TSTP Solution File: SET108+1 by SInE---0.4

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SInE---0.4
% Problem  : SET108+1 : TPTP v5.3.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : Source/sine.py -e eprover -t %d %s

% Computer : monitor.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU          6600  @ 2.40GHz @ 2400MHz
% Memory   : 1003MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.32.26-175.fc12.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Jun 15 08:07:20 EDT 2012

% Result   : Theorem 0.07s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.07s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   14
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   24 (   4 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   91 (  16 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   12 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  121 (  54   ~;  41   |;  24   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   3 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   42 (   4 sgn  12   !;  14   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(2,conjecture,
    ! [X3] :
    ? [X1,X2] :
      ( ( member(X1,universal_class)
        & member(X2,universal_class)
        & equal(X3,ordered_pair(X1,X2)) )
      | ( ~ ? [X4,X5] :
              ( member(X4,universal_class)
              & member(X5,universal_class)
              & equal(X3,ordered_pair(X4,X5)) )
        & equal(X1,X3)
        & equal(X2,X3) ) ),
    file('/tmp/tmpRU7xFi/sel_SET108+1.p_1',existence_of_first_and_second) ).

fof(3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X3] :
      ? [X1,X2] :
        ( ( member(X1,universal_class)
          & member(X2,universal_class)
          & equal(X3,ordered_pair(X1,X2)) )
        | ( ~ ? [X4,X5] :
                ( member(X4,universal_class)
                & member(X5,universal_class)
                & equal(X3,ordered_pair(X4,X5)) )
          & equal(X1,X3)
          & equal(X2,X3) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[2]) ).

fof(10,negated_conjecture,
    ? [X3] :
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ( ~ member(X1,universal_class)
        | ~ member(X2,universal_class)
        | ~ equal(X3,ordered_pair(X1,X2)) )
      & ( ? [X4,X5] :
            ( member(X4,universal_class)
            & member(X5,universal_class)
            & equal(X3,ordered_pair(X4,X5)) )
        | ~ equal(X1,X3)
        | ~ equal(X2,X3) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

fof(11,negated_conjecture,
    ? [X6] :
    ! [X7,X8] :
      ( ( ~ member(X7,universal_class)
        | ~ member(X8,universal_class)
        | ~ equal(X6,ordered_pair(X7,X8)) )
      & ( ? [X9,X10] :
            ( member(X9,universal_class)
            & member(X10,universal_class)
            & equal(X6,ordered_pair(X9,X10)) )
        | ~ equal(X7,X6)
        | ~ equal(X8,X6) ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[10]) ).

fof(12,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X7,X8] :
      ( ( ~ member(X7,universal_class)
        | ~ member(X8,universal_class)
        | ~ equal(esk1_0,ordered_pair(X7,X8)) )
      & ( ( member(esk2_2(X7,X8),universal_class)
          & member(esk3_2(X7,X8),universal_class)
          & equal(esk1_0,ordered_pair(esk2_2(X7,X8),esk3_2(X7,X8))) )
        | ~ equal(X7,esk1_0)
        | ~ equal(X8,esk1_0) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[11]) ).

fof(13,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X7,X8] :
      ( ( ~ member(X7,universal_class)
        | ~ member(X8,universal_class)
        | ~ equal(esk1_0,ordered_pair(X7,X8)) )
      & ( member(esk2_2(X7,X8),universal_class)
        | ~ equal(X7,esk1_0)
        | ~ equal(X8,esk1_0) )
      & ( member(esk3_2(X7,X8),universal_class)
        | ~ equal(X7,esk1_0)
        | ~ equal(X8,esk1_0) )
      & ( equal(esk1_0,ordered_pair(esk2_2(X7,X8),esk3_2(X7,X8)))
        | ~ equal(X7,esk1_0)
        | ~ equal(X8,esk1_0) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[12]) ).

cnf(14,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk1_0 = ordered_pair(esk2_2(X2,X1),esk3_2(X2,X1))
    | X1 != esk1_0
    | X2 != esk1_0 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[13]) ).

cnf(15,negated_conjecture,
    ( member(esk3_2(X2,X1),universal_class)
    | X1 != esk1_0
    | X2 != esk1_0 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[13]) ).

cnf(16,negated_conjecture,
    ( member(esk2_2(X2,X1),universal_class)
    | X1 != esk1_0
    | X2 != esk1_0 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[13]) ).

cnf(17,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk1_0 != ordered_pair(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X2,universal_class)
    | ~ member(X1,universal_class) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[13]) ).

cnf(18,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ member(esk3_2(X1,X2),universal_class)
    | ~ member(esk2_2(X1,X2),universal_class)
    | esk1_0 != X1
    | esk1_0 != X2 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[17,14,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(24,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk1_0 != X1
    | esk1_0 != X2
    | ~ member(esk3_2(X1,X2),universal_class) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[18,16]) ).

cnf(25,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk1_0 != X1
    | esk1_0 != X2 ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[24,15]) ).

fof(26,plain,
    ( ~ epred1_0
  <=> ! [X1] : ~ equal(esk1_0,X1) ),
    introduced(definition),
    [split] ).

cnf(27,plain,
    ( epred1_0
    | esk1_0 != X1 ),
    inference(split_equiv,[status(thm)],[26]) ).

fof(28,plain,
    ( ~ epred2_0
  <=> ! [X2] : ~ equal(esk1_0,X2) ),
    introduced(definition),
    [split] ).

cnf(29,plain,
    ( epred2_0
    | esk1_0 != X2 ),
    inference(split_equiv,[status(thm)],[28]) ).

cnf(30,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ epred2_0
    | ~ epred1_0 ),
    inference(apply_def,[status(esa)],[inference(apply_def,[status(esa)],[25,26,theory(equality)]),28,theory(equality)]),
    [split] ).

cnf(31,negated_conjecture,
    epred1_0,
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[27,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(33,negated_conjecture,
    epred2_0,
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[29,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(37,negated_conjecture,
    ( $false
    | ~ epred1_0 ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[30,33,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(38,negated_conjecture,
    ( $false
    | $false ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[37,31,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(39,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[38,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(40,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    39,
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/SInE---0.4/Source/sine.py:10: DeprecationWarning: the sets module is deprecated
%   from sets import Set
% % SZS status Started for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/SET/SET108+1.p
% --creating new selector for [SET005+0.ax]
% -running prover on /tmp/tmpRU7xFi/sel_SET108+1.p_1 with time limit 29
% -running prover with command ['/davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SInE---0.4/Source/./Source/PROVER/eproof.working', '-s', '-tLPO4', '-xAuto', '-tAuto', '--memory-limit=768', '--tptp3-format', '--cpu-limit=29', '/tmp/tmpRU7xFi/sel_SET108+1.p_1']
% -prover status Theorem
% Problem SET108+1.p solved in phase 0.
% % SZS status Theorem for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/SET/SET108+1.p
% % SZS status Ended for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/SET/SET108+1.p
% Solved 1 out of 1.
% # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% # SZS status Theorem
% # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% See solution above
% # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------