TSTP Solution File: SET148+4 by SInE---0.4
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SInE---0.4
% Problem : SET148+4 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : Source/sine.py -e eprover -t %d %s
% Computer : art02.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Dec 26 02:50:51 EST 2010
% Result : Theorem 0.16s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.16s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 13
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 36 ( 12 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 113 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 7 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 130 ( 53 ~; 49 |; 24 &)
% ( 3 <=>; 1 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 9 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 1 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 67 ( 2 sgn 40 !; 4 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(1,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( subset(X1,X2)
<=> ! [X3] :
( member(X3,X1)
=> member(X3,X2) ) ),
file('/tmp/tmpfMd_u9/sel_SET148+4.p_1',subset) ).
fof(2,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( equal_set(X1,X2)
<=> ( subset(X1,X2)
& subset(X2,X1) ) ),
file('/tmp/tmpfMd_u9/sel_SET148+4.p_1',equal_set) ).
fof(3,axiom,
! [X3,X1,X2] :
( member(X3,intersection(X1,X2))
<=> ( member(X3,X1)
& member(X3,X2) ) ),
file('/tmp/tmpfMd_u9/sel_SET148+4.p_1',intersection) ).
fof(4,conjecture,
! [X1] : equal_set(intersection(X1,X1),X1),
file('/tmp/tmpfMd_u9/sel_SET148+4.p_1',thI13) ).
fof(5,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1] : equal_set(intersection(X1,X1),X1),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[4]) ).
fof(6,plain,
! [X1,X2] :
( ( ~ subset(X1,X2)
| ! [X3] :
( ~ member(X3,X1)
| member(X3,X2) ) )
& ( ? [X3] :
( member(X3,X1)
& ~ member(X3,X2) )
| subset(X1,X2) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[1]) ).
fof(7,plain,
! [X4,X5] :
( ( ~ subset(X4,X5)
| ! [X6] :
( ~ member(X6,X4)
| member(X6,X5) ) )
& ( ? [X7] :
( member(X7,X4)
& ~ member(X7,X5) )
| subset(X4,X5) ) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[6]) ).
fof(8,plain,
! [X4,X5] :
( ( ~ subset(X4,X5)
| ! [X6] :
( ~ member(X6,X4)
| member(X6,X5) ) )
& ( ( member(esk1_2(X4,X5),X4)
& ~ member(esk1_2(X4,X5),X5) )
| subset(X4,X5) ) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[7]) ).
fof(9,plain,
! [X4,X5,X6] :
( ( ~ member(X6,X4)
| member(X6,X5)
| ~ subset(X4,X5) )
& ( ( member(esk1_2(X4,X5),X4)
& ~ member(esk1_2(X4,X5),X5) )
| subset(X4,X5) ) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[8]) ).
fof(10,plain,
! [X4,X5,X6] :
( ( ~ member(X6,X4)
| member(X6,X5)
| ~ subset(X4,X5) )
& ( member(esk1_2(X4,X5),X4)
| subset(X4,X5) )
& ( ~ member(esk1_2(X4,X5),X5)
| subset(X4,X5) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[9]) ).
cnf(11,plain,
( subset(X1,X2)
| ~ member(esk1_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[10]) ).
cnf(12,plain,
( subset(X1,X2)
| member(esk1_2(X1,X2),X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[10]) ).
fof(14,plain,
! [X1,X2] :
( ( ~ equal_set(X1,X2)
| ( subset(X1,X2)
& subset(X2,X1) ) )
& ( ~ subset(X1,X2)
| ~ subset(X2,X1)
| equal_set(X1,X2) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[2]) ).
fof(15,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( ( ~ equal_set(X3,X4)
| ( subset(X3,X4)
& subset(X4,X3) ) )
& ( ~ subset(X3,X4)
| ~ subset(X4,X3)
| equal_set(X3,X4) ) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[14]) ).
