TSTP Solution File: SET103-7 by iProver---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9
% Problem : SET103-7 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 3 02:59:55 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 10.25s 2.14s
% Output : CNFRefutation 10.25s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 11 ( 10 unt; 1 nHn; 6 RR)
% Number of literals : 12 ( 8 equ; 4 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 7 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_65,plain,
unordered_pair(X0,X1) = unordered_pair(X1,X0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commutativity_of_unordered_pair) ).
cnf(c_83,plain,
( singleton(X0) = null_class
| member(X0,universal_class) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',singleton_is_null_class) ).
cnf(c_105,negated_conjecture,
unordered_pair(singleton(x),unordered_pair(x,null_class)) != ordered_pair(x,y),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_property_1_of_ordered_pair_1) ).
cnf(c_106,negated_conjecture,
~ member(y,universal_class),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_property_1_of_ordered_pair_2) ).
cnf(c_119,plain,
unordered_pair(singleton(X0),unordered_pair(X0,singleton(X1))) = ordered_pair(X0,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',ordered_pair) ).
cnf(c_1595,plain,
unordered_pair(singleton(x),unordered_pair(null_class,x)) != ordered_pair(x,y),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_105,c_65]) ).
cnf(c_4187,negated_conjecture,
~ member(y,universal_class),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_106]) ).
cnf(c_6619,plain,
singleton(y) = null_class,
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_83,c_4187]) ).
cnf(c_10554,plain,
unordered_pair(singleton(X0),unordered_pair(X0,null_class)) = ordered_pair(X0,y),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_6619,c_119]) ).
cnf(c_10842,plain,
unordered_pair(singleton(X0),unordered_pair(null_class,X0)) = ordered_pair(X0,y),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_65,c_10554]) ).
cnf(c_10861,plain,
$false,
inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1595,c_10842]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11 % Problem : SET103-7 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.11/0.12 % Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.11/0.32 % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32 % DateTime : Thu May 2 20:35:04 EDT 2024
% 0.11/0.32 % CPUTime :
% 0.17/0.44 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.17/0.44 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --heuristic_context casc_unsat --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 10.25/2.14 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 10.25/2.14 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 10.25/2.14
% 10.25/2.14 %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 10.25/2.14
% 10.25/2.14 ------ iProver source info
% 10.25/2.14
% 10.25/2.14 git: date: 2024-05-02 19:28:25 +0000
% 10.25/2.14 git: sha1: a33b5eb135c74074ba803943bb12f2ebd971352f
% 10.25/2.14 git: non_committed_changes: false
% 10.25/2.14
% 10.25/2.14 ------ Parsing...successful
% 10.25/2.14
% 10.25/2.14
% 10.25/2.14
% 10.25/2.14 ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 3 sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e pe_s pe:1:0s pe:2:0s pe_e sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 2 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e
% 10.25/2.14
% 10.25/2.14 ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e
% 10.25/2.14
% 10.25/2.14 ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 10.25/2.14 ------ Proving...
% 10.25/2.14 ------ Problem Properties
% 10.25/2.14
% 10.25/2.14
% 10.25/2.14 clauses 139
% 10.25/2.14 conjectures 1
% 10.25/2.14 EPR 18
% 10.25/2.14 Horn 115
% 10.25/2.14 unary 47
% 10.25/2.14 binary 56
% 10.25/2.14 lits 274
% 10.25/2.14 lits eq 84
% 10.25/2.14 fd_pure 0
% 10.25/2.14 fd_pseudo 0
% 10.25/2.14 fd_cond 5
% 10.25/2.14 fd_pseudo_cond 14
% 10.25/2.14 AC symbols 0
% 10.25/2.14
% 10.25/2.14 ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on
% 10.25/2.14
% 10.25/2.14 ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 10.25/2.14
% 10.25/2.14
% 10.25/2.14 ------
% 10.25/2.14 Current options:
% 10.25/2.14 ------
% 10.25/2.14
% 10.25/2.14
% 10.25/2.14
% 10.25/2.14
% 10.25/2.14 ------ Proving...
% 10.25/2.14
% 10.25/2.14
% 10.25/2.14 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 10.25/2.14
% 10.25/2.14 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 10.25/2.14
% 10.25/2.14
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------