TSTP Solution File: SET074-7 by SNARK---20120808r022

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : SET074-7 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 05:06:55 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.61s 0.78s
% Output   : Refutation 0.61s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    2
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    6 (   5 unt;   0 nHn;   4 RR)
%            Number of literals    :    7 (   1 equ;   2 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    4 (   3 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(unordered_pair2,axiom,
    ( ~ member(X,universal_class)
    | member(X,unordered_pair(X,Y)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',unordered_pair2) ).

cnf(existence_of_null_class,axiom,
    ~ member(X,null_class),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',existence_of_null_class) ).

cnf(prove_corollary_to_unordered_pair_axiom2_1,negated_conjecture,
    member(y,universal_class),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_corollary_to_unordered_pair_axiom2_1) ).

cnf(prove_corollary_to_unordered_pair_axiom2_2,negated_conjecture,
    unordered_pair(x,y) = null_class,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_corollary_to_unordered_pair_axiom2_2) ).

cnf(148,plain,
    member(y,unordered_pair(y,X)),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[unordered_pair2,prove_corollary_to_unordered_pair_axiom2_1]) ).

cnf(1112,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[148,prove_corollary_to_unordered_pair_axiom2_2,theory(equality)]),existence_of_null_class]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.11  % Problem  : SET074-7 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.10/0.12  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime : Sun Jul 10 11:51:57 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.44  /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.45  * 
% 0.19/0.45  * 
% 0.19/0.45  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.19/0.45  * 
% 0.19/0.45  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.19/0.45  * 
% 0.19/0.45  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.19/0.45   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.19/0.45   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.19/0.45   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.45   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.45   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.19/0.45   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.19/0.45   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.19/0.45   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.19/0.45   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.19/0.45   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.19/0.45   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.19/0.45   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.19/0.45  * 
% 0.19/0.45  "."
% 0.19/0.45  * 
% 0.19/0.46  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-10T11:51:57
% 0.19/0.46  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n028.cluster.edu at 2022-07-10T11:51:57
% 0.19/0.49  
% 0.19/0.49  ; Recognized commutativity assertion (= (|unordered_pair| ?X ?Y) (|unordered_pair| ?Y ?X)).
% 0.61/0.78  ; Declaring unordered_pair to be commutative.
% 0.61/0.78  
% 0.61/0.78  #||
% 0.61/0.78  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.61/0.78  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.61/0.78  ||#
% 0.61/0.78  
% 0.61/0.78  ; Summary of computation:
% 0.61/0.78  ;      2526 formulas have been input or derived (from 140 formulas).
% 0.61/0.78  ;      1112 (44%) were retained.  Of these,
% 0.61/0.78  ;           31 ( 3%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.61/0.78  ;         1081 (97%) are still being kept.
% 0.61/0.78  ; 
% 0.61/0.78  ; Run time in seconds:
% 0.61/0.78  ;     0.021   7%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 0.61/0.78  ;     0.003   1%   Assert                       (117 calls)
% 0.61/0.78  ;     0.094  29%   Process new row              (2,215 calls)
% 0.61/0.78  ;     0.051  16%   Resolution                   (278 calls)
% 0.61/0.78  ;     0.004   1%   Paramodulation               (139 calls)
% 0.61/0.78  ;     0.000   0%   Factoring                    (8 calls)
