TSTP Solution File: SET086+1 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : SET086+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 00:09:15 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 7.42s 2.35s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 7.42s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    8 (   2 unt;   0 nHn;   8 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   14 (   9 equ;   9 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    7 (   1 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_54,negated_conjecture,
    ( unordered_pair(X1,X1) != esk5_0
    | ~ member(X1,universal_class) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jnixg8bu/input.p',i_0_54) ).

cnf(i_0_53,negated_conjecture,
    ( member(esk6_1(X1),universal_class)
    | X1 != esk5_0 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jnixg8bu/input.p',i_0_53) ).

cnf(i_0_52,negated_conjecture,
    ( unordered_pair(esk6_1(X1),esk6_1(X1)) = esk5_0
    | X1 != esk5_0 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jnixg8bu/input.p',i_0_52) ).

cnf(c_0_58,negated_conjecture,
    ( unordered_pair(X1,X1) != esk5_0
    | ~ member(X1,universal_class) ),
    i_0_54 ).

cnf(c_0_59,negated_conjecture,
    ( member(esk6_1(X1),universal_class)
    | X1 != esk5_0 ),
    i_0_53 ).

cnf(c_0_60,negated_conjecture,
    ( unordered_pair(esk6_1(X1),esk6_1(X1)) = esk5_0
    | X1 != esk5_0 ),
    i_0_52 ).

cnf(c_0_61,negated_conjecture,
    X1 != esk5_0,
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_58,c_0_59]),c_0_60]) ).

cnf(c_0_62,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_61]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12  % Problem  : SET086+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% 0.10/0.12  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Sun Jul 10 10:56:10 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.44  # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.18/0.45  # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.45  # Filter: axfilter_auto   0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   0.p
% 0.18/0.45  # Filter: axfilter_auto   1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   1.p
% 0.18/0.45  # Filter: axfilter_auto   2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   2.p
% 7.42/2.35  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN:
% 7.42/2.35  # Version: 2.1pre011
% 7.42/2.35  # Preprocessing time       : 0.010 s
% 7.42/2.35  
% 7.42/2.35  # Proof found!
% 7.42/2.35  # SZS status Theorem
% 7.42/2.35  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.42/2.35  # Proof object total steps             : 8
% 7.42/2.35  # Proof object clause steps            : 5
% 7.42/2.35  # Proof object formula steps           : 3
% 7.42/2.35  # Proof object conjectures             : 8
% 7.42/2.35  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 5
% 7.42/2.35  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 7.42/2.35  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 3
% 7.42/2.35  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 3
% 7.42/2.35  # Proof object generating inferences   : 2
% 7.42/2.35  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 1
% 7.42/2.35  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.42/2.35  # Parsed axioms                        : 84
% 7.42/2.35  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 7.42/2.35  # Initial clauses                      : 84
% 7.42/2.35  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 7.42/2.35  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 84
% 7.42/2.35  # Processed clauses                    : 97
% 7.42/2.35  # ...of these trivial                  : 1
% 7.42/2.35  # ...subsumed                          : 2
% 7.42/2.35  # ...remaining for further processing  : 94
% 7.42/2.35  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 7
% 7.42/2.35  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 7.42/2.35  # Backward-subsumed                    : 4
% 7.42/2.35  # Backward-rewritten                   : 1
% 7.42/2.35  # Generated clauses                    : 410
% 7.42/2.35  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 379
% 7.42/2.35  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 1
% 7.42/2.35  # Paramodulations                      : 390
% 7.42/2.35  # Factorizations                       : 10
% 7.42/2.35  # Equation resolutions                 : 10
% 7.42/2.35  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 7.42/2.35  # Propositional unsat check successes  : 0
% 7.42/2.35  # Current number of processed clauses  : 85
% 7.42/2.35  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 13
% 7.42/2.35  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 7.42/2.35  #    Negative unit clauses             : 3
% 7.42/2.35  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 69
% 7.42/2.35  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 344
% 7.42/2.35  # ...number of literals in the above   : 1014
% 7.42/2.35  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 7.42/2.35  # Current number of archived clauses   : 5
% 7.42/2.35  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1205
% 7.42/2.35  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1105
% 7.42/2.35  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 7
% 7.42/2.35  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 302
% 7.42/2.35  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 7.42/2.35  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 15
% 7.42/2.35  # BW rewrite match successes           : 1
% 7.42/2.35  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 7.42/2.35  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 7.42/2.35  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 11773
% 7.42/2.35  
% 7.42/2.35  # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.42/2.35  # User time                : 0.015 s
% 7.42/2.35  # System time              : 0.002 s
% 7.42/2.35  # Total time               : 0.017 s
% 7.42/2.35  # ...preprocessing         : 0.010 s
% 7.42/2.35  # ...main loop             : 0.007 s
% 7.42/2.35  # Maximum resident set size: 7140 pages
% 7.42/2.35  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------