TSTP Solution File: SET148+4 by SRASS---0.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SRASS---0.1
% Problem : SET148+4 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : SRASS -q2 -a 0 10 10 10 -i3 -n60 %s
% Computer : art11.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.00GHz @ 3000MHz
% Memory : 2006MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.31.5-127.fc12.i686.PAE
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Dec 29 23:07:49 EST 2010
% Result : Theorem 2.75s
% Output : Solution 2.75s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ERROR: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Reading problem from /tmp/SystemOnTPTP4316/SET148+4.tptp
% Adding relevance values
% Extracting the conjecture
% Sorting axioms by relevance
% Looking for THM ...
% found
% SZS status THM for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP4316/SET148+4.tptp
% SZS output start Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP4316/SET148+4.tptp
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% TreeLimitedRun: /home/graph/tptp/Systems/EP---1.2/eproof --print-statistics -xAuto -tAuto --cpu-limit=60 --proof-time-unlimited --memory-limit=Auto --tstp-in --tstp-out /tmp/SRASS.s.p
% TreeLimitedRun: CPU time limit is 60s
% TreeLimitedRun: WC time limit is 120s
% TreeLimitedRun: PID is 4448
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% PrfWatch: 0.00 CPU 0.02 WC
% # Preprocessing time : 0.013 s
% # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% # SZS status Theorem
% # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% fof(1, axiom,![X1]:![X2]:![X3]:(member(X1,intersection(X2,X3))<=>(member(X1,X2)&member(X1,X3))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', intersection)).
% fof(2, axiom,![X2]:![X3]:(equal_set(X2,X3)<=>(subset(X2,X3)&subset(X3,X2))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', equal_set)).
% fof(3, axiom,![X2]:![X3]:(subset(X2,X3)<=>![X1]:(member(X1,X2)=>member(X1,X3))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', subset)).
% fof(12, conjecture,![X2]:equal_set(intersection(X2,X2),X2),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', thI13)).
% fof(13, negated_conjecture,~(![X2]:equal_set(intersection(X2,X2),X2)),inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[12])).
% fof(16, plain,![X1]:![X2]:![X3]:((~(member(X1,intersection(X2,X3)))|(member(X1,X2)&member(X1,X3)))&((~(member(X1,X2))|~(member(X1,X3)))|member(X1,intersection(X2,X3)))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[1])).
% fof(17, plain,![X4]:![X5]:![X6]:((~(member(X4,intersection(X5,X6)))|(member(X4,X5)&member(X4,X6)))&((~(member(X4,X5))|~(member(X4,X6)))|member(X4,intersection(X5,X6)))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[16])).
% fof(18, plain,![X4]:![X5]:![X6]:(((member(X4,X5)|~(member(X4,intersection(X5,X6))))&(member(X4,X6)|~(member(X4,intersection(X5,X6)))))&((~(member(X4,X5))|~(member(X4,X6)))|member(X4,intersection(X5,X6)))),inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[17])).
% cnf(19,plain,(member(X1,intersection(X2,X3))|~member(X1,X3)|~member(X1,X2)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[18])).
% cnf(21,plain,(member(X1,X2)|~member(X1,intersection(X2,X3))),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[18])).
% fof(22, plain,![X2]:![X3]:((~(equal_set(X2,X3))|(subset(X2,X3)&subset(X3,X2)))&((~(subset(X2,X3))|~(subset(X3,X2)))|equal_set(X2,X3))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[2])).
% fof(23, plain,![X4]:![X5]:((~(equal_set(X4,X5))|(subset(X4,X5)&subset(X5,X4)))&((~(subset(X4,X5))|~(subset(X5,X4)))|equal_set(X4,X5))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[22])).
% fof(24, plain,![X4]:![X5]:(((subset(X4,X5)|~(equal_set(X4,X5)))&(subset(X5,X4)|~(equal_set(X4,X5))))&((~(subset(X4,X5))|~(subset(X5,X4)))|equal_set(X4,X5))),inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[23])).
% cnf(25,plain,(equal_set(X1,X2)|~subset(X2,X1)|~subset(X1,X2)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[24])).
% fof(28, plain,![X2]:![X3]:((~(subset(X2,X3))|![X1]:(~(member(X1,X2))|member(X1,X3)))&(?[X1]:(member(X1,X2)&~(member(X1,X3)))|subset(X2,X3))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[3])).
