TSTP Solution File: SET093+1 by SInE---0.4

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SInE---0.4
% Problem  : SET093+1 : TPTP v7.3.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sine.py -e eprover -t %d %s

% Computer : n187.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 2.40GHz
% Memory   : 32218.5MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-862.11.6.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Feb 27 14:40:15 EST 2019

% Result   : Theorem 185.49s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 185.49s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   17 (  12 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   22 (   3 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   10 (   5   ~;   0   |;   3   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   13 (   2 sgn   8   !;   2   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(3,axiom,
    ! [X2] : equal(singleton(X2),unordered_pair(X2,X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmpG72THC/sel_theBenchmark.p_4',singleton_set_defn) ).

fof(5,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3] : member(unordered_pair(X2,X3),universal_class),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmpG72THC/sel_theBenchmark.p_4',unordered_pair) ).

fof(9,conjecture,
    ! [X2] :
      ( equal(singleton(member_of(X2)),X2)
     => member(X2,universal_class) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmpG72THC/sel_theBenchmark.p_4',corollary_2_to_singletons_are_sets) ).

fof(11,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X2] :
        ( equal(singleton(member_of(X2)),X2)
       => member(X2,universal_class) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[9]) ).

fof(21,plain,
    ! [X3] : equal(singleton(X3),unordered_pair(X3,X3)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

cnf(22,plain,
    singleton(X1) = unordered_pair(X1,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[21]) ).

fof(29,plain,
    ! [X4,X5] : member(unordered_pair(X4,X5),universal_class),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

cnf(30,plain,
    member(unordered_pair(X1,X2),universal_class),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[29]) ).

fof(39,negated_conjecture,
    ? [X2] :
      ( equal(singleton(member_of(X2)),X2)
      & ~ member(X2,universal_class) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[11]) ).

fof(40,negated_conjecture,
    ? [X3] :
      ( equal(singleton(member_of(X3)),X3)
      & ~ member(X3,universal_class) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[39]) ).

fof(41,negated_conjecture,
    ( equal(singleton(member_of(esk1_0)),esk1_0)
    & ~ member(esk1_0,universal_class) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[40]) ).

cnf(42,negated_conjecture,
    ~ member(esk1_0,universal_class),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[41]) ).

cnf(43,negated_conjecture,
    singleton(member_of(esk1_0)) = esk1_0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[41]) ).

cnf(46,negated_conjecture,
    unordered_pair(member_of(esk1_0),member_of(esk1_0)) = esk1_0,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[43,22,theory(equality)]),
    [unfolding] ).

cnf(54,negated_conjecture,
    member(esk1_0,universal_class),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[30,46,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(55,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[54,42,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(56,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    55,
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.04  % Problem  : SET093+1 : TPTP v7.3.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.00/0.06  % Command  : sine.py -e eprover -t %d %s
% 0.03/0.24  % Computer : n187.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% 0.03/0.24  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.03/0.24  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 @ 2.40GHz
% 0.03/0.24  % Memory   : 32218.5MB
% 0.03/0.24  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-862.11.6.el7.x86_64
% 0.03/0.24  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.03/0.24  % DateTime : Sun Feb 24 10:06:44 CST 2019
% 0.03/0.25  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.03/0.29  % SZS status Started for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.03/0.29  --creating new selector for [SET005+0.ax]
% 29.12/29.37  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 110.19/110.92  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 110.31/111.08  -running prover on /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmpG72THC/sel_theBenchmark.p_1 with time limit 29
% 110.31/111.08  -running prover with command ['/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/Source/./Source/PROVER/eproof.working', '-s', '-tLPO4', '-xAuto', '-tAuto', '--memory-limit=768', '--tptp3-format', '--cpu-limit=29', '/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmpG72THC/sel_theBenchmark.p_1']
% 110.31/111.08  -prover status ResourceOut
% 110.31/111.08  -running prover on /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmpG72THC/sel_theBenchmark.p_2 with time limit 81
% 110.31/111.08  -running prover with command ['/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/Source/./Source/PROVER/eproof.working', '-s', '-tLPO4', '-xAuto', '-tAuto', '--memory-limit=768', '--tptp3-format', '--cpu-limit=81', '/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmpG72THC/sel_theBenchmark.p_2']
% 110.31/111.08  -prover status ResourceOut
% 110.31/111.08  --creating new selector for [SET005+0.ax]
% 185.34/186.28  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 185.44/186.47  -running prover on /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmpG72THC/sel_theBenchmark.p_3 with time limit 75
% 185.44/186.47  -running prover with command ['/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/Source/./Source/PROVER/eproof.working', '-s', '-tLPO4', '-xAuto', '-tAuto', '--memory-limit=768', '--tptp3-format', '--cpu-limit=75', '/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmpG72THC/sel_theBenchmark.p_3']
% 185.44/186.47  -prover status ResourceOut
% 185.44/186.47  --creating new selector for [SET005+0.ax]
% 185.49/186.56  -running prover on /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmpG72THC/sel_theBenchmark.p_4 with time limit 56
% 185.49/186.56  -running prover with command ['/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/Source/./Source/PROVER/eproof.working', '-s', '-tLPO4', '-xAuto', '-tAuto', '--memory-limit=768', '--tptp3-format', '--cpu-limit=56', '/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmpG72THC/sel_theBenchmark.p_4']
% 185.49/186.56  -prover status Theorem
% 185.49/186.56  Problem theBenchmark.p solved in phase 3.
% 185.49/186.56  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 185.49/186.56  % SZS status Ended for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 185.49/186.57  Solved 1 out of 1.
% 185.49/186.57  # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% 185.49/186.57  # SZS status Theorem
% 185.49/186.57  # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% See solution above
% 185.49/186.57  # SZS output end CNFRefutation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------