TSTP Solution File: SET118-7 by SNARK---20120808r022

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : SET118-7 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 05:07:36 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.40s 0.60s
% Output   : Refutation 0.40s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    1
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    5 (   4 unt;   0 nHn;   4 RR)
%            Number of literals    :    7 (   0 equ;   3 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    4 (   1 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(subclass_members,axiom,
    ( ~ subclass(X,Y)
    | ~ member(Z,X)
    | member(Z,Y) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',subclass_members) ).

cnf(class_elements_are_sets,axiom,
    subclass(X,universal_class),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',class_elements_are_sets) ).

cnf(prove_corollary_2_to_ordered_pairs_are_sets_1,negated_conjecture,
    member(x,cross_product(universal_class,universal_class)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_corollary_2_to_ordered_pairs_are_sets_1) ).

cnf(prove_corollary_2_to_ordered_pairs_are_sets_2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ member(x,universal_class),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_corollary_2_to_ordered_pairs_are_sets_2) ).

cnf(268,plain,
    $false,
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[subclass_members,class_elements_are_sets,prove_corollary_2_to_ordered_pairs_are_sets_1,prove_corollary_2_to_ordered_pairs_are_sets_2]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12  % Problem  : SET118-7 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.04/0.13  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Sat Jul  9 23:17:07 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.47  /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.48  * 
% 0.20/0.48  * 
% 0.20/0.48  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.20/0.48  * 
% 0.20/0.48  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.20/0.48  * 
% 0.20/0.48  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.20/0.48   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.20/0.48   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.20/0.48   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.20/0.48   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.20/0.48   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.20/0.48   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.20/0.48  * 
% 0.20/0.48  "."
% 0.20/0.48  * 
% 0.20/0.48  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-09T23:17:07
% 0.20/0.48  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n021.cluster.edu at 2022-07-09T23:17:07
% 0.20/0.53  
% 0.20/0.53  ; Recognized commutativity assertion (= (|unordered_pair| ?X ?Y) (|unordered_pair| ?Y ?X)).
% 0.40/0.60  ; Declaring unordered_pair to be commutative.
% 0.40/0.60  
% 0.40/0.60  #||
% 0.40/0.60  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.40/0.60  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.40/0.60  ||#
% 0.40/0.60  
% 0.40/0.60  ; Summary of computation:
% 0.40/0.60  ;       394 formulas have been input or derived (from 50 formulas).
% 0.40/0.60  ;       268 (68%) were retained.  Of these,
% 0.40/0.60  ;           70 (26%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.40/0.60  ;          198 (74%) are still being kept.
% 0.40/0.60  ; 
% 0.40/0.60  ; Run time in seconds:
% 0.40/0.60  ;     0.029  25%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 0.40/0.60  ;     0.006   5%   Assert                       (165 calls)
% 0.40/0.60  ;     0.029  25%   Process new row              (304 calls)
% 0.40/0.60  ;     0.003   3%   Resolution                   (98 calls)
% 0.40/0.60  ;     0.001   1%   Paramodulation               (49 calls)
% 0.40/0.60  ;     0.000   0%   Factoring                    (4 calls)
% 0.40/0.60  ;     0.002   2%   Condensing                   (183 calls)
% 0.40/0.60  ;     0.010   8%   Forward subsumption          (183 calls)
% 0.40/0.60  ;     0.006   5%   Backward subsumption         (171 calls)
% 0.40/0.60  ;     0.001   1%   Clause clause subsumption    (124 calls)
