TSTP Solution File: SET159+3 by SuperZenon---0.0.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SuperZenon---0.0.1
% Problem : SET159+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_super_zenon -p0 -itptp -om -max-time %d %s
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 05:39:58 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.19s 0.40s
% Output : Proof 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SET159+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : run_super_zenon -p0 -itptp -om -max-time %d %s
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 02:13:38 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.40 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/0.40 (* PROOF-FOUND *)
% 0.19/0.40 (* BEGIN-PROOF *)
% 0.19/0.40 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.19/0.40 1. (-. (member T_0 T_1)) (member T_0 T_1) ### Axiom
% 0.19/0.40 2. (-. (member T_0 T_2)) (member T_0 T_2) ### Axiom
% 0.19/0.40 3. (-. (member T_0 T_3)) (member T_0 T_3) ### Axiom
% 0.19/0.40 4. (member T_0 (union T_2 T_3)) (-. (member T_0 T_3)) (-. (member T_0 T_2)) ### Extension/test/union_defn 2 3
% 0.19/0.40 5. (member T_0 (union T_1 (union T_2 T_3))) (-. (member T_0 T_2)) (-. (member T_0 T_3)) (-. (member T_0 T_1)) ### Extension/test/union_defn 1 4
% 0.19/0.40 6. (-. (member T_0 (union T_1 T_2))) (-. (member T_0 T_3)) (member T_0 (union T_1 (union T_2 T_3))) ### Extension/test/not_union_defn 5
% 0.19/0.40 7. (-. (member T_0 (union (union T_1 T_2) T_3))) (member T_0 (union T_1 (union T_2 T_3))) ### Extension/test/not_union_defn 6
% 0.19/0.40 8. (-. (member T_0 T_1)) (member T_0 T_1) ### Axiom
% 0.19/0.40 9. (-. (member T_0 T_2)) (member T_0 T_2) ### Axiom
% 0.19/0.40 10. (member T_0 (union T_1 T_2)) (-. (member T_0 T_2)) (-. (member T_0 T_1)) ### Extension/test/union_defn 8 9
% 0.19/0.40 11. (-. (member T_0 T_3)) (member T_0 T_3) ### Axiom
% 0.19/0.40 12. (member T_0 (union (union T_1 T_2) T_3)) (-. (member T_0 T_3)) (-. (member T_0 T_1)) (-. (member T_0 T_2)) ### Extension/test/union_defn 10 11
% 0.19/0.40 13. (-. (member T_0 (union T_2 T_3))) (-. (member T_0 T_1)) (member T_0 (union (union T_1 T_2) T_3)) ### Extension/test/not_union_defn 12
% 0.19/0.40 14. (-. (member T_0 (union T_1 (union T_2 T_3)))) (member T_0 (union (union T_1 T_2) T_3)) ### Extension/test/not_union_defn 13
% 0.19/0.40 15. ((union (union T_1 T_2) T_3) != (union T_1 (union T_2 T_3))) ### Extension/test/not_equal_member_defn 7 14
% 0.19/0.40 16. (-. (All D, ((union (union T_1 T_2) D) = (union T_1 (union T_2 D))))) ### NotAllEx 15
% 0.19/0.40 17. (-. (All C, (All D, ((union (union T_1 C) D) = (union T_1 (union C D)))))) ### NotAllEx 16
% 0.19/0.40 18. (-. (All B, (All C, (All D, ((union (union B C) D) = (union B (union C D))))))) ### NotAllEx 17
% 0.19/0.40 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.19/0.40 (* END-PROOF *)
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------