TSTP Solution File: SET114-7 by SnakeForV---1.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SnakeForV---1.0
% Problem : SET114-7 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s
% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 18:19:21 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.52s
% Output : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 2
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 5 ( 4 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 6 ( 3 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 3 ( 2 ~; 1 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 1 ( 1 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f176,plain,
$false,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f165,f161]) ).
fof(f161,axiom,
x != second(x),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_unique_2nd_in_pair_of_non_sets) ).
fof(f165,plain,
x = second(x),
inference(resolution,[],[f160,f155]) ).
fof(f155,axiom,
! [X0] :
( member(ordered_pair(first(X0),second(X0)),cross_product(universal_class,universal_class))
| second(X0) = X0 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',existence_of_1st_and_2nd_3) ).
fof(f160,axiom,
~ member(ordered_pair(first(x),second(x)),cross_product(universal_class,universal_class)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_unique_1st_and_2nd_in_pair_of_non_sets2_1) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.05/0.13 % Problem : SET114-7 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.05/0.14 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Tue Aug 30 13:21:04 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.49 % (3372)dis+21_1:1_av=off:er=filter:slsq=on:slsqc=0:slsqr=1,1:sp=frequency:to=lpo:i=49:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/49Mi)
% 0.20/0.50 % (3367)dis+21_1:1_av=off:fd=off:lcm=predicate:sos=on:spb=goal:urr=ec_only:i=42:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/42Mi)
% 0.20/0.50 % (3375)lrs+1010_1:1_bd=off:fd=off:fde=none:ins=3:sac=on:sos=on:spb=goal:to=lpo:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/51Mi)
% 0.20/0.51 % (3370)lrs+10_5:1_br=off:fde=none:nwc=3.0:sd=1:sgt=10:sos=on:ss=axioms:urr=on:i=34:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/34Mi)
% 0.20/0.51 % (3368)lrs+10_1:16_awrs=converge:awrsf=40:br=off:ep=RSTC:flr=on:gsp=on:nwc=3.0:sos=on:urr=on:i=4:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/4Mi)
% 0.20/0.51 % (3371)dis+1011_1:16_fsr=off:nwc=2.0:i=25:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/25Mi)
% 0.20/0.51 % (3375)First to succeed.
% 0.20/0.52 % (3375)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.20/0.52 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.52 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.52 % (3375)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.52 % (3375)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.20/0.52 % (3375)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.20/0.52 % (3375)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.20/0.52
% 0.20/0.52 % (3375)Memory used [KB]: 6012
% 0.20/0.52 % (3375)Time elapsed: 0.106 s
% 0.20/0.52 % (3375)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.20/0.52 % (3375)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.52 % (3375)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.52 % (3361)Success in time 0.158 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------