TSTP Solution File: SET074+1 by SNARK---20120808r022

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : SET074+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 05:06:54 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.79s 0.99s
% Output   : Refutation 0.79s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    2
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    6 (   5 unt;   0 nHn;   4 RR)
%            Number of literals    :    8 (   2 equ;   3 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    5 (   3 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(10,axiom,
    ( member(X,unordered_pair(Y,Z))
    | ~ member(X,universal_class)
    | X != Z ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET005+0.ax',unordered_pair_defn) ).

cnf(31,axiom,
    ~ member(X,null_class),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET005+0.ax',null_class_defn) ).

cnf(92,negated_conjecture,
    member('SKOLEMAAAW9',universal_class),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',corollary1_2) ).

cnf(93,negated_conjecture,
    unordered_pair('SKOLEMAAAW8','SKOLEMAAAW9') = null_class,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',corollary1_2) ).

cnf(272,plain,
    member('SKOLEMAAAW9',unordered_pair(X,'SKOLEMAAAW9')),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[10,92,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(2078,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[272,93,theory(equality)]),31]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.13/0.14  % Problem  : SET074+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% 0.13/0.15  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.15/0.37  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.37  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.37  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.37  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.15/0.37  % DateTime : Sat Jul  9 20:15:17 EDT 2022
% 0.15/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.23/0.51  /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/0.52  * 
% 0.23/0.52  * 
% 0.23/0.53  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.23/0.53  * 
% 0.23/0.53  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.23/0.53  * 
% 0.23/0.53  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.23/0.53   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.23/0.53   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.23/0.53   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.23/0.53   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.23/0.53   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.23/0.53   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.23/0.53   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.23/0.53   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.23/0.53   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.23/0.53   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.23/0.53   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.23/0.53   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.23/0.53  * 
% 0.23/0.53  "."
% 0.23/0.53  * 
% 0.23/0.53  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-09T20:15:17
% 0.23/0.53  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n017.cluster.edu at 2022-07-09T20:15:17
% 0.79/0.99  
% 0.79/0.99  
% 0.79/0.99  #||
% 0.79/0.99  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.79/0.99  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.79/0.99  ||#
% 0.79/0.99  
% 0.79/0.99  ; Summary of computation:
% 0.79/0.99  ;      4280 formulas have been input or derived (from 137 formulas).
% 0.79/0.99  ;      2078 (49%) were retained.  Of these,
% 0.79/0.99  ;           35 ( 2%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.79/0.99  ;         2043 (98%) are still being kept.
% 0.79/0.99  ; 
% 0.79/0.99  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.79/0.99  ;     0.011   2%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 0.79/0.99  ;     0.003   1%   Assert                       (44 calls)
% 0.79/0.99  ;     0.169  37%   Process new row              (3,952 calls)
% 0.79/0.99  ;     0.100  22%   Resolution                   (272 calls)
% 0.79/0.99  ;     0.003   1%   Paramodulation               (136 calls)
% 0.79/0.99  ;     0.000   0%   Factoring                    (6 calls)
% 0.79/0.99  ;     0.010   2%   Condensing                   (860 calls)
% 0.79/0.99  ;     0.033   7%   Forward subsumption          (860 calls)
% 0.79/0.99  ;     0.025   5%   Backward subsumption         (791 calls)
% 0.79/0.99  ;     0.003   1%   Clause clause subsumption    (1,771 calls)
% 0.79/0.99  ;     0.050  11%   Forward simplification       (3,859 calls)
% 0.79/0.99  ;     0.011   2%   Backward simplification      (2,075 calls)
% 0.79/0.99  ;     0.002   0%   Ordering                     (1,856 calls)
% 0.79/0.99  ;     0.000   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 0.79/0.99  ;     0.000   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 0.79/0.99  ;     0.042   9%   Other
% 0.79/0.99  ;     0.462        Total
% 0.79/0.99  ;     0.463        Real time
% 0.79/0.99  ; 
% 0.79/0.99  ; Term-hash-array has 3,800 terms in all.
% 0.79/0.99  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 777 entries (777 at peak, 791 added, 14 deleted).
% 0.79/0.99  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 3,039 nodes (3,039 at peak, 3,095 added, 56 deleted).
% 0.79/0.99  ;  Retrieved 1,548 possibly forward subsuming rows in 860 calls.
% 0.79/0.99  ;  Retrieved 793 possibly backward subsumed rows in 791 calls.
% 0.79/0.99  ; Path-index has 3,768 entries (3,768 at peak, 3,822 added, 54 deleted).
% 0.79/0.99  ; Path-index has 3,779 nodes (3,779 at peak, 3,838 added, 59 deleted).
% 0.79/0.99  ; Trie-index has 3,768 entries (3,768 at peak, 3,822 added, 54 deleted).
% 0.79/0.99  ; Trie-index has 10,425 nodes (10,425 at peak, 10,551 added, 126 deleted).
% 0.79/0.99  ; Retrieved 2,752 generalization terms in 9,205 calls.
% 0.79/0.99  ; Retrieved 1,302 instance terms in 1,283 calls.
% 0.79/0.99  ; Retrieved 140,542 unifiable terms in 3,282 calls.
% 0.79/0.99  ; 
% 0.79/0.99  ; The agenda of rows to process has 168 entries:
% 0.79/0.99  ;     2 with value 8               8 with value 13               2 with value 17
% 0.79/0.99  ;     5 with value 9              32 with value 14               1 with value 18
% 0.79/0.99  ;     5 with value 10             36 with value 15               4 with value 19
% 0.79/0.99  ;    10 with value 11             49 with value 16               4 with value 20
% 0.79/0.99  ;    10 with value 12
% 0.79/0.99  ; The agenda of rows to give has 1909 entries:
% 0.79/0.99  ;    31 with value (4 8)          96 with value (4 20)           1 with value (4 31)
% 0.79/0.99  ;    54 with value (4 9)          55 with value (4 21)           5 with value (4 32)
% 0.79/0.99  ;    87 with value (4 10)         37 with value (4 22)           5 with value (4 33)
% 0.79/0.99  ;   110 with value (4 11)         24 with value (4 23)           2 with value (4 34)
% 0.79/0.99  ;    78 with value (4 12)         14 with value (4 24)           5 with value (4 38)
% 0.79/0.99  ;   170 with value (4 13)         12 with value (4 25)          10 with value (4 39)
% 0.79/0.99  ;   267 with value (4 14)          6 with value (4 26)           1 with value (4 40)
% 0.79/0.99  ;   279 with value (4 15)          5 with value (4 27)           5 with value (4 41)
% 0.79/0.99  ;   196 with value (4 16)          6 with value (4 28)           6 with value (4 42)
% 0.79/0.99  ;    94 with value (4 17)          2 with value (4 29)           2 with value (4 44)
% 0.79/0.99  ;   103 with value (4 18)          2 with value (4 30)           4 with value (4 45)
% 0.79/0.99  ;   135 with value (4 19)
% 0.79/0.99  Evaluation took:
% 0.79/0.99    0.465 seconds of real time
% 0.79/0.99    0.424291 seconds of user run time
% 0.79/0.99    0.03979 seconds of system run time
% 0.79/0.99    [Run times include 0.033 seconds GC run time.]
% 0.79/0.99    0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.79/0.99    0 page faults and
% 0.79/0.99    27,751,128 bytes consed.
% 0.79/0.99  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.79/0.99  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-09T20:15:18
% 0.79/0.99  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.79/0.99  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------