% 0.61/0.78  ;     0.012   4%   Condensing                   (785 calls)
% 0.61/0.78  ;     0.035  11%   Forward subsumption          (785 calls)
% 0.61/0.78  ;     0.013   4%   Backward subsumption         (570 calls)
% 0.61/0.78  ;     0.005   2%   Clause clause subsumption    (1,018 calls)
% 0.61/0.78  ;     0.039  12%   Forward simplification       (2,168 calls)
% 0.61/0.78  ;     0.006   2%   Backward simplification      (1,100 calls)
% 0.61/0.78  ;     0.004   1%   Ordering                     (2,201 calls)
% 0.61/0.78  ;     0.000   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 0.61/0.78  ;     0.001   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 0.61/0.78  ;     0.033  10%   Other
% 0.61/0.78  ;     0.321        Total
% 0.61/0.78  ;     0.322        Real time
% 0.61/0.78  ; 
% 0.61/0.78  ; Term-hash-array has 1,992 terms in all.
% 0.61/0.78  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 555 entries (555 at peak, 570 added, 15 deleted).
% 0.61/0.78  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 2,620 nodes (2,620 at peak, 2,740 added, 120 deleted).
% 0.61/0.78  ;  Retrieved 1,632 possibly forward subsuming rows in 785 calls.
% 0.61/0.78  ;  Retrieved 301 possibly backward subsumed rows in 570 calls.
% 0.61/0.78  ; Path-index has 1,997 entries (1,997 at peak, 2,042 added, 45 deleted).
% 0.61/0.78  ; Path-index has 3,211 nodes (3,211 at peak, 3,247 added, 36 deleted).
% 0.61/0.78  ; Trie-index has 1,997 entries (1,997 at peak, 2,042 added, 45 deleted).
% 0.61/0.78  ; Trie-index has 5,658 nodes (5,658 at peak, 5,755 added, 97 deleted).
% 0.61/0.78  ; Retrieved 1,741 generalization terms in 6,581 calls.
% 0.61/0.78  ; Retrieved 551 instance terms in 529 calls.
% 0.61/0.78  ; Retrieved 51,003 unifiable terms in 2,173 calls.
% 0.61/0.78  ; 
% 0.61/0.78  ; The agenda of rows to process has 116 entries:
% 0.61/0.78  ;     1 with value 8              20 with value 14               6 with value 20
% 0.61/0.78  ;     3 with value 9              40 with value 15               2 with value 22
% 0.61/0.78  ;     2 with value 10             16 with value 16               4 with value 23
% 0.61/0.78  ;     1 with value 11              3 with value 18               4 with value 25
% 0.61/0.78  ;     4 with value 12              2 with value 19               4 with value 27
% 0.61/0.78  ;     4 with value 13
% 0.61/0.78  ; The agenda of rows to give has 944 entries:
% 0.61/0.78  ;    19 with value (4 8)          23 with value (4 22)           7 with value (4 35)
% 0.61/0.78  ;    29 with value (4 9)          22 with value (4 23)           3 with value (4 37)
% 0.61/0.78  ;    52 with value (4 10)         41 with value (4 24)           1 with value (4 38)
% 0.61/0.78  ;    44 with value (4 11)         11 with value (4 25)           1 with value (4 42)
% 0.61/0.78  ;    28 with value (4 12)         29 with value (4 26)           1 with value (4 43)
% 0.61/0.78  ;   106 with value (4 13)         13 with value (4 27)           1 with value (4 44)
% 0.61/0.78  ;   132 with value (4 14)          7 with value (4 28)           1 with value (4 45)
% 0.61/0.78  ;    83 with value (4 15)         11 with value (4 29)           3 with value (4 46)
% 0.61/0.78  ;    35 with value (4 16)         11 with value (4 30)           1 with value (4 49)
% 0.61/0.78  ;    20 with value (4 17)          3 with value (4 31)           1 with value (4 51)
% 0.61/0.78  ;    53 with value (4 18)          9 with value (4 32)           1 with value (4 53)
% 0.61/0.78  ;    74 with value (4 19)          2 with value (4 33)           1 with value (4 59)
% 0.61/0.78  ;    21 with value (4 20)          2 with value (4 34)           1 with value (4 63)
% 0.61/0.78  ;    41 with value (4 21)
% 0.61/0.78  Evaluation took:
% 0.61/0.78    0.323 seconds of real time
% 0.61/0.78    0.295101 seconds of user run time
% 0.61/0.78    0.027652 seconds of system run time
% 0.61/0.78    [Run times include 0.01 seconds GC run time.]
% 0.61/0.78    0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.61/0.78    0 page faults and
% 0.61/0.78    21,009,528 bytes consed.
% 0.61/0.78  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.61/0.78  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-10T11:51:57
% 0.61/0.78  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.61/0.78  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------