fof(16,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( ( subset(X3,X4)
| ~ equal_set(X3,X4) )
& ( subset(X4,X3)
| ~ equal_set(X3,X4) )
& ( ~ subset(X3,X4)
| ~ subset(X4,X3)
| equal_set(X3,X4) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[15]) ).
cnf(17,plain,
( equal_set(X1,X2)
| ~ subset(X2,X1)
| ~ subset(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[16]) ).
fof(20,plain,
! [X3,X1,X2] :
( ( ~ member(X3,intersection(X1,X2))
| ( member(X3,X1)
& member(X3,X2) ) )
& ( ~ member(X3,X1)
| ~ member(X3,X2)
| member(X3,intersection(X1,X2)) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[3]) ).
fof(21,plain,
! [X4,X5,X6] :
( ( ~ member(X4,intersection(X5,X6))
| ( member(X4,X5)
& member(X4,X6) ) )
& ( ~ member(X4,X5)
| ~ member(X4,X6)
| member(X4,intersection(X5,X6)) ) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[20]) ).
fof(22,plain,
! [X4,X5,X6] :
( ( member(X4,X5)
| ~ member(X4,intersection(X5,X6)) )
& ( member(X4,X6)
| ~ member(X4,intersection(X5,X6)) )
& ( ~ member(X4,X5)
| ~ member(X4,X6)
| member(X4,intersection(X5,X6)) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[21]) ).
cnf(23,plain,
( member(X1,intersection(X2,X3))
| ~ member(X1,X3)
| ~ member(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[22]) ).
cnf(24,plain,
( member(X1,X3)
| ~ member(X1,intersection(X2,X3)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[22]) ).
fof(26,negated_conjecture,
? [X1] : ~ equal_set(intersection(X1,X1),X1),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[5]) ).
fof(27,negated_conjecture,
? [X2] : ~ equal_set(intersection(X2,X2),X2),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[26]) ).
fof(28,negated_conjecture,
~ equal_set(intersection(esk2_0,esk2_0),esk2_0),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[27]) ).
cnf(29,negated_conjecture,
~ equal_set(intersection(esk2_0,esk2_0),esk2_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[28]) ).
cnf(30,negated_conjecture,
( ~ subset(esk2_0,intersection(esk2_0,esk2_0))
| ~ subset(intersection(esk2_0,esk2_0),esk2_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[29,17,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(33,plain,
( member(esk1_2(intersection(X1,X2),X3),X2)
| subset(intersection(X1,X2),X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[24,12,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(38,plain,
( subset(X1,intersection(X2,X3))
| ~ member(esk1_2(X1,intersection(X2,X3)),X3)
| ~ member(esk1_2(X1,intersection(X2,X3)),X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[11,23,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(42,plain,
subset(intersection(X1,X2),X2),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[11,33,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(44,negated_conjecture,
( ~ subset(esk2_0,intersection(esk2_0,esk2_0))
| $false ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[30,42,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(45,negated_conjecture,
~ subset(esk2_0,intersection(esk2_0,esk2_0)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[44,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(49,plain,
( subset(X1,intersection(X2,X1))
| ~ member(esk1_2(X1,intersection(X2,X1)),X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[38,12,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(107,plain,
subset(X1,intersection(X1,X1)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[49,12,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(116,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[45,107,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(117,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[116,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(118,negated_conjecture,
$false,
117,
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% % SZS status Started for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/SET/SET148+4.p
% --creating new selector for [SET006+0.ax]
% -running prover on /tmp/tmpfMd_u9/sel_SET148+4.p_1 with time limit 29
% -prover status Theorem
% Problem SET148+4.p solved in phase 0.
% % SZS status Theorem for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/SET/SET148+4.p
% % SZS status Ended for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/SET/SET148+4.p
% Solved 1 out of 1.
% # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% # SZS status Theorem
% # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% See solution above
% # SZS output end CNFRefutation
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------