TSTP Solution File: SET103-6 by Vampire-SAT---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire-SAT---4.8
% Problem : SET103-6 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 03:16:11 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.15s 0.40s
% Output : Refutation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 9
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 19 ( 10 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 32 ( 17 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 24 ( 11 ~; 13 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 21 ( 21 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f338,plain,
$false,
inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f333]) ).
fof(f333,plain,
ordered_pair(x,y) != ordered_pair(x,y),
inference(superposition,[],[f92,f292]) ).
fof(f292,plain,
! [X0] : ordered_pair(X0,y) = unordered_pair(singleton(X0),unordered_pair(X0,null_class)),
inference(superposition,[],[f13,f281]) ).
fof(f281,plain,
null_class = singleton(y),
inference(resolution,[],[f277,f127]) ).
fof(f127,plain,
! [X0] : ~ member(y,X0),
inference(resolution,[],[f122,f4]) ).
fof(f4,axiom,
! [X0] : subclass(X0,universal_class),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',class_elements_are_sets) ).
fof(f122,plain,
! [X0] :
( ~ subclass(X0,universal_class)
| ~ member(y,X0) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f1,f93]) ).
fof(f93,axiom,
~ member(y,universal_class),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_property_1_of_ordered_pair_2) ).
fof(f1,axiom,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( member(X2,X1)
| ~ member(X2,X0)
| ~ subclass(X0,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',subclass_members) ).
fof(f277,plain,
! [X0] :
( member(X0,singleton(X0))
| singleton(X0) = null_class ),
inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f276]) ).
fof(f276,plain,
! [X0] :
( member(X0,singleton(X0))
| singleton(X0) = null_class
| singleton(X0) = null_class ),
inference(superposition,[],[f66,f269]) ).
fof(f269,plain,
! [X0] :
( regular(singleton(X0)) = X0
| singleton(X0) = null_class ),
inference(resolution,[],[f265,f66]) ).
fof(f265,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ member(X1,singleton(X0))
| X0 = X1 ),
inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f264]) ).
fof(f264,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ member(X1,singleton(X0))
| X0 = X1
| X0 = X1 ),
inference(superposition,[],[f8,f12]) ).
fof(f12,axiom,
! [X0] : unordered_pair(X0,X0) = singleton(X0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',singleton_set) ).
fof(f8,axiom,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( ~ member(X2,unordered_pair(X0,X1))
| X0 = X2
| X1 = X2 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',unordered_pair_member) ).
fof(f66,axiom,
! [X0] :
( member(regular(X0),X0)
| null_class = X0 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',regularity1) ).
fof(f13,axiom,
! [X0,X1] : unordered_pair(singleton(X0),unordered_pair(X0,singleton(X1))) = ordered_pair(X0,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ordered_pair) ).
fof(f92,axiom,
unordered_pair(singleton(x),unordered_pair(x,null_class)) != ordered_pair(x,y),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_property_1_of_ordered_pair_1) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.12 % Problem : SET103-6 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.08/0.14 % Command : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.35 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35 % DateTime : Mon May 20 11:49:53 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.36 % (11738)Running in auto input_syntax mode. Trying TPTP
% 0.15/0.38 % (11741)WARNING: value z3 for option sas not known
% 0.15/0.38 % (11739)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbas=function:fmbsr=1.2:fde=unused:nm=0_846 on theBenchmark for (846ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.38 % (11740)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbdsb=on:fmbes=contour:fmbswr=3:fde=none:nm=0_793 on theBenchmark for (793ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.38 % (11742)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbsr=1.5:nm=32_533 on theBenchmark for (533ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.38 % (11743)ott+10_10:1_add=off:afr=on:amm=off:anc=all:bd=off:bs=on:fsr=off:irw=on:lma=on:msp=off:nm=4:nwc=4.0:sac=on:sp=reverse_frequency_531 on theBenchmark for (531ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.38 % (11744)ott-10_8_av=off:bd=preordered:bs=on:fsd=off:fsr=off:fde=unused:irw=on:lcm=predicate:lma=on:nm=4:nwc=1.7:sp=frequency_522 on theBenchmark for (522ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.38 % (11745)ott+1_64_av=off:bd=off:bce=on:fsd=off:fde=unused:gsp=on:irw=on:lcm=predicate:lma=on:nm=2:nwc=1.1:sims=off:urr=on_497 on theBenchmark for (497ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.38 % (11741)dis+2_11_add=large:afr=on:amm=off:bd=off:bce=on:fsd=off:fde=none:gs=on:gsaa=full_model:gsem=off:irw=on:msp=off:nm=4:nwc=1.3:sas=z3:sims=off:sac=on:sp=reverse_arity_569 on theBenchmark for (569ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.39 % (11744)First to succeed.
% 0.15/0.39 % (11744)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-11738"
% 0.15/0.40 % (11744)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.15/0.40 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.15/0.40 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.40 % (11744)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.40 % (11744)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.15/0.40 % (11744)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.15/0.40
% 0.15/0.40 % (11744)Memory used [KB]: 1130
% 0.15/0.40 % (11744)Time elapsed: 0.016 s
% 0.15/0.40 % (11744)Instructions burned: 22 (million)
% 0.15/0.40 % (11738)Success in time 0.025 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------