TSTP Solution File: SET093+1 by Z3---4.8.9.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Z3---4.8.9.0
% Problem  : SET093+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : z3_tptp -proof -model -t:%d -file:%s

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 20 05:05:34 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.19s 0.40s
% Output   : Proof 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : SET093+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : z3_tptp -proof -model -t:%d -file:%s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Sat Sep  3 02:19:59 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.34  Z3tptp [4.8.9.0] (c) 2006-20**. Microsoft Corp.
% 0.12/0.34  Usage: tptp [options] [-file:]file
% 0.12/0.34    -h, -?       prints this message.
% 0.12/0.34    -smt2        print SMT-LIB2 benchmark.
% 0.12/0.34    -m, -model   generate model.
% 0.12/0.34    -p, -proof   generate proof.
% 0.12/0.34    -c, -core    generate unsat core of named formulas.
% 0.12/0.34    -st, -statistics display statistics.
% 0.12/0.34    -t:timeout   set timeout (in second).
% 0.12/0.34    -smt2status  display status in smt2 format instead of SZS.
% 0.12/0.34    -check_status check the status produced by Z3 against annotation in benchmark.
% 0.12/0.34    -<param>:<value> configuration parameter and value.
% 0.12/0.34    -o:<output-file> file to place output in.
% 0.19/0.40  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/0.40  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.19/0.40  tff(member_type, type, (
% 0.19/0.40     member: ( $i * $i ) > $o)).
% 0.19/0.40  tff(universal_class_type, type, (
% 0.19/0.40     universal_class: $i)).
% 0.19/0.40  tff(unordered_pair_type, type, (
% 0.19/0.40     unordered_pair: ( $i * $i ) > $i)).
% 0.19/0.40  tff(member_of_type, type, (
% 0.19/0.40     member_of: $i > $i)).
% 0.19/0.40  tff(tptp_fun_X_7_type, type, (
% 0.19/0.40     tptp_fun_X_7: $i)).
% 0.19/0.40  tff(singleton_type, type, (
% 0.19/0.40     singleton: $i > $i)).
% 0.19/0.40  tff(1,plain,
% 0.19/0.40      ((~![X: $i] : ((~(singleton(member_of(X)) = X)) | member(X, universal_class))) <=> (~![X: $i] : ((~(singleton(member_of(X)) = X)) | member(X, universal_class)))),
% 0.19/0.40      inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.19/0.40  tff(2,plain,
% 0.19/0.40      ((~![X: $i] : ((singleton(member_of(X)) = X) => member(X, universal_class))) <=> (~![X: $i] : ((~(singleton(member_of(X)) = X)) | member(X, universal_class)))),
% 0.19/0.40      inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.19/0.40  tff(3,axiom,(~![X: $i] : ((singleton(member_of(X)) = X) => member(X, universal_class))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','corollary_2_to_singletons_are_sets')).
% 0.19/0.40  tff(4,plain,
% 0.19/0.40      (~![X: $i] : ((~(singleton(member_of(X)) = X)) | member(X, universal_class))),
% 0.19/0.40      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[3, 2])).
% 0.19/0.40  tff(5,plain,
% 0.19/0.40      (~![X: $i] : ((~(singleton(member_of(X)) = X)) | member(X, universal_class))),
% 0.19/0.40      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[4, 1])).
% 0.19/0.40  tff(6,plain,
% 0.19/0.40      (~![X: $i] : ((~(singleton(member_of(X)) = X)) | member(X, universal_class))),
% 0.19/0.40      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[5, 1])).
% 0.19/0.40  tff(7,plain,
% 0.19/0.40      (~![X: $i] : ((~(singleton(member_of(X)) = X)) | member(X, universal_class))),
% 0.19/0.40      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[6, 1])).
% 0.19/0.40  tff(8,plain,
% 0.19/0.40      (~![X: $i] : ((~(singleton(member_of(X)) = X)) | member(X, universal_class))),
% 0.19/0.40      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[7, 1])).
% 0.19/0.40  tff(9,plain,
% 0.19/0.40      (~![X: $i] : ((~(singleton(member_of(X)) = X)) | member(X, universal_class))),
% 0.19/0.40      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[8, 1])).
% 0.19/0.40  tff(10,plain,
% 0.19/0.40      (~![X: $i] : ((~(singleton(member_of(X)) = X)) | member(X, universal_class))),
% 0.19/0.40      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[9, 1])).
% 0.19/0.40  tff(11,plain,(
% 0.19/0.40      ~((~(singleton(member_of(X!7)) = X!7)) | member(X!7, universal_class))),
% 0.19/0.40      inference(skolemize,[status(sab)],[10])).
% 0.19/0.40  tff(12,plain,
% 0.19/0.40      (singleton(member_of(X!7)) = X!7),
% 0.19/0.40      inference(or_elim,[status(thm)],[11])).
% 0.19/0.40  tff(13,plain,
% 0.19/0.40      (^[X: $i] : refl((singleton(X) = unordered_pair(X, X)) <=> (singleton(X) = unordered_pair(X, X)))),
% 0.19/0.40      inference(bind,[status(th)],[])).
% 0.19/0.40  tff(14,plain,
% 0.19/0.40      (![X: $i] : (singleton(X) = unordered_pair(X, X)) <=> ![X: $i] : (singleton(X) = unordered_pair(X, X))),
% 0.19/0.40      inference(quant_intro,[status(thm)],[13])).
