TSTP Solution File: SET101-7 by Metis---2.4

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Metis---2.4
% Problem  : SET101-7 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : metis --show proof --show saturation %s

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 03:32:39 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.80s 0.99s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.80s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   21 (  14 unt;   0 nHn;  10 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   31 (  15 equ;  11 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   35 (   5 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(ordered_pair,axiom,
    unordered_pair(singleton(X),unordered_pair(X,singleton(Y))) = ordered_pair(X,Y) ).

cnf(commutativity_of_unordered_pair,axiom,
    unordered_pair(X,Y) = unordered_pair(Y,X) ).

cnf(corollary_1_to_singletons_are_sets,axiom,
    member(singleton(Y),unordered_pair(X,singleton(Y))) ).

cnf(prove_singleton_member_of_ordered_pair_1,negated_conjecture,
    ~ member(singleton(x),ordered_pair(x,y)) ).

cnf(refute_0_0,plain,
    member(singleton(X_41),unordered_pair(X_40,singleton(X_41))),
    inference(subst,[],[corollary_1_to_singletons_are_sets:[bind(X,$fot(X_40)),bind(Y,$fot(X_41))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_1,plain,
    unordered_pair(singleton(X_41),X_40) = unordered_pair(X_40,singleton(X_41)),
    inference(subst,[],[commutativity_of_unordered_pair:[bind(X,$fot(singleton(X_41))),bind(Y,$fot(X_40))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_2,plain,
    X0 = X0,
    introduced(tautology,[refl,[$fot(X0)]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_3,plain,
    ( X0 != X0
    | X0 != Y0
    | Y0 = X0 ),
    introduced(tautology,[equality,[$cnf( $equal(X0,X0) ),[0],$fot(Y0)]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_4,plain,
    ( X0 != Y0
    | Y0 = X0 ),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(X0,X0) )],[refute_0_2,refute_0_3]) ).

cnf(refute_0_5,plain,
    ( unordered_pair(singleton(X_41),X_40) != unordered_pair(X_40,singleton(X_41))
    | unordered_pair(X_40,singleton(X_41)) = unordered_pair(singleton(X_41),X_40) ),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_4:[bind(X0,$fot(unordered_pair(singleton(X_41),X_40))),bind(Y0,$fot(unordered_pair(X_40,singleton(X_41))))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_6,plain,
    unordered_pair(X_40,singleton(X_41)) = unordered_pair(singleton(X_41),X_40),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(unordered_pair(singleton(X_41),X_40),unordered_pair(X_40,singleton(X_41))) )],[refute_0_1,refute_0_5]) ).

cnf(refute_0_7,plain,
    ( unordered_pair(X_40,singleton(X_41)) != unordered_pair(singleton(X_41),X_40)
    | ~ member(singleton(X_41),unordered_pair(X_40,singleton(X_41)))
    | member(singleton(X_41),unordered_pair(singleton(X_41),X_40)) ),
    introduced(tautology,[equality,[$cnf( member(singleton(X_41),unordered_pair(X_40,singleton(X_41))) ),[1],$fot(unordered_pair(singleton(X_41),X_40))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_8,plain,
    ( ~ member(singleton(X_41),unordered_pair(X_40,singleton(X_41)))
    | member(singleton(X_41),unordered_pair(singleton(X_41),X_40)) ),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(unordered_pair(X_40,singleton(X_41)),unordered_pair(singleton(X_41),X_40)) )],[refute_0_6,refute_0_7]) ).

cnf(refute_0_9,plain,
    member(singleton(X_41),unordered_pair(singleton(X_41),X_40)),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( member(singleton(X_41),unordered_pair(X_40,singleton(X_41))) )],[refute_0_0,refute_0_8]) ).

cnf(refute_0_10,plain,
    member(singleton(X_41),unordered_pair(singleton(X_41),unordered_pair(X_41,singleton(X_163)))),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_9:[bind(X_40,$fot(unordered_pair(X_41,singleton(X_163))))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_11,plain,
    unordered_pair(singleton(X_41),unordered_pair(X_41,singleton(X_163))) = ordered_pair(X_41,X_163),
    inference(subst,[],[ordered_pair:[bind(X,$fot(X_41)),bind(Y,$fot(X_163))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_12,plain,
    ( unordered_pair(singleton(X_41),unordered_pair(X_41,singleton(X_163))) != ordered_pair(X_41,X_163)
    | ~ member(singleton(X_41),unordered_pair(singleton(X_41),unordered_pair(X_41,singleton(X_163))))
    | member(singleton(X_41),ordered_pair(X_41,X_163)) ),
    introduced(tautology,[equality,[$cnf( member(singleton(X_41),unordered_pair(singleton(X_41),unordered_pair(X_41,singleton(X_163)))) ),[1],$fot(ordered_pair(X_41,X_163))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_13,plain,
    ( ~ member(singleton(X_41),unordered_pair(singleton(X_41),unordered_pair(X_41,singleton(X_163))))
    | member(singleton(X_41),ordered_pair(X_41,X_163)) ),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(unordered_pair(singleton(X_41),unordered_pair(X_41,singleton(X_163))),ordered_pair(X_41,X_163)) )],[refute_0_11,refute_0_12]) ).

cnf(refute_0_14,plain,
    member(singleton(X_41),ordered_pair(X_41,X_163)),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( member(singleton(X_41),unordered_pair(singleton(X_41),unordered_pair(X_41,singleton(X_163)))) )],[refute_0_10,refute_0_13]) ).

cnf(refute_0_15,plain,
    member(singleton(x),ordered_pair(x,y)),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_14:[bind(X_163,$fot(y)),bind(X_41,$fot(x))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_16,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( member(singleton(x),ordered_pair(x,y)) )],[refute_0_15,prove_singleton_member_of_ordered_pair_1]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : SET101-7 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : metis --show proof --show saturation %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Sat Jul  9 17:07:56 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.34  %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
% 0.80/0.99  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.80/0.99  
% 0.80/0.99  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 0.80/0.99  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------