TSTP Solution File: SET085-7 by Metis---2.4

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Metis---2.4
% Problem  : SET085-7 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : metis --show proof --show saturation %s

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 03:32:24 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 169.50s 169.68s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 169.50s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   14
%            Number of leaves      :   16
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   50 (  12 unt;  18 nHn;  39 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   96 (  57 equ;  35 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   23 (   3 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(unordered_pair2,axiom,
    ( ~ member(X,universal_class)
    | member(X,unordered_pair(X,Y)) ) ).

cnf(regularity1,axiom,
    ( X = null_class
    | member(regular(X),X) ) ).

cnf(unordered_pair_equals_singleton2,axiom,
    ( member(X,universal_class)
    | unordered_pair(X,Y) = singleton(Y) ) ).

cnf(corollary_to_set_in_its_singleton,axiom,
    ( ~ member(X,universal_class)
    | singleton(X) != null_class ) ).

cnf(only_member_in_singleton,axiom,
    ( ~ member(Y,singleton(X))
    | Y = X ) ).

cnf(prove_singleton_in_unordered_pair3_1,negated_conjecture,
    unordered_pair(y,z) = singleton(x) ).

cnf(prove_singleton_in_unordered_pair3_2,negated_conjecture,
    member(x,universal_class) ).

cnf(prove_singleton_in_unordered_pair3_3,negated_conjecture,
    x != y ).

cnf(prove_singleton_in_unordered_pair3_4,negated_conjecture,
    x != z ).

cnf(refute_0_0,plain,
    ( ~ member(z,singleton(x))
    | z = x ),
    inference(subst,[],[only_member_in_singleton:[bind(X,$fot(x)),bind(Y,$fot(z))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_1,plain,
    ( singleton(X_93) = null_class
    | member(regular(singleton(X_93)),singleton(X_93)) ),
    inference(subst,[],[regularity1:[bind(X,$fot(singleton(X_93)))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_2,plain,
    ( singleton(X_91) = null_class
    | member(regular(singleton(X_91)),singleton(X_91)) ),
    inference(subst,[],[regularity1:[bind(X,$fot(singleton(X_91)))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_3,plain,
    ( ~ member(regular(singleton(X_91)),singleton(X_91))
    | regular(singleton(X_91)) = X_91 ),
    inference(subst,[],[only_member_in_singleton:[bind(X,$fot(X_91)),bind(Y,$fot(regular(singleton(X_91))))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_4,plain,
    ( regular(singleton(X_91)) = X_91
    | singleton(X_91) = null_class ),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( member(regular(singleton(X_91)),singleton(X_91)) )],[refute_0_2,refute_0_3]) ).

cnf(refute_0_5,plain,
    ( regular(singleton(X_93)) = X_93
    | singleton(X_93) = null_class ),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_4:[bind(X_91,$fot(X_93))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_6,plain,
    ( regular(singleton(X_93)) != X_93
    | ~ member(regular(singleton(X_93)),singleton(X_93))
    | member(X_93,singleton(X_93)) ),
    introduced(tautology,[equality,[$cnf( member(regular(singleton(X_93)),singleton(X_93)) ),[0],$fot(X_93)]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_7,plain,
    ( ~ member(regular(singleton(X_93)),singleton(X_93))
    | singleton(X_93) = null_class
    | member(X_93,singleton(X_93)) ),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(regular(singleton(X_93)),X_93) )],[refute_0_5,refute_0_6]) ).

cnf(refute_0_8,plain,
    ( singleton(X_93) = null_class
    | member(X_93,singleton(X_93)) ),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( member(regular(singleton(X_93)),singleton(X_93)) )],[refute_0_1,refute_0_7]) ).

cnf(refute_0_9,plain,
    ( singleton(z) = null_class
    | member(z,singleton(z)) ),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_8:[bind(X_93,$fot(z))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_10,plain,
    ( ~ member(y,singleton(x))
    | y = x ),
    inference(subst,[],[only_member_in_singleton:[bind(X,$fot(x)),bind(Y,$fot(y))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_11,plain,
    ( ~ member(y,universal_class)
    | member(y,unordered_pair(y,Y)) ),
    inference(subst,[],[unordered_pair2:[bind(X,$fot(y))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_12,plain,
    ( unordered_pair(y,z) = singleton(z)
    | member(y,universal_class) ),
    inference(subst,[],[unordered_pair_equals_singleton2:[bind(X,$fot(y)),bind(Y,$fot(z))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_13,plain,
    ( unordered_pair(y,z) != singleton(x)
    | unordered_pair(y,z) != singleton(z)
    | singleton(z) = singleton(x) ),
    introduced(tautology,[equality,[$cnf( $equal(unordered_pair(y,z),singleton(x)) ),[0],$fot(singleton(z))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_14,plain,
    ( unordered_pair(y,z) != singleton(x)
    | singleton(z) = singleton(x)
    | member(y,universal_class) ),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(unordered_pair(y,z),singleton(z)) )],[refute_0_12,refute_0_13]) ).

