.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SuperZenon---0.0.1
% Problem  : SET159+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_super_zenon -p0 -itptp -om -max-time %d %s

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 05:39:58 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.13s 0.41s
% Output   : Proof 0.13s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : SET159+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command  : run_super_zenon -p0 -itptp -om -max-time %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 05:09:37 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.41  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.13/0.41  (* PROOF-FOUND *)
% 0.13/0.41  (* BEGIN-PROOF *)
% 0.13/0.41  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.13/0.41  1. (-. (member T_0 T_1)) (member T_0 T_1)   ### Axiom
% 0.13/0.41  2. (-. (member T_0 T_2)) (member T_0 T_2)   ### Axiom
% 0.13/0.41  3. (member T_0 (union T_1 T_2)) (-. (member T_0 T_2)) (-. (member T_0 T_1))   ### Extension/test/union 1 2
% 0.13/0.41  4. (-. (member T_0 T_3)) (member T_0 T_3)   ### Axiom
% 0.13/0.41  5. (member T_0 (union (union T_1 T_2) T_3)) (-. (member T_0 T_3)) (-. (member T_0 T_1)) (-. (member T_0 T_2))   ### Extension/test/union 3 4
% 0.13/0.41  6. (-. (member T_0 (union T_2 T_3))) (-. (member T_0 T_1)) (member T_0 (union (union T_1 T_2) T_3))   ### Extension/test/not_union 5
% 0.13/0.41  7. (-. (member T_0 (union T_1 (union T_2 T_3)))) (member T_0 (union (union T_1 T_2) T_3))   ### Extension/test/not_union 6
% 0.13/0.41  8. (-. (subset (union (union T_1 T_2) T_3) (union T_1 (union T_2 T_3))))   ### Extension/test/not_subset 7
% 0.13/0.41  9. (-. (member T_4 T_1)) (member T_4 T_1)   ### Axiom
% 0.13/0.41  10. (-. (member T_4 T_2)) (member T_4 T_2)   ### Axiom
% 0.13/0.41  11. (-. (member T_4 T_3)) (member T_4 T_3)   ### Axiom
% 0.13/0.41  12. (member T_4 (union T_2 T_3)) (-. (member T_4 T_3)) (-. (member T_4 T_2))   ### Extension/test/union 10 11
% 0.13/0.41  13. (member T_4 (union T_1 (union T_2 T_3))) (-. (member T_4 T_2)) (-. (member T_4 T_3)) (-. (member T_4 T_1))   ### Extension/test/union 9 12
% 0.13/0.41  14. (-. (member T_4 (union T_1 T_2))) (-. (member T_4 T_3)) (member T_4 (union T_1 (union T_2 T_3)))   ### Extension/test/not_union 13
% 0.13/0.41  15. (-. (member T_4 (union (union T_1 T_2) T_3))) (member T_4 (union T_1 (union T_2 T_3)))   ### Extension/test/not_union 14
% 0.13/0.41  16. (-. (subset (union T_1 (union T_2 T_3)) (union (union T_1 T_2) T_3)))   ### Extension/test/not_subset 15
% 0.13/0.41  17. (-. (equal_set (union (union T_1 T_2) T_3) (union T_1 (union T_2 T_3))))   ### Extension/test/not_equal_set 8 16
% 0.13/0.41  18. (-. (All C, (equal_set (union (union T_1 T_2) C) (union T_1 (union T_2 C)))))   ### NotAllEx 17
% 0.13/0.41  19. (-. (All B, (All C, (equal_set (union (union T_1 B) C) (union T_1 (union B C))))))   ### NotAllEx 18
% 0.13/0.41  20. (-. (All A, (All B, (All C, (equal_set (union (union A B) C) (union A (union B C)))))))   ### NotAllEx 19
% 0.13/0.41  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.13/0.41  (* END-PROOF *)
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------