% 0.19/0.40  tff(15,plain,
% 0.19/0.40      (![X: $i] : (singleton(X) = unordered_pair(X, X)) <=> ![X: $i] : (singleton(X) = unordered_pair(X, X))),
% 0.19/0.40      inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.19/0.40  tff(16,axiom,(![X: $i] : (singleton(X) = unordered_pair(X, X))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET005+0.ax','singleton_set_defn')).
% 0.19/0.40  tff(17,plain,
% 0.19/0.40      (![X: $i] : (singleton(X) = unordered_pair(X, X))),
% 0.19/0.40      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[16, 15])).
% 0.19/0.40  tff(18,plain,(
% 0.19/0.40      ![X: $i] : (singleton(X) = unordered_pair(X, X))),
% 0.19/0.40      inference(skolemize,[status(sab)],[17])).
% 0.19/0.40  tff(19,plain,
% 0.19/0.40      (![X: $i] : (singleton(X) = unordered_pair(X, X))),
% 0.19/0.40      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[18, 14])).
% 0.19/0.40  tff(20,plain,
% 0.19/0.40      ((~![X: $i] : (singleton(X) = unordered_pair(X, X))) | (singleton(member_of(X!7)) = unordered_pair(member_of(X!7), member_of(X!7)))),
% 0.19/0.40      inference(quant_inst,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.19/0.40  tff(21,plain,
% 0.19/0.40      (singleton(member_of(X!7)) = unordered_pair(member_of(X!7), member_of(X!7))),
% 0.19/0.40      inference(unit_resolution,[status(thm)],[20, 19])).
% 0.19/0.40  tff(22,plain,
% 0.19/0.40      (unordered_pair(member_of(X!7), member_of(X!7)) = singleton(member_of(X!7))),
% 0.19/0.40      inference(symmetry,[status(thm)],[21])).
% 0.19/0.40  tff(23,plain,
% 0.19/0.40      (unordered_pair(member_of(X!7), member_of(X!7)) = X!7),
% 0.19/0.40      inference(transitivity,[status(thm)],[22, 12])).
% 0.19/0.40  tff(24,plain,
% 0.19/0.40      (member(unordered_pair(member_of(X!7), member_of(X!7)), universal_class) <=> member(X!7, universal_class)),
% 0.19/0.40      inference(monotonicity,[status(thm)],[23])).
% 0.19/0.40  tff(25,plain,
% 0.19/0.41      (member(X!7, universal_class) <=> member(unordered_pair(member_of(X!7), member_of(X!7)), universal_class)),
% 0.19/0.41      inference(symmetry,[status(thm)],[24])).
% 0.19/0.41  tff(26,plain,
% 0.19/0.41      ((~member(X!7, universal_class)) <=> (~member(unordered_pair(member_of(X!7), member_of(X!7)), universal_class))),
% 0.19/0.41      inference(monotonicity,[status(thm)],[25])).
% 0.19/0.41  tff(27,plain,
% 0.19/0.41      (~member(X!7, universal_class)),
% 0.19/0.41      inference(or_elim,[status(thm)],[11])).
% 0.19/0.41  tff(28,plain,
% 0.19/0.41      (~member(unordered_pair(member_of(X!7), member_of(X!7)), universal_class)),
% 0.19/0.41      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[27, 26])).
% 0.19/0.41  tff(29,plain,
% 0.19/0.41      (^[X: $i, Y: $i] : refl(member(unordered_pair(X, Y), universal_class) <=> member(unordered_pair(X, Y), universal_class))),
% 0.19/0.41      inference(bind,[status(th)],[])).
% 0.19/0.41  tff(30,plain,
% 0.19/0.41      (![X: $i, Y: $i] : member(unordered_pair(X, Y), universal_class) <=> ![X: $i, Y: $i] : member(unordered_pair(X, Y), universal_class)),
% 0.19/0.41      inference(quant_intro,[status(thm)],[29])).
% 0.19/0.41  tff(31,plain,
% 0.19/0.41      (![X: $i, Y: $i] : member(unordered_pair(X, Y), universal_class) <=> ![X: $i, Y: $i] : member(unordered_pair(X, Y), universal_class)),
% 0.19/0.41      inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.19/0.41  tff(32,axiom,(![X: $i, Y: $i] : member(unordered_pair(X, Y), universal_class)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET005+0.ax','unordered_pair')).
% 0.19/0.41  tff(33,plain,
% 0.19/0.41      (![X: $i, Y: $i] : member(unordered_pair(X, Y), universal_class)),
% 0.19/0.41      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[32, 31])).
% 0.19/0.41  tff(34,plain,(
% 0.19/0.41      ![X: $i, Y: $i] : member(unordered_pair(X, Y), universal_class)),
% 0.19/0.41      inference(skolemize,[status(sab)],[33])).
% 0.19/0.41  tff(35,plain,
% 0.19/0.41      (![X: $i, Y: $i] : member(unordered_pair(X, Y), universal_class)),
% 0.19/0.41      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[34, 30])).
% 0.19/0.41  tff(36,plain,
% 0.19/0.41      ((~![X: $i, Y: $i] : member(unordered_pair(X, Y), universal_class)) | member(unordered_pair(member_of(X!7), member_of(X!7)), universal_class)),
% 0.19/0.41      inference(quant_inst,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.19/0.41  tff(37,plain,
% 0.19/0.41      (member(unordered_pair(member_of(X!7), member_of(X!7)), universal_class)),
% 0.19/0.41      inference(unit_resolution,[status(thm)],[36, 35])).
% 0.19/0.41  tff(38,plain,
% 0.19/0.41      ($false),
% 0.19/0.41      inference(unit_resolution,[status(thm)],[37, 28])).
% 0.19/0.41  % SZS output end Proof
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------