cnf(refute_0_15,plain,
    ( singleton(z) = singleton(x)
    | member(y,universal_class) ),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(unordered_pair(y,z),singleton(x)) )],[prove_singleton_in_unordered_pair3_1,refute_0_14]) ).

cnf(refute_0_16,plain,
    ( singleton(z) = singleton(x)
    | member(y,unordered_pair(y,Y)) ),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( member(y,universal_class) )],[refute_0_15,refute_0_11]) ).

cnf(refute_0_17,plain,
    ( singleton(z) = singleton(x)
    | member(y,unordered_pair(y,z)) ),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_16:[bind(Y,$fot(z))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_18,plain,
    ( unordered_pair(y,z) != singleton(x)
    | ~ member(y,unordered_pair(y,z))
    | member(y,singleton(x)) ),
    introduced(tautology,[equality,[$cnf( member(y,unordered_pair(y,z)) ),[1],$fot(singleton(x))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_19,plain,
    ( ~ member(y,unordered_pair(y,z))
    | member(y,singleton(x)) ),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(unordered_pair(y,z),singleton(x)) )],[prove_singleton_in_unordered_pair3_1,refute_0_18]) ).

cnf(refute_0_20,plain,
    ( singleton(z) = singleton(x)
    | member(y,singleton(x)) ),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( member(y,unordered_pair(y,z)) )],[refute_0_17,refute_0_19]) ).

cnf(refute_0_21,plain,
    ( singleton(z) = singleton(x)
    | y = x ),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( member(y,singleton(x)) )],[refute_0_20,refute_0_10]) ).

cnf(refute_0_22,plain,
    X0 = X0,
    introduced(tautology,[refl,[$fot(X0)]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_23,plain,
    ( X0 != X0
    | X0 != Y0
    | Y0 = X0 ),
    introduced(tautology,[equality,[$cnf( $equal(X0,X0) ),[0],$fot(Y0)]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_24,plain,
    ( X0 != Y0
    | Y0 = X0 ),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(X0,X0) )],[refute_0_22,refute_0_23]) ).

cnf(refute_0_25,plain,
    ( y != x
    | x = y ),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_24:[bind(X0,$fot(y)),bind(Y0,$fot(x))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_26,plain,
    y != x,
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(x,y) )],[refute_0_25,prove_singleton_in_unordered_pair3_3]) ).

cnf(refute_0_27,plain,
    singleton(z) = singleton(x),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(y,x) )],[refute_0_21,refute_0_26]) ).

cnf(refute_0_28,plain,
    ( singleton(z) != singleton(x)
    | ~ member(z,singleton(z))
    | member(z,singleton(x)) ),
    introduced(tautology,[equality,[$cnf( member(z,singleton(z)) ),[1],$fot(singleton(x))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_29,plain,
    ( ~ member(z,singleton(z))
    | member(z,singleton(x)) ),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(singleton(z),singleton(x)) )],[refute_0_27,refute_0_28]) ).

cnf(refute_0_30,plain,
    ( singleton(z) = null_class
    | member(z,singleton(x)) ),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( member(z,singleton(z)) )],[refute_0_9,refute_0_29]) ).

cnf(refute_0_31,plain,
    ( singleton(z) != null_class
    | singleton(z) != singleton(x)
    | singleton(x) = null_class ),
    introduced(tautology,[equality,[$cnf( $equal(singleton(z),null_class) ),[0],$fot(singleton(x))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_32,plain,
    ( singleton(z) != null_class
    | singleton(x) = null_class ),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(singleton(z),singleton(x)) )],[refute_0_27,refute_0_31]) ).

cnf(refute_0_33,plain,
    ( singleton(x) = null_class
    | member(z,singleton(x)) ),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(singleton(z),null_class) )],[refute_0_30,refute_0_32]) ).

cnf(refute_0_34,plain,
    ( singleton(x) != null_class
    | ~ member(x,universal_class) ),
    inference(subst,[],[corollary_to_set_in_its_singleton:[bind(X,$fot(x))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_35,plain,
    singleton(x) != null_class,
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( member(x,universal_class) )],[prove_singleton_in_unordered_pair3_2,refute_0_34]) ).

cnf(refute_0_36,plain,
    member(z,singleton(x)),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(singleton(x),null_class) )],[refute_0_33,refute_0_35]) ).

cnf(refute_0_37,plain,
    z = x,
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( member(z,singleton(x)) )],[refute_0_36,refute_0_0]) ).

cnf(refute_0_38,plain,
    ( z != x
    | x = z ),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_24:[bind(X0,$fot(z)),bind(Y0,$fot(x))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_39,plain,
    z != x,
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(x,z) )],[refute_0_38,prove_singleton_in_unordered_pair3_4]) ).

cnf(refute_0_40,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(z,x) )],[refute_0_37,refute_0_39]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12  % Problem  : SET085-7 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.10/0.13  % Command  : metis --show proof --show saturation %s
% 0.14/0.34  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.34  % DateTime : Sun Jul 10 06:33:12 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.14/0.35  %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
% 169.50/169.68  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 169.50/169.68  
% 169.50/169.68  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 169.50/169.68  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------