TSTP Solution File: SET073+1 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : SET073+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 00:09:03 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 6.70s 2.22s
% Output : CNFRefutation 6.70s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 10 ( 7 unt; 0 nHn; 7 RR)
% Number of literals : 15 ( 4 equ; 7 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 10 ( 5 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_89,plain,
( member(X1,unordered_pair(X2,X3))
| X1 != X2
| ~ member(X1,universal_class) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jbdc3i7o/input.p',i_0_89) ).
cnf(i_0_12,negated_conjecture,
unordered_pair(esk2_0,esk3_0) = null_class,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jbdc3i7o/input.p',i_0_12) ).
cnf(i_0_13,negated_conjecture,
member(esk2_0,universal_class),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jbdc3i7o/input.p',i_0_13) ).
cnf(i_0_54,plain,
~ member(X1,null_class),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jbdc3i7o/input.p',i_0_54) ).
cnf(c_0_94,plain,
( member(X1,unordered_pair(X2,X3))
| X1 != X2
| ~ member(X1,universal_class) ),
i_0_89 ).
cnf(c_0_95,plain,
( member(X1,unordered_pair(X1,X2))
| ~ member(X1,universal_class) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_94]) ).
cnf(c_0_96,negated_conjecture,
unordered_pair(esk2_0,esk3_0) = null_class,
i_0_12 ).
cnf(c_0_97,negated_conjecture,
member(esk2_0,universal_class),
i_0_13 ).
cnf(c_0_98,plain,
~ member(X1,null_class),
i_0_54 ).
cnf(c_0_99,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_95,c_0_96]),c_0_97])]),c_0_98]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11 % Problem : SET073+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 09:24:46 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.44 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.19/0.45 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.45 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.19/0.45 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.19/0.45 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 6.70/2.22 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y:
% 6.70/2.22 # Version: 2.1pre011
% 6.70/2.22 # Preprocessing time : 0.012 s
% 6.70/2.22
% 6.70/2.22 # Proof found!
% 6.70/2.22 # SZS status Theorem
% 6.70/2.22 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 6.70/2.22 # Proof object total steps : 10
% 6.70/2.22 # Proof object clause steps : 6
% 6.70/2.22 # Proof object formula steps : 4
% 6.70/2.22 # Proof object conjectures : 5
% 6.70/2.22 # Proof object clause conjectures : 3
% 6.70/2.22 # Proof object formula conjectures : 2
% 6.70/2.22 # Proof object initial clauses used : 4
% 6.70/2.22 # Proof object initial formulas used : 4
% 6.70/2.22 # Proof object generating inferences : 1
% 6.70/2.22 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 4
% 6.70/2.22 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 6.70/2.22 # Parsed axioms : 83
% 6.70/2.22 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 6.70/2.22 # Initial clauses : 83
% 6.70/2.22 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 6.70/2.22 # Initial clauses in saturation : 83
% 6.70/2.22 # Processed clauses : 100
% 6.70/2.22 # ...of these trivial : 1
% 6.70/2.22 # ...subsumed : 3
% 6.70/2.22 # ...remaining for further processing : 96
% 6.70/2.22 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 5
% 6.70/2.22 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 6.70/2.22 # Backward-subsumed : 4
% 6.70/2.22 # Backward-rewritten : 2
% 6.70/2.22 # Generated clauses : 256
% 6.70/2.22 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 223
% 6.70/2.22 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 6.70/2.22 # Paramodulations : 249
% 6.70/2.22 # Factorizations : 0
% 6.70/2.22 # Equation resolutions : 7
% 6.70/2.22 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 6.70/2.22 # Propositional unsat check successes : 0
% 6.70/2.22 # Current number of processed clauses : 86
% 6.70/2.22 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 18
% 6.70/2.22 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 6.70/2.22 # Negative unit clauses : 3
% 6.70/2.22 # Non-unit-clauses : 65
% 6.70/2.22 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 177
% 6.70/2.22 # ...number of literals in the above : 481
% 6.70/2.22 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 6.70/2.22 # Current number of archived clauses : 6
% 6.70/2.22 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 911
% 6.70/2.22 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 818
% 6.70/2.22 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 6
% 6.70/2.22 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 180
% 6.70/2.22 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 6.70/2.22 # BW rewrite match attempts : 15
% 6.70/2.22 # BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 6.70/2.22 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 6.70/2.22 # Condensation successes : 0
% 6.70/2.22