TSTP Solution File: SET074-6 by SNARK---20120808r022
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem : SET074-6 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run-snark %s %d
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 05:06:55 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.92s 1.16s
% Output : Refutation 1.00s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 15 ( 9 unt; 2 nHn; 10 RR)
% Number of literals : 22 ( 5 equ; 9 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 13 ( 3 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(subclass_members,axiom,
( ~ subclass(X,Y)
| ~ member(Z,X)
| member(Z,Y) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',subclass_members) ).
cnf(class_elements_are_sets,axiom,
subclass(X,universal_class),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',class_elements_are_sets) ).
cnf(equal_implies_subclass1,axiom,
( X != Y
| subclass(X,Y) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',equal_implies_subclass1) ).
cnf(unordered_pair3,axiom,
( ~ member(X,universal_class)
| member(X,unordered_pair(Y,X)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',unordered_pair3) ).
cnf(complement1,axiom,
( ~ member(X,complement(Y))
| ~ member(X,Y) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',complement1) ).
cnf(regularity1,axiom,
( X = null_class
| member(regular(X),X) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',regularity1) ).
cnf(prove_corollary_to_unordered_pair_axiom2_1,negated_conjecture,
member(y,universal_class),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_corollary_to_unordered_pair_axiom2_1) ).
cnf(prove_corollary_to_unordered_pair_axiom2_2,negated_conjecture,
unordered_pair(x,y) = null_class,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_corollary_to_unordered_pair_axiom2_2) ).
cnf(111,plain,
~ member(y,complement(universal_class)),
inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[complement1,prove_corollary_to_unordered_pair_axiom2_1]) ).
cnf(128,plain,
member(y,unordered_pair(X,y)),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[unordered_pair3,prove_corollary_to_unordered_pair_axiom2_1]) ).
cnf(135,plain,
( X = null_class
| member(regular(X),universal_class) ),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[subclass_members,class_elements_are_sets,regularity1]) ).
cnf(541,plain,
member(y,null_class),
inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[128,prove_corollary_to_unordered_pair_axiom2_2,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(579,plain,
~ subclass(null_class,complement(universal_class)),
inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[subclass_members,541,111]) ).
cnf(1648,plain,
null_class != complement(universal_class),
inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[equal_implies_subclass1,579]) ).
cnf(4637,plain,
$false,
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[complement1,135,regularity1]),1648]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : SET074-6 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.11/0.13 % Command : run-snark %s %d
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Jul 9 17:05:08 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.46 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.47 *
% 0.19/0.47 *
% 0.19/0.47 #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.19/0.47 *
% 0.19/0.47 SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.19/0.47 *
% 0.19/0.47 ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.19/0.47 (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.19/0.47 (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.19/0.47 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.47 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.47 (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.19/0.47 (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.19/0.47 (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.19/0.47 (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.19/0.47 (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.19/0.47 (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.19/0.47 (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.19/0.47 (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.19/0.47 *
% 0.19/0.47 "."
% 0.19/0.47 *
% 0.19/0.47 ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-09T17:05:08
% 0.19/0.47 ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n008.cluster.edu at 2022-07-09T17:05:08
% 0.92/1.16
% 0.92/1.16
% 0.92/1.16 #||
% 0.92/1.16 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.92/1.16 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 1.00/1.18 ||#
% 1.00/1.18
% 1.00/1.18 ; Summary of computation:
% 1.00/1.18 ; 9485 formulas have been input or derived (from 195 formulas).
% 1.00/1.18 ; 4637 (49%) were retained. Of these,
% 1.00/1.18 ; 13 ( 0%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 1.00/1.18 ; 4624 (100%) are still being kept.
