TSTP Solution File: SET086+1 by SuperZenon---0.0.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SuperZenon---0.0.1
% Problem  : SET086+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_super_zenon -p0 -itptp -om -max-time %d %s

% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 05:39:13 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 1.68s 1.94s
% Output   : Proof 1.68s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem  : SET086+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% 0.06/0.13  % Command  : run_super_zenon -p0 -itptp -om -max-time %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Sun Jul 10 10:49:07 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 1.68/1.94  % SZS status Theorem
% 1.68/1.94  (* PROOF-FOUND *)
% 1.68/1.94  (* BEGIN-PROOF *)
% 1.68/1.94  % SZS output start Proof
% 1.68/1.94  1. ((member T_0 (universal_class)) /\ (T_1 = (singleton T_0))) (-. ((member T_0 (universal_class)) /\ (T_1 = (singleton T_0))))   ### Axiom
% 1.68/1.94  2. (-. (((member T_0 (universal_class)) /\ (T_1 = (singleton T_0))) \/ ((-. (Ex Y, ((member Y (universal_class)) /\ (T_1 = (singleton Y))))) /\ (T_0 = T_1)))) ((member T_0 (universal_class)) /\ (T_1 = (singleton T_0)))   ### NotOr 1
% 1.68/1.94  3. (-. (Ex U, (((member U (universal_class)) /\ (T_1 = (singleton U))) \/ ((-. (Ex Y, ((member Y (universal_class)) /\ (T_1 = (singleton Y))))) /\ (U = T_1))))) ((member T_0 (universal_class)) /\ (T_1 = (singleton T_0)))   ### NotExists 2
% 1.68/1.94  4. (Ex Y, ((member Y (universal_class)) /\ (T_1 = (singleton Y)))) (-. (Ex U, (((member U (universal_class)) /\ (T_1 = (singleton U))) \/ ((-. (Ex Y, ((member Y (universal_class)) /\ (T_1 = (singleton Y))))) /\ (U = T_1)))))   ### Exists 3
% 1.68/1.94  5. (-. (-. (Ex Y, ((member Y (universal_class)) /\ (T_1 = (singleton Y)))))) (-. (Ex U, (((member U (universal_class)) /\ (T_1 = (singleton U))) \/ ((-. (Ex Y, ((member Y (universal_class)) /\ (T_1 = (singleton Y))))) /\ (U = T_1)))))   ### NotNot 4
% 1.68/1.94  6. (T_1 != T_1)   ### Refl(=)
% 1.68/1.94  7. (-. ((-. (Ex Y, ((member Y (universal_class)) /\ (T_1 = (singleton Y))))) /\ (T_1 = T_1))) (-. (Ex U, (((member U (universal_class)) /\ (T_1 = (singleton U))) \/ ((-. (Ex Y, ((member Y (universal_class)) /\ (T_1 = (singleton Y))))) /\ (U = T_1)))))   ### NotAnd 5 6
% 1.68/1.94  8. (-. (((member T_1 (universal_class)) /\ (T_1 = (singleton T_1))) \/ ((-. (Ex Y, ((member Y (universal_class)) /\ (T_1 = (singleton Y))))) /\ (T_1 = T_1)))) (-. (Ex U, (((member U (universal_class)) /\ (T_1 = (singleton U))) \/ ((-. (Ex Y, ((member Y (universal_class)) /\ (T_1 = (singleton Y))))) /\ (U = T_1)))))   ### NotOr 7
% 1.68/1.94  9. (-. (Ex U, (((member U (universal_class)) /\ (T_1 = (singleton U))) \/ ((-. (Ex Y, ((member Y (universal_class)) /\ (T_1 = (singleton Y))))) /\ (U = T_1)))))   ### NotExists 8
% 1.68/1.94  10. (-. (All X, (Ex U, (((member U (universal_class)) /\ (X = (singleton U))) \/ ((-. (Ex Y, ((member Y (universal_class)) /\ (X = (singleton Y))))) /\ (U = X))))))   ### NotAllEx 9
% 1.68/1.94  % SZS output end Proof
% 1.68/1.94  (* END-PROOF *)
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------