TSTP Solution File: SET093+1 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : SET093+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:22:04 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.15s 0.43s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 13 ( 10 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 16 ( 8 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 6 ( 3 ~; 0 |; 1 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 11 ( 2 sgn; 8 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(corollary_2_to_singletons_are_sets,conjecture,
! [X1] :
( singleton(member_of(X1)) = X1
=> member(X1,universal_class) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.P6vY4ddgXp/E---3.1_31069.p',corollary_2_to_singletons_are_sets) ).
fof(singleton_set_defn,axiom,
! [X1] : singleton(X1) = unordered_pair(X1,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.P6vY4ddgXp/E---3.1_31069.p',singleton_set_defn) ).
fof(unordered_pair,axiom,
! [X1,X2] : member(unordered_pair(X1,X2),universal_class),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.P6vY4ddgXp/E---3.1_31069.p',unordered_pair) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1] :
( singleton(member_of(X1)) = X1
=> member(X1,universal_class) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[corollary_2_to_singletons_are_sets]) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
( singleton(member_of(esk8_0)) = esk8_0
& ~ member(esk8_0,universal_class) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])]) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X24] : singleton(X24) = unordered_pair(X24,X24),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[singleton_set_defn]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X22,X23] : member(unordered_pair(X22,X23),universal_class),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[unordered_pair]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
singleton(member_of(esk8_0)) = esk8_0,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
singleton(X1) = unordered_pair(X1,X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
member(unordered_pair(X1,X2),universal_class),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
unordered_pair(member_of(esk8_0),member_of(esk8_0)) = esk8_0,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
~ member(esk8_0,universal_class),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.09/0.10 % Problem : SET093+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.09/0.11 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.10/0.31 % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.31 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.31 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.31 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.31 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.31 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.10/0.31 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.31 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 16:30:39 EDT 2023
% 0.10/0.31 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.42 Running first-order model finding
% 0.15/0.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.P6vY4ddgXp/E---3.1_31069.p
% 0.15/0.43 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.15/0.43 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.43 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.43 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.43 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43 # G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with pid 31146 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S
% 0.15/0.43 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.43 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.43 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.43 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.15/0.43 # Search class: FGHSM-FFMM21-DFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.43 # partial match(1): FGHSM-FFMM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.43 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.15/0.43 # Starting G-E--_200_B02_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S0S with 811s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 151s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43 # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43 # Starting G-E--_208_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43 # G-E--_200_B02_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S0S with pid 31157 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Result found by G-E--_200_B02_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S0S
% 0.15/0.43 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.43 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.43 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.43 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.15/0.43 # Search class: FGHSM-FFMM21-DFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.43 # partial match(1): FGHSM-FFMM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.43 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.15/0.43 # Starting G-E--_200_B02_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S0S with 811s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43 # Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.15/0.43
% 0.15/0.43 # Proof found!
% 0.15/0.43 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.15/0.43 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.43 # Parsed axioms : 48
% 0.15/0.43 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Initial clauses : 95
% 0.15/0.43 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 8
% 0.15/0.43 # Initial clauses in saturation : 87
% 0.15/0.43 # Processed clauses : 10
% 0.15/0.43 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # ...remaining for further processing : 10
% 0.15/0.43 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 2
% 0.15/0.43 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Generated clauses : 3
% 0.15/0.43 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 2
% 0.15/0.43 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Paramodulations : 1
% 0.15/0.43 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # NegExts : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Equation resolutions : 2
% 0.15/0.43 # Total rewrite steps : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43 # Current number of processed clauses : 8
% 0.15/0.43 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 6
% 0.15/0.43 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.15/0.43 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 79
% 0.15/0.43 # ...number of literals in the above : 177
% 0.15/0.43 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Current number of archived clauses : 8
% 0.15/0.43 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Termbank termtop insertions : 5098
% 0.15/0.43
% 0.15/0.43 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.43 # User time : 0.008 s
% 0.15/0.43 # System time : 0.001 s
% 0.15/0.43 # Total time : 0.009 s
% 0.15/0.43 # Maximum resident set size: 2048 pages
% 0.15/0.43
% 0.15/0.43 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.43 # User time : 0.018 s
% 0.15/0.43 # System time : 0.006 s
% 0.15/0.43 # Total time : 0.024 s
% 0.15/0.43 # Maximum resident set size: 1732 pages
% 0.15/0.43 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------