TSTP Solution File: SET148+3 by Duper---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Duper---1.0
% Problem  : SET148+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : duper %s

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 14:45:50 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 3.50s 3.68s
% Output   : Proof 3.50s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.14  % Problem    : SET148+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.00/0.15  % Command    : duper %s
% 0.15/0.37  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.37  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.37  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.37  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.37  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.37  % DateTime   : Sat Aug 26 09:44:33 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.37  % CPUTime    : 
% 3.50/3.68  SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.50/3.68  SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 3.50/3.68  Clause #0 (by assumption #[]): Eq (∀ (B C : Iota), subset B C → Eq (intersection B C) B) True
% 3.50/3.68  Clause #5 (by assumption #[]): Eq (∀ (B : Iota), subset B B) True
% 3.50/3.68  Clause #7 (by assumption #[]): Eq (Not (∀ (B : Iota), Eq (intersection B B) B)) True
% 3.50/3.68  Clause #8 (by clausification #[5]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (subset a a) True
% 3.50/3.68  Clause #9 (by clausification #[7]): Eq (∀ (B : Iota), Eq (intersection B B) B) False
% 3.50/3.68  Clause #10 (by clausification #[9]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (Not (Eq (intersection (skS.0 0 a) (skS.0 0 a)) (skS.0 0 a))) True
% 3.50/3.68  Clause #11 (by clausification #[10]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (Eq (intersection (skS.0 0 a) (skS.0 0 a)) (skS.0 0 a)) False
% 3.50/3.68  Clause #12 (by clausification #[11]): ∀ (a : Iota), Ne (intersection (skS.0 0 a) (skS.0 0 a)) (skS.0 0 a)
% 3.50/3.68  Clause #13 (by clausification #[0]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (∀ (C : Iota), subset a C → Eq (intersection a C) a) True
% 3.50/3.68  Clause #14 (by clausification #[13]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Eq (subset a a_1 → Eq (intersection a a_1) a) True
% 3.50/3.68  Clause #15 (by clausification #[14]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Or (Eq (subset a a_1) False) (Eq (Eq (intersection a a_1) a) True)
% 3.50/3.68  Clause #16 (by clausification #[15]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Or (Eq (subset a a_1) False) (Eq (intersection a a_1) a)
% 3.50/3.68  Clause #17 (by superposition #[16, 8]): ∀ (a : Iota), Or (Eq (intersection a a) a) (Eq False True)
% 3.50/3.68  Clause #18 (by clausification #[17]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (intersection a a) a
% 3.50/3.68  Clause #20 (by backward contextual literal cutting #[18, 12]): False
% 3.50/3.68  SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------