TSTP Solution File: SET083+1 by SRASS---0.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SRASS---0.1
% Problem  : SET083+1 : TPTP v5.3.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : SRASS -q2 -a 0 10 10 10 -i3 -n60 %s

% Computer : art08.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 i686
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.00GHz @ 3000MHz
% Memory   : 2005MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.32.26-175.fc12.i686.PAE
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Jun 15 11:07:17 EDT 2012

% Result   : Theorem 0.66s
% Output   : Solution 0.66s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ERROR: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Reading problem from /tmp/SystemOnTPTP29302/SET083+1.tptp
% Adding relevance values
% Extracting the conjecture
% Sorting axioms by relevance
% Looking for THM       ... 
% found
% SZS status THM for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP29302/SET083+1.tptp
% SZS output start Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP29302/SET083+1.tptp
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% TreeLimitedRun: /home/graph/tptp/Systems/EP---1.5/eproof_ram --print-statistics -xAuto -tAuto --cpu-limit=60 --memory-limit=Auto --tstp-format /tmp/SRASS.s.p 
% TreeLimitedRun: CPU time limit is 60s
% TreeLimitedRun: WC  time limit is 120s
% TreeLimitedRun: PID is 29416
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% PrfWatch: 0.00 CPU 0.02 WC
% # Auto-Ordering is analysing problem.
% # Problem is type GHSMNFFMM21MD
% # Auto-mode selected ordering type KBO6
% # Auto-mode selected ordering precedence scheme <invfreqconjmax>
% # Auto-mode selected weight ordering scheme <invfreqrank>
% #
% # Auto-Heuristic is analysing problem.
% # Problem is type GHSMNFFMM21MD
% # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___107_C45_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_S0Y
% # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred.
% #
% # Initializing proof state
% # Scanning for AC axioms
% # Proof found!
% # SZS status Theorem
% # Parsed axioms                      : 44
% # Removed by relevancy pruning       : 0
% # Initial clauses                    : 92
% # Removed in clause preprocessing    : 8
% # Initial clauses in saturation      : 84
% # Processed clauses                  : 117
% # ...of these trivial                : 3
% # ...subsumed                        : 9
% # ...remaining for further processing: 105
% # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 5
% # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% # Backward-subsumed                  : 5
% # Backward-rewritten                 : 1
% # Generated clauses                  : 361
% # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 323
% # Contextual simplify-reflections    : 3
% # Paramodulations                    : 354
% # Factorizations                     : 0
% # Equation resolutions               : 7
% # Current number of processed clauses: 95
% #    Positive orientable unit clauses: 22
% #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% #    Negative unit clauses           : 2
% #    Non-unit-clauses                : 71
% # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 257
% # ...number of literals in the above : 694
% # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 883
% # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 749
% # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions: 11
% # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 99
% # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound  : 0
% # BW rewrite match attempts          : 14
% # BW rewrite match successes         : 1
% # Backwards rewriting index :   762 nodes,   134 leaves,   1.70+/-1.550 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-from index      :   289 nodes,    48 leaves,   1.02+/-0.143 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-into index      :   593 nodes,   100 leaves,   1.58+/-1.471 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-neg-atom index  :   160 nodes,    30 leaves,   1.30+/-0.458 terms/leaf
% # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% fof(1, axiom,![X1]:singleton(X1)=unordered_pair(X1,X1),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', singleton_set_defn)).
% fof(2, axiom,![X2]:![X1]:![X3]:(member(X2,unordered_pair(X1,X3))<=>(member(X2,universal_class)&(X2=X1|X2=X3))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', unordered_pair_defn)).
% fof(44, conjecture,![X1]:![X3]:((singleton(X1)=singleton(X3)&member(X1,universal_class))=>X1=X3),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', singleton_identified_by_element1)).
% fof(45, negated_conjecture,~(![X1]:![X3]:((singleton(X1)=singleton(X3)&member(X1,universal_class))=>X1=X3)),inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[44])).
% fof(48, plain,![X2]:singleton(X2)=unordered_pair(X2,X2),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[1])).
% cnf(49,plain,(singleton(X1)=unordered_pair(X1,X1)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[48])).
