TSTP Solution File: SET148+4 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : SET148+4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:56:05 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 21.89s 10.96s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 21.93s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :   20
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   35 (   6 unt;  16 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   38 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   31 (  12   ~;  13   |;   2   &)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   24 (  14   >;  10   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   13 (  13 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   36 (;  36   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ subset > member > equal_set > unordered_pair > union > intersection > difference > #nlpp > sum > singleton > product > power_set > empty_set > #skF_3 > #skF_4 > #skF_2 > #skF_1

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(equal_set,type,
    equal_set: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(power_set,type,
    power_set: $i > $i ).

tff(product,type,
    product: $i > $i ).

tff(singleton,type,
    singleton: $i > $i ).

tff(unordered_pair,type,
    unordered_pair: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(sum,type,
    sum: $i > $i ).

tff(intersection,type,
    intersection: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(union,type,
    union: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_3',type,
    '#skF_3': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(subset,type,
    subset: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(member,type,
    member: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(empty_set,type,
    empty_set: $i ).

tff('#skF_4',type,
    '#skF_4': $i ).

tff('#skF_2',type,
    '#skF_2': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(difference,type,
    difference: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_1',type,
    '#skF_1': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(f_56,axiom,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( subset(A,B)
    <=> ! [X] :
          ( member(X,A)
         => member(X,B) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET006+0.ax',subset) ).

tff(f_72,axiom,
    ! [X,A,B] :
      ( member(X,intersection(A,B))
    <=> ( member(X,A)
        & member(X,B) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET006+0.ax',intersection) ).

tff(f_62,axiom,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( equal_set(A,B)
    <=> ( subset(A,B)
        & subset(B,A) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET006+0.ax',equal_set) ).

tff(f_117,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A] : equal_set(intersection(A,A),A),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',thI13) ).

tff(c_100,plain,
    ! [A_68,B_69] :
      ( member('#skF_1'(A_68,B_69),A_68)
      | subset(A_68,B_69) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_56]) ).

tff(c_22,plain,
    ! [X_10,A_11,B_12] :
      ( member(X_10,A_11)
      | ~ member(X_10,intersection(A_11,B_12)) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_72]) ).

tff(c_6219,plain,
    ! [A_363,B_364,B_365] :
      ( member('#skF_1'(intersection(A_363,B_364),B_365),A_363)
      | subset(intersection(A_363,B_364),B_365) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_100,c_22]) ).

tff(c_4,plain,
    ! [A_1,B_2] :
      ( ~ member('#skF_1'(A_1,B_2),B_2)
      | subset(A_1,B_2) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_56]) ).

tff(c_6336,plain,
    ! [A_363,B_364] : subset(intersection(A_363,B_364),A_363),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_6219,c_4]) ).

tff(c_6,plain,
    ! [A_1,B_2] :
      ( member('#skF_1'(A_1,B_2),A_1)
      | subset(A_1,B_2) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_56]) ).

tff(c_638,plain,
    ! [X_126,A_127,B_128] :
      ( member(X_126,intersection(A_127,B_128))
      | ~ member(X_126,B_128)
      | ~ member(X_126,A_127) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_72]) ).

tff(c_19971,plain,
    ! [A_842,A_843,B_844] :
      ( subset(A_842,intersection(A_843,B_844))
      | ~ member('#skF_1'(A_842,intersection(A_843,B_844)),B_844)
      | ~ member('#skF_1'(A_842,intersection(A_843,B_844)),A_843) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_638,c_4]) ).

tff(c_41782,plain,
    ! [A_1287,A_1288] :
      ( ~ member('#skF_1'(A_1287,intersection(A_1288,A_1287)),A_1288)
      | subset(A_1287,intersection(A_1288,A_1287)) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_6,c_19971]) ).

tff(c_42347,plain,
    ! [A_1289] : subset(A_1289,intersection(A_1289,A_1289)),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_6,c_41782]) ).

tff(c_8,plain,
    ! [A_6,B_7] :
      ( equal_set(A_6,B_7)
      | ~ subset(B_7,A_6)
      | ~ subset(A_6,B_7) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_62]) ).

tff(c_42403,plain,
    ! [A_1289] :
      ( equal_set(intersection(A_1289,A_1289),A_1289)
      | ~ subset(intersection(A_1289,A_1289),A_1289) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_42347,c_8]) ).

tff(c_42430,plain,
    ! [A_1289] : equal_set(intersection(A_1289,A_1289),A_1289),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_6336,c_42403]) ).

tff(c_60,plain,
    ~ equal_set(intersection('#skF_4','#skF_4'),'#skF_4'),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_117]) ).

tff(c_42435,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_42430,c_60]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem  : SET148+4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.00/0.14  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 16:17:37 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 21.89/10.96  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 21.89/10.96  
% 21.89/10.96  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 21.93/10.98  
% 21.93/10.98  Inference rules
% 21.93/10.98  ----------------------
% 21.93/10.98  #Ref     : 0
% 21.93/10.98  #Sup     : 9724
% 21.93/10.98  #Fact    : 6
% 21.93/10.98  #Define  : 0
% 21.93/10.98  #Split   : 1
% 21.93/10.98  #Chain   : 0
% 21.93/10.98  #Close   : 0
% 21.93/10.98  
% 21.93/10.98  Ordering : KBO
% 21.93/10.98  
% 21.93/10.98  Simplification rules
% 21.93/10.98  ----------------------
% 21.93/10.98  #Subsume      : 712
% 21.93/10.99  #Demod        : 1669
% 21.93/10.99  #Tautology    : 1687
% 21.93/10.99  #SimpNegUnit  : 54
% 21.93/10.99  #BackRed      : 4
% 21.93/10.99  
% 21.93/10.99  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 21.93/10.99  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 21.93/10.99  
% 21.93/10.99  Timing (in seconds)
% 21.93/10.99  ----------------------
% 21.93/10.99  Preprocessing        : 0.51
% 21.93/10.99  Parsing              : 0.27
% 21.93/10.99  CNF conversion       : 0.04
% 21.93/10.99  Main loop            : 9.43
% 21.93/10.99  Inferencing          : 1.61
% 21.93/10.99  Reduction            : 4.52
% 21.93/10.99  Demodulation         : 3.52
% 21.93/10.99  BG Simplification    : 0.09
% 21.93/10.99  Subsumption          : 2.58
% 21.93/10.99  Abstraction          : 0.11
% 21.93/10.99  MUC search           : 0.00
% 21.93/10.99  Cooper               : 0.00
% 21.93/10.99  Total                : 9.98
% 21.93/10.99  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 21.93/10.99  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 21.93/10.99  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 21.93/10.99  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------