% 1.00/1.18 ;
% 1.00/1.18 ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 1.00/1.18 ; 0.017 2% Read assertion file (1 call)
% 1.00/1.18 ; 0.003 0% Assert (93 calls)
% 1.00/1.18 ; 0.256 37% Process new row (9,021 calls)
% 1.00/1.18 ; 0.195 28% Resolution (388 calls)
% 1.00/1.18 ; 0.006 1% Paramodulation (194 calls)
% 1.00/1.18 ; 0.000 0% Factoring (4 calls)
% 1.00/1.18 ; 0.007 1% Condensing (418 calls)
% 1.00/1.18 ; 0.033 5% Forward subsumption (418 calls)
% 1.00/1.18 ; 0.013 2% Backward subsumption (405 calls)
% 1.00/1.18 ; 0.001 0% Clause clause subsumption (299 calls)
% 1.00/1.18 ; 0.073 11% Forward simplification (9,021 calls)
% 1.00/1.18 ; 0.033 5% Backward simplification (4,625 calls)
% 1.00/1.18 ; 0.002 0% Ordering (876 calls)
% 1.00/1.18 ; 0.000 0% Sortal reasoning (32 calls)
% 1.00/1.18 ; 0.001 0% Purity testing (1 call)
% 1.00/1.18 ; 0.050 7% Other
% 1.00/1.18 ; 0.690 Total
% 1.00/1.18 ; 0.707 Real time
% 1.00/1.18 ;
% 1.00/1.18 ; Term-hash-array has 7,271 terms in all.
% 1.00/1.18 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 405 entries (405 at peak, 405 added, 0 deleted).
% 1.00/1.18 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 1,919 nodes (1,919 at peak, 1,919 added, 0 deleted).
% 1.00/1.18 ; Retrieved 387 possibly forward subsuming rows in 418 calls.
% 1.00/1.18 ; Retrieved 248 possibly backward subsumed rows in 405 calls.
% 1.00/1.18 ; Path-index has 7,280 entries (7,280 at peak, 7,281 added, 1 deleted).
% 1.00/1.18 ; Path-index has 4,292 nodes (4,292 at peak, 4,293 added, 1 deleted).
% 1.00/1.18 ; Trie-index has 7,280 entries (7,280 at peak, 7,281 added, 1 deleted).
% 1.00/1.18 ; Trie-index has 20,793 nodes (20,793 at peak, 20,794 added, 1 deleted).
% 1.00/1.18 ; Retrieved 6,156 generalization terms in 22,876 calls.
% 1.00/1.18 ; Retrieved 4,237 instance terms in 4,219 calls.
% 1.00/1.18 ; Retrieved 431,218 unifiable terms in 7,270 calls.
% 1.00/1.18 ;
% 1.00/1.18 ; The agenda of rows to process has 137 entries:
% 1.00/1.18 ; 1 with value 12 2 with value 16 16 with value 20
% 1.00/1.18 ; 1 with value 13 8 with value 17 54 with value 21
% 1.00/1.18 ; 6 with value 14 12 with value 18 5 with value 22
% 1.00/1.18 ; 1 with value 15 30 with value 19 1 with value 27
% 1.00/1.18 ; The agenda of rows to give has 4429 entries:
% 1.00/1.18 ; 78 with value (4 11) 5 with value (4 22) 2 with value (4 34)
% 1.00/1.18 ; 101 with value (4 12) 10 with value (4 23) 2 with value (4 37)
% 1.00/1.18 ; 197 with value (4 13) 17 with value (4 24) 1 with value (4 43)
% 1.00/1.18 ; 271 with value (4 14) 4 with value (4 25) 1 with value (4 44)
% 1.00/1.18 ; 364 with value (4 15) 7 with value (4 26) 1 with value (4 45)
% 1.00/1.18 ; 682 with value (4 16) 16 with value (4 28) 3 with value (4 46)
% 1.00/1.18 ; 697 with value (4 17) 5 with value (4 29) 1 with value (4 49)
% 1.00/1.18 ; 1107 with value (4 18) 3 with value (4 30) 1 with value (4 51)
% 1.00/1.18 ; 462 with value (4 19) 1 with value (4 31) 1 with value (4 53)
% 1.00/1.18 ; 312 with value (4 20) 1 with value (4 32) 1 with value (4 59)
% 1.00/1.18 ; 72 with value (4 21) 2 with value (4 33) 1 with value (4 63)
% 1.00/1.18 Evaluation took:
% 1.00/1.18 0.708 seconds of real time
% 1.00/1.18 0.650783 seconds of user run time
% 1.00/1.18 0.057231 seconds of system run time
% 1.00/1.18 [Run times include 0.06 seconds GC run time.]
% 1.00/1.18 0 calls to %EVAL
% 1.00/1.18 0 page faults and
% 1.00/1.18 51,113,000 bytes consed.
% 1.00/1.18 :PROOF-FOUND
% 1.00/1.18 ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-09T17:05:09
% 1.00/1.18 :PROOF-FOUND
% 1.00/1.18 *
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------