TSTP Solution File: SET118-7 by SnakeForV---1.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SnakeForV---1.0
% Problem : SET118-7 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 18:19:22 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.51s
% Output : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 2
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 7 ( 5 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 10 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 8 ( 5 ~; 3 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 11 ( 11 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f172,plain,
$false,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f171,f166]) ).
fof(f166,plain,
! [X2,X0,X1] : ~ member(ordered_pair(x,X0),cross_product(X1,X2)),
inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f165,f94]) ).
fof(f94,axiom,
! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
( ~ member(ordered_pair(X2,X3),cross_product(X0,X1))
| member(X2,universal_class) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',corollary_1_to_cartesian_product) ).
fof(f165,axiom,
~ member(x,universal_class),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_corollary_2_to_ordered_pairs_are_sets_2) ).
fof(f171,plain,
member(ordered_pair(x,x),cross_product(cross_product(universal_class,universal_class),cross_product(universal_class,universal_class))),
inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f164,f164,f16]) ).
fof(f16,axiom,
! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
( member(ordered_pair(X2,X3),cross_product(X0,X1))
| ~ member(X3,X1)
| ~ member(X2,X0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cartesian_product3) ).
fof(f164,axiom,
member(x,cross_product(universal_class,universal_class)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_corollary_2_to_ordered_pairs_are_sets_1) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SET118-7 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Aug 30 12:43:50 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.49 % (31644)lrs+10_5:1_br=off:fde=none:nwc=3.0:sd=1:sgt=10:sos=on:ss=axioms:urr=on:i=34:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/34Mi)
% 0.19/0.49 % (31644)First to succeed.
% 0.19/0.50 % (31658)lrs+1003_1:1024_add=large:afr=on:cond=fast:fsr=off:gs=on:sos=on:sp=reverse_arity:i=28:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/28Mi)
% 0.19/0.51 % (31644)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.19/0.51 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.51 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.51 % (31644)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.51 % (31644)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.19/0.51 % (31644)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.19/0.51 % (31644)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.19/0.51
% 0.19/0.51 % (31644)Memory used [KB]: 5884
% 0.19/0.51 % (31644)Time elapsed: 0.084 s
% 0.19/0.51 % (31644)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.19/0.51 % (31644)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.51 % (31644)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.51 % (31636)Success in time 0.161 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------