% fof(29, plain,![X4]:![X5]:((~(subset(X4,X5))|![X6]:(~(member(X6,X4))|member(X6,X5)))&(?[X7]:(member(X7,X4)&~(member(X7,X5)))|subset(X4,X5))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[28])).
% fof(30, plain,![X4]:![X5]:((~(subset(X4,X5))|![X6]:(~(member(X6,X4))|member(X6,X5)))&((member(esk1_2(X4,X5),X4)&~(member(esk1_2(X4,X5),X5)))|subset(X4,X5))),inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[29])).
% fof(31, plain,![X4]:![X5]:![X6]:(((~(member(X6,X4))|member(X6,X5))|~(subset(X4,X5)))&((member(esk1_2(X4,X5),X4)&~(member(esk1_2(X4,X5),X5)))|subset(X4,X5))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[30])).
% fof(32, plain,![X4]:![X5]:![X6]:(((~(member(X6,X4))|member(X6,X5))|~(subset(X4,X5)))&((member(esk1_2(X4,X5),X4)|subset(X4,X5))&(~(member(esk1_2(X4,X5),X5))|subset(X4,X5)))),inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[31])).
% cnf(33,plain,(subset(X1,X2)|~member(esk1_2(X1,X2),X2)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[32])).
% cnf(34,plain,(subset(X1,X2)|member(esk1_2(X1,X2),X1)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[32])).
% fof(80, negated_conjecture,?[X2]:~(equal_set(intersection(X2,X2),X2)),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[13])).
% fof(81, negated_conjecture,?[X3]:~(equal_set(intersection(X3,X3),X3)),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[80])).
% fof(82, negated_conjecture,~(equal_set(intersection(esk4_0,esk4_0),esk4_0)),inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[81])).
% cnf(83,negated_conjecture,(~equal_set(intersection(esk4_0,esk4_0),esk4_0)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[82])).
% cnf(87,negated_conjecture,(~subset(esk4_0,intersection(esk4_0,esk4_0))|~subset(intersection(esk4_0,esk4_0),esk4_0)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[83,25,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(93,plain,(member(esk1_2(intersection(X1,X2),X3),X1)|subset(intersection(X1,X2),X3)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[21,34,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(101,plain,(subset(X1,intersection(X2,X3))|~member(esk1_2(X1,intersection(X2,X3)),X3)|~member(esk1_2(X1,intersection(X2,X3)),X2)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[33,19,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(257,plain,(subset(intersection(X1,X2),X1)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[33,93,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(269,negated_conjecture,(~subset(esk4_0,intersection(esk4_0,esk4_0))|$false),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[87,257,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(270,negated_conjecture,(~subset(esk4_0,intersection(esk4_0,esk4_0))),inference(cn,[status(thm)],[269,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(518,plain,(subset(X1,intersection(X2,X1))|~member(esk1_2(X1,intersection(X2,X1)),X2)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[101,34,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(29229,plain,(subset(X1,intersection(X1,X1))),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[518,34,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(29244,negated_conjecture,($false),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[270,29229,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(29245,negated_conjecture,($false),inference(cn,[status(thm)],[29244,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(29246,negated_conjecture,($false),29245,['proof']).
% # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% # Processed clauses : 1769
% # ...of these trivial : 86
% # ...subsumed : 64
% # ...remaining for further processing: 1619
% # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 13
% # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% # Backward-subsumed : 0
% # Backward-rewritten : 29
% # Generated clauses : 27011
% # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 25150
% # Contextual simplify-reflections : 2
% # Paramodulations : 26978
% # Factorizations : 20
% # Equation resolutions : 13
% # Current number of processed clauses: 1557
% # Positive orientable unit clauses: 1306
% # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% # Negative unit clauses : 47
% # Non-unit-clauses : 204
% # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 17873
% # ...number of literals in the above : 33308
% # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1741
% # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1562
% # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 650
% # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% # Indexed BW rewrite attempts : 16246
% # Indexed BW rewrite successes : 29
% # Backwards rewriting index: 589 leaves, 4.85+/-6.950 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-from index: 220 leaves, 6.27+/-9.161 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-into index: 539 leaves, 5.07+/-7.047 terms/leaf
% # -------------------------------------------------
% # User time : 1.217 s
% # System time : 0.051 s
% # Total time : 1.268 s
% # Maximum resident set size: 0 pages
% PrfWatch: 1.74 CPU 1.81 WC
% FINAL PrfWatch: 1.74 CPU 1.81 WC
% SZS output end Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP4316/SET148+4.tptp
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------