TSTP Solution File: SET108-7 by iProver---3.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.8
% Problem  : SET108-7 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 15:06:35 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 3.81s 1.14s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.81s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    6 (   5 unt;   0 nHn;   6 RR)
%            Number of literals    :    7 (   2 equ;   3 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    3 (   2 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_110,negated_conjecture,
    member(ordered_pair(y,z),cross_product(universal_class,universal_class)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_existence_of_1st_and_2nd_1_1) ).

cnf(c_111,negated_conjecture,
    ~ member(ordered_pair(first(ordered_pair(y,z)),second(ordered_pair(y,z))),cross_product(universal_class,universal_class)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_existence_of_1st_and_2nd_1_2) ).

cnf(c_128,plain,
    ( ~ member(X0,cross_product(X1,X2))
    | ordered_pair(first(X0),second(X0)) = X0 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',cartesian_product4) ).

cnf(c_10227,plain,
    ordered_pair(first(ordered_pair(y,z)),second(ordered_pair(y,z))) = ordered_pair(y,z),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_110,c_128]) ).

cnf(c_10250,plain,
    ~ member(ordered_pair(y,z),cross_product(universal_class,universal_class)),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_111,c_10227]) ).

cnf(c_10251,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_10250,c_110]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : SET108-7 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.34  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % DateTime : Sat Aug 26 12:47:45 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.17/0.45  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.17/0.46  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 3.81/1.14  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 3.81/1.14  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 3.81/1.14  
% 3.81/1.14  %---------------- iProver v3.8 (pre SMT-COMP 2023/CASC 2023) ----------------%
% 3.81/1.14  
% 3.81/1.14  ------  iProver source info
% 3.81/1.14  
% 3.81/1.14  git: date: 2023-05-31 18:12:56 +0000
% 3.81/1.14  git: sha1: 8abddc1f627fd3ce0bcb8b4cbf113b3cc443d7b6
% 3.81/1.14  git: non_committed_changes: false
% 3.81/1.14  git: last_make_outside_of_git: false
% 3.81/1.14  
% 3.81/1.14  ------ Parsing...successful
% 3.81/1.14  
% 3.81/1.14  
% 3.81/1.14  
% 3.81/1.14  ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 2  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe:1:0s pe:2:0s pe_e  sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 2 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e 
% 3.81/1.14  
% 3.81/1.14  ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e 
% 3.81/1.14  
% 3.81/1.14  ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 3.81/1.14  ------ Proving...
% 3.81/1.14  ------ Problem Properties 
% 3.81/1.14  
% 3.81/1.14  
% 3.81/1.14  clauses                                 144
% 3.81/1.14  conjectures                             2
% 3.81/1.14  EPR                                     17
% 3.81/1.14  Horn                                    117
% 3.81/1.14  unary                                   47
% 3.81/1.14  binary                                  57
% 3.81/1.14  lits                                    288
% 3.81/1.14  lits eq                                 90
% 3.81/1.14  fd_pure                                 0
% 3.81/1.14  fd_pseudo                               0
% 3.81/1.14  fd_cond                                 5
% 3.81/1.14  fd_pseudo_cond                          16
% 3.81/1.14  AC symbols                              0
% 3.81/1.14  
% 3.81/1.14  ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 3.81/1.14  
% 3.81/1.14  ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 3.81/1.14  
% 3.81/1.14  
% 3.81/1.14  ------ 
% 3.81/1.14  Current options:
% 3.81/1.14  ------ 
% 3.81/1.14  
% 3.81/1.14  
% 3.81/1.14  
% 3.81/1.14  
% 3.81/1.14  ------ Proving...
% 3.81/1.14  
% 3.81/1.14  
% 3.81/1.14  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 3.81/1.14  
% 3.81/1.14  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.81/1.14  
% 3.81/1.14  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------