TSTP Solution File: SET076+1 by ET---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : SET076+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 00:48:48 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.22s 1.40s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.22s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   17 (   4 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   54 (  11 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   11 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   54 (  17   ~;  22   |;  10   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   13 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   39 (   5 sgn  23   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(unordered_pair_defn,axiom,
    ! [X3,X1,X2] :
      ( member(X3,unordered_pair(X1,X2))
    <=> ( member(X3,universal_class)
        & ( X3 = X1
          | X3 = X2 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET005+0.ax',unordered_pair_defn) ).

fof(subclass_defn,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( subclass(X1,X2)
    <=> ! [X3] :
          ( member(X3,X1)
         => member(X3,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET005+0.ax',subclass_defn) ).

fof(unordered_pair_is_subset,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2,X5] :
      ( ( member(X1,X5)
        & member(X2,X5) )
     => subclass(unordered_pair(X1,X2),X5) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',unordered_pair_is_subset) ).

fof(c_0_3,plain,
    ! [X4,X5,X6,X4,X5,X6] :
      ( ( member(X4,universal_class)
        | ~ member(X4,unordered_pair(X5,X6)) )
      & ( X4 = X5
        | X4 = X6
        | ~ member(X4,unordered_pair(X5,X6)) )
      & ( X4 != X5
        | ~ member(X4,universal_class)
        | member(X4,unordered_pair(X5,X6)) )
      & ( X4 != X6
        | ~ member(X4,universal_class)
        | member(X4,unordered_pair(X5,X6)) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[unordered_pair_defn])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_4,plain,
    ! [X4,X5,X6,X4,X5] :
      ( ( ~ subclass(X4,X5)
        | ~ member(X6,X4)
        | member(X6,X5) )
      & ( member(esk4_2(X4,X5),X4)
        | subclass(X4,X5) )
      & ( ~ member(esk4_2(X4,X5),X5)
        | subclass(X4,X5) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[subclass_defn])])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_5,plain,
    ( X1 = X3
    | X1 = X2
    | ~ member(X1,unordered_pair(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,plain,
    ( subclass(X1,X2)
    | member(esk4_2(X1,X2),X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2,X5] :
        ( ( member(X1,X5)
          & member(X2,X5) )
       => subclass(unordered_pair(X1,X2),X5) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[unordered_pair_is_subset]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    ( subclass(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(esk4_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( esk4_2(unordered_pair(X1,X2),X3) = X2
    | esk4_2(unordered_pair(X1,X2),X3) = X1
    | subclass(unordered_pair(X1,X2),X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]) ).

fof(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ( member(esk1_0,esk3_0)
    & member(esk2_0,esk3_0)
    & ~ subclass(unordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),esk3_0) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( esk4_2(unordered_pair(X1,X2),X3) = X2
    | subclass(unordered_pair(X1,X2),X3)
    | ~ member(X1,X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ~ subclass(unordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),esk3_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( subclass(unordered_pair(X1,X2),X3)
    | ~ member(X2,X3)
    | ~ member(X1,X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    member(esk2_0,esk3_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    member(esk1_0,esk3_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_14]),c_0_15])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : SET076+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% 0.07/0.12  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 05:00:42 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.22/1.40  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.22/1.40  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.22/1.40  # Preprocessing time       : 0.016 s
% 0.22/1.40  
% 0.22/1.40  # Proof found!
% 0.22/1.40  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.22/1.40  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.22/1.40  # Proof object total steps             : 17
% 0.22/1.40  # Proof object clause steps            : 10
% 0.22/1.40  # Proof object formula steps           : 7
% 0.22/1.40  # Proof object conjectures             : 7
% 0.22/1.40  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 4
% 0.22/1.40  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 0.22/1.40  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 6
% 0.22/1.40  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 3
% 0.22/1.40  # Proof object generating inferences   : 4
% 0.22/1.40  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 3
% 0.22/1.40  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.22/1.40  # Parsed axioms                        : 44
% 0.22/1.40  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 35
% 0.22/1.40  # Initial clauses                      : 20
% 0.22/1.40  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 2
% 0.22/1.40  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 18
% 0.22/1.40  # Processed clauses                    : 40
% 0.22/1.40  # ...of these trivial                  : 2
% 0.22/1.40  # ...subsumed                          : 1
% 0.22/1.40  # ...remaining for further processing  : 37
% 0.22/1.40  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 6
% 0.22/1.40  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.22/1.40  # Backward-subsumed                    : 1
% 0.22/1.40  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.22/1.40  # Generated clauses                    : 60
% 0.22/1.40  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 42
% 0.22/1.40  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.22/1.40  # Paramodulations                      : 52
% 0.22/1.40  # Factorizations                       : 2
% 0.22/1.40  # Equation resolutions                 : 6
% 0.22/1.40  # Current number of processed clauses  : 32
% 0.22/1.40  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 7
% 0.22/1.40  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.22/1.40  #    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.22/1.40  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 24
% 0.22/1.40  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 19
% 0.22/1.40  # ...number of literals in the above   : 60
% 0.22/1.40  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.22/1.40  # Current number of archived clauses   : 3
% 0.22/1.40  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 42
% 0.22/1.40  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 35
% 0.22/1.40  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 2
% 0.22/1.40  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.22/1.40  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.22/1.40  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 6
% 0.22/1.40  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.22/1.40  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.22/1.40  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.22/1.40  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 2069
% 0.22/1.40  
% 0.22/1.40  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/1.40  # User time                : 0.016 s
% 0.22/1.40  # System time              : 0.002 s
% 0.22/1.40  # Total time               : 0.018 s
% 0.22/1.40  # Maximum resident set size: 2776 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------