% fof(50, plain,![X2]:![X1]:![X3]:((~(member(X2,unordered_pair(X1,X3)))|(member(X2,universal_class)&(X2=X1|X2=X3)))&((~(member(X2,universal_class))|(~(X2=X1)&~(X2=X3)))|member(X2,unordered_pair(X1,X3)))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[2])).
% fof(51, plain,(![X2]:![X1]:![X3]:(~(member(X2,unordered_pair(X1,X3)))|(member(X2,universal_class)&(X2=X1|X2=X3)))&![X2]:![X1]:![X3]:((~(member(X2,universal_class))|(~(X2=X1)&~(X2=X3)))|member(X2,unordered_pair(X1,X3)))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[50])).
% fof(52, plain,(![X4]:![X5]:![X6]:(~(member(X4,unordered_pair(X5,X6)))|(member(X4,universal_class)&(X4=X5|X4=X6)))&![X7]:![X8]:![X9]:((~(member(X7,universal_class))|(~(X7=X8)&~(X7=X9)))|member(X7,unordered_pair(X8,X9)))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[51])).
% fof(53, plain,![X4]:![X5]:![X6]:![X7]:![X8]:![X9]:((~(member(X4,unordered_pair(X5,X6)))|(member(X4,universal_class)&(X4=X5|X4=X6)))&((~(member(X7,universal_class))|(~(X7=X8)&~(X7=X9)))|member(X7,unordered_pair(X8,X9)))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[52])).
% fof(54, plain,![X4]:![X5]:![X6]:![X7]:![X8]:![X9]:(((member(X4,universal_class)|~(member(X4,unordered_pair(X5,X6))))&((X4=X5|X4=X6)|~(member(X4,unordered_pair(X5,X6)))))&(((~(X7=X8)|~(member(X7,universal_class)))|member(X7,unordered_pair(X8,X9)))&((~(X7=X9)|~(member(X7,universal_class)))|member(X7,unordered_pair(X8,X9))))),inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[53])).
% cnf(55,plain,(member(X1,unordered_pair(X2,X3))|~member(X1,universal_class)|X1!=X3),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[54])).
% cnf(57,plain,(X1=X3|X1=X2|~member(X1,unordered_pair(X2,X3))),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[54])).
% fof(273, negated_conjecture,?[X1]:?[X3]:((singleton(X1)=singleton(X3)&member(X1,universal_class))&~(X1=X3)),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[45])).
% fof(274, negated_conjecture,?[X4]:?[X5]:((singleton(X4)=singleton(X5)&member(X4,universal_class))&~(X4=X5)),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[273])).
% fof(275, negated_conjecture,((singleton(esk8_0)=singleton(esk9_0)&member(esk8_0,universal_class))&~(esk8_0=esk9_0)),inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[274])).
% cnf(276,negated_conjecture,(esk8_0!=esk9_0),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[275])).
% cnf(277,negated_conjecture,(member(esk8_0,universal_class)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[275])).
% cnf(278,negated_conjecture,(singleton(esk8_0)=singleton(esk9_0)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[275])).
% cnf(279,negated_conjecture,(unordered_pair(esk9_0,esk9_0)=unordered_pair(esk8_0,esk8_0)),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[278,49,theory(equality)]),49,theory(equality)]),['unfolding']).
% cnf(344,plain,(member(X1,unordered_pair(X2,X1))|~member(X1,universal_class)),inference(er,[status(thm)],[55,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(346,negated_conjecture,(X1=esk9_0|~member(X1,unordered_pair(esk8_0,esk8_0))),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[57,279,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(725,negated_conjecture,(esk8_0=esk9_0|~member(esk8_0,universal_class)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[346,344,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(730,negated_conjecture,(esk8_0=esk9_0|$false),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[725,277,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(731,negated_conjecture,(esk8_0=esk9_0),inference(cn,[status(thm)],[730,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(732,negated_conjecture,($false),inference(sr,[status(thm)],[731,276,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(733,negated_conjecture,($false),732,['proof']).
% # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% PrfWatch: 0.08 CPU 0.18 WC
% FINAL PrfWatch: 0.08 CPU 0.18 WC
% SZS output end Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP29302/SET083+1.tptp
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------