TSTP Solution File: SET117+1 by SRASS---0.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SRASS---0.1
% Problem  : SET117+1 : TPTP v5.3.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : SRASS -q2 -a 0 10 10 10 -i3 -n60 %s

% Computer : helena.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU          6600  @ 2.40GHz @ 2400MHz
% Memory   : 1003MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.32.26-175.fc12.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Jun 15 11:08:48 EDT 2012

% Result   : Theorem 0.32s
% Output   : Solution 0.32s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ERROR: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Reading problem from /tmp/SystemOnTPTP12886/SET117+1.tptp
% Adding relevance values
% Extracting the conjecture
% Sorting axioms by relevance
% Looking for THM       ... found
% SZS status THM for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP12886/SET117+1.tptp
% SZS output start Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP12886/SET117+1.tptp
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% TreeLimitedRun: /home/graph/tptp/Systems/EP---1.5/eproof_ram --print-statistics -xAuto -tAuto --cpu-limit=60 --memory-limit=Auto --tstp-format /tmp/SRASS.s.p 
% TreeLimitedRun: CPU time limit is 60s
% TreeLimitedRun: WC  time limit is 120s
% TreeLimitedRun: PID is 12984
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% PrfWatch: 0.00 CPU 0.01 WC
% # Auto-Ordering is analysing problem.
% # Problem is type GHSMNFFMM21MD
% # Auto-mode selected ordering type KBO6
% # Auto-mode selected ordering precedence scheme <invfreqconjmax>
% # Auto-mode selected weight ordering scheme <invfreqrank>
% #
% # Auto-Heuristic is analysing problem.
% # Problem is type GHSMNFFMM21MD
% # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___107_C45_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_S0Y
% # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred.
% #
% # Initializing proof state
% # Scanning for AC axioms
% # Proof found!
% # SZS status Theorem
% # Parsed axioms                      : 44
% # Removed by relevancy pruning       : 0
% # Initial clauses                    : 91
% # Removed in clause preprocessing    : 8
% # Initial clauses in saturation      : 83
% # Processed clauses                  : 41
% # ...of these trivial                : 0
% # ...subsumed                        : 0
% # ...remaining for further processing: 41
% # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 4
% # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% # Backward-subsumed                  : 0
% # Backward-rewritten                 : 0
% # Generated clauses                  : 59
% # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 54
% # Contextual simplify-reflections    : 0
% # Paramodulations                    : 55
% # Factorizations                     : 0
% # Equation resolutions               : 4
% # Current number of processed clauses: 37
% #    Positive orientable unit clauses: 9
% #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% #    Negative unit clauses           : 2
% #    Non-unit-clauses                : 26
% # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 96
% # ...number of literals in the above : 207
% # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 55
% # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 54
% # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions: 0
% # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound  : 0
% # BW rewrite match attempts          : 0
% # BW rewrite match successes         : 0
% # Backwards rewriting index :   389 nodes,    62 leaves,   1.13+/-0.335 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-from index      :   119 nodes,    19 leaves,   1.05+/-0.223 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-into index      :   289 nodes,    44 leaves,   1.09+/-0.287 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-neg-atom index  :    66 nodes,    11 leaves,   1.09+/-0.287 terms/leaf
% # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% fof(13, axiom,![X1]:![X2]:member(unordered_pair(X1,X2),universal_class),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', unordered_pair)).
% fof(14, axiom,![X1]:![X2]:ordered_pair(X1,X2)=unordered_pair(singleton(X1),unordered_pair(X1,singleton(X2))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', ordered_pair_defn)).
% fof(25, axiom,![X1]:singleton(X1)=unordered_pair(X1,X1),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', singleton_set_defn)).
% fof(44, conjecture,![X1]:(ordered_pair(first(X1),second(X1))=X1=>member(X1,universal_class)),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', corollary_1_to_ordered_pairs_are_sets)).
% fof(45, negated_conjecture,~(![X1]:(ordered_pair(first(X1),second(X1))=X1=>member(X1,universal_class))),inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[44])).
% fof(141, plain,![X3]:![X4]:member(unordered_pair(X3,X4),universal_class),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[13])).
% cnf(142,plain,(member(unordered_pair(X1,X2),universal_class)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[141])).
% fof(143, plain,![X3]:![X4]:ordered_pair(X3,X4)=unordered_pair(singleton(X3),unordered_pair(X3,singleton(X4))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[14])).
% cnf(144,plain,(ordered_pair(X1,X2)=unordered_pair(singleton(X1),unordered_pair(X1,singleton(X2)))),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[143])).
% fof(195, plain,![X2]:singleton(X2)=unordered_pair(X2,X2),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[25])).
% cnf(196,plain,(singleton(X1)=unordered_pair(X1,X1)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[195])).
% fof(273, negated_conjecture,?[X1]:(ordered_pair(first(X1),second(X1))=X1&~(member(X1,universal_class))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[45])).
% fof(274, negated_conjecture,?[X2]:(ordered_pair(first(X2),second(X2))=X2&~(member(X2,universal_class))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[273])).
% fof(275, negated_conjecture,(ordered_pair(first(esk8_0),second(esk8_0))=esk8_0&~(member(esk8_0,universal_class))),inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[274])).
% cnf(276,negated_conjecture,(~member(esk8_0,universal_class)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[275])).
% cnf(277,negated_conjecture,(ordered_pair(first(esk8_0),second(esk8_0))=esk8_0),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[275])).
% cnf(280,plain,(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X1),unordered_pair(X1,unordered_pair(X2,X2)))=ordered_pair(X1,X2)),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[144,196,theory(equality)]),196,theory(equality)]),['unfolding']).
% cnf(306,negated_conjecture,(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(first(esk8_0),first(esk8_0)),unordered_pair(first(esk8_0),unordered_pair(second(esk8_0),second(esk8_0))))=esk8_0),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[277,280,theory(equality)]),['unfolding']).
% cnf(387,negated_conjecture,(member(esk8_0,universal_class)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[142,306,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(390,negated_conjecture,($false),inference(sr,[status(thm)],[387,276,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(391,negated_conjecture,($false),390,['proof']).
% # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% PrfWatch: 0.02 CPU 0.06 WC
% FINAL PrfWatch: 0.02 CPU 0.06 WC
% SZS output end Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP12886/SET117+1.tptp
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------