% 0.40/0.60  ;     0.009   8%   Forward simplification       (303 calls)
% 0.40/0.60  ;     0.003   3%   Backward simplification      (251 calls)
% 0.40/0.60  ;     0.001   1%   Ordering                     (113 calls)
% 0.40/0.60  ;     0.000   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 0.40/0.60  ;     0.000   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 0.40/0.60  ;     0.018  15%   Other
% 0.40/0.60  ;     0.118        Total
% 0.40/0.60  ;     0.118        Real time
% 0.40/0.60  ; 
% 0.40/0.60  ; Term-hash-array has 648 terms in all.
% 0.40/0.60  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 129 entries (129 at peak, 171 added, 42 deleted).
% 0.40/0.60  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 940 nodes (940 at peak, 1,178 added, 238 deleted).
% 0.40/0.60  ;  Retrieved 101 possibly forward subsuming rows in 183 calls.
% 0.40/0.60  ;  Retrieved 40 possibly backward subsumed rows in 171 calls.
% 0.40/0.60  ; Path-index has 576 entries (576 at peak, 703 added, 127 deleted).
% 0.40/0.60  ; Path-index has 2,873 nodes (2,873 at peak, 3,038 added, 165 deleted).
% 0.40/0.60  ; Trie-index has 576 entries (576 at peak, 703 added, 127 deleted).
% 0.40/0.60  ; Trie-index has 2,686 nodes (2,686 at peak, 3,031 added, 345 deleted).
% 0.40/0.60  ; Retrieved 317 generalization terms in 1,321 calls.
% 0.40/0.60  ; Retrieved 199 instance terms in 79 calls.
% 0.40/0.60  ; Retrieved 2,961 unifiable terms in 289 calls.
% 0.40/0.60  ; 
% 0.40/0.60  ; The agenda of rows to process has 53 entries:
% 0.40/0.60  ;    18 with value 5               5 with value 12               1 with value 17
% 0.40/0.60  ;     5 with value 7               2 with value 13               2 with value 18
% 0.40/0.60  ;     4 with value 8               3 with value 14               4 with value 19
% 0.40/0.60  ;     5 with value 11              1 with value 15               3 with value 20
% 0.40/0.60  ; The agenda of input rows to give has 102 entries:
% 0.40/0.60  ;    13 with value 12              3 with value 30               1 with value 48
% 0.40/0.60  ;     5 with value 13              1 with value 31               2 with value 53
% 0.40/0.60  ;     8 with value 14              1 with value 32               1 with value 56
% 0.40/0.60  ;     7 with value 15              1 with value 33               1 with value 57
% 0.40/0.60  ;     5 with value 16              5 with value 35               2 with value 62
% 0.40/0.60  ;     2 with value 17              1 with value 36               1 with value 64
% 0.40/0.60  ;     6 with value 18              1 with value 37               1 with value 66
% 0.40/0.60  ;     3 with value 19              4 with value 39               1 with value 74
% 0.40/0.60  ;     4 with value 20              1 with value 40               2 with value 94
% 0.40/0.60  ;     2 with value 22              2 with value 41               1 with value 123
% 0.40/0.60  ;     3 with value 23              1 with value 43               2 with value 139
% 0.40/0.60  ;     1 with value 27              4 with value 46               2 with value 212
% 0.40/0.60  ;     1 with value 28
% 0.40/0.60  ; The agenda of rows to give has 47 entries:
% 0.40/0.60  ;     1 with value (4 4)           3 with value (4 10)           1 with value (4 15)
% 0.40/0.60  ;     1 with value (4 5)           1 with value (4 11)           2 with value (4 16)
% 0.40/0.60  ;    10 with value (4 7)           6 with value (4 13)           3 with value (4 17)
% 0.40/0.60  ;     7 with value (4 8)           4 with value (4 14)           3 with value (4 18)
% 0.40/0.60  ;     5 with value (4 9)
% 0.40/0.60  Evaluation took:
% 0.40/0.60    0.119 seconds of real time
% 0.40/0.60    0.109994 seconds of user run time
% 0.40/0.60    0.009184 seconds of system run time
% 0.40/0.60    0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.40/0.60    0 page faults and
% 0.40/0.60    6,956,336 bytes consed.
% 0.40/0.60  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.40/0.60  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-09T23:17:07
% 0.40/0.60  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.40/0.60  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------