TSTP Solution File: SET079+1 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : SET079+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 00:09:09 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 7.37s 2.36s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 7.37s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   10 (   7 unt;   0 nHn;   7 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   15 (   4 equ;   7 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   10 (   5 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_88,plain,
    ( member(X1,unordered_pair(X2,X3))
    | X1 != X3
    | ~ member(X1,universal_class) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-9k96o7bd/lgb.p',i_0_88) ).

cnf(i_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    unordered_pair(esk2_0,esk2_0) = null_class,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-9k96o7bd/lgb.p',i_0_12) ).

cnf(i_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    member(esk2_0,universal_class),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-9k96o7bd/lgb.p',i_0_13) ).

cnf(i_0_54,plain,
    ~ member(X1,null_class),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-9k96o7bd/lgb.p',i_0_54) ).

cnf(c_0_93,plain,
    ( member(X1,unordered_pair(X2,X3))
    | X1 != X3
    | ~ member(X1,universal_class) ),
    i_0_88 ).

cnf(c_0_94,plain,
    ( member(X1,unordered_pair(X2,X1))
    | ~ member(X1,universal_class) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_93]) ).

cnf(c_0_95,negated_conjecture,
    unordered_pair(esk2_0,esk2_0) = null_class,
    i_0_12 ).

cnf(c_0_96,negated_conjecture,
    member(esk2_0,universal_class),
    i_0_13 ).

cnf(c_0_97,plain,
    ~ member(X1,null_class),
    i_0_54 ).

cnf(c_0_98,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_94,c_0_95]),c_0_96])]),c_0_97]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : SET079+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Sun Jul 10 05:26:12 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.45  # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.19/0.46  # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.46  # Filter: axfilter_auto   0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   0.p
% 0.19/0.46  # Filter: axfilter_auto   1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   1.p
% 0.19/0.46  # Filter: axfilter_auto   2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   2.p
% 7.37/2.36  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 7.37/2.36  # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.37/2.36  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.37/2.36  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 7.37/2.36  # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 7.37/2.36  #
% 7.37/2.36  # Preprocessing time       : 0.015 s
% 7.37/2.36  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 7.37/2.36  
% 7.37/2.36  # Proof found!
% 7.37/2.36  # SZS status Theorem
% 7.37/2.36  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.37/2.36  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.37/2.36  
% 7.37/2.36  # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.37/2.36  # User time                : 0.016 s
% 7.37/2.36  # System time              : 0.004 s
% 7.37/2.36  # Total time               : 0.020 s
% 7.37/2.36  # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 7.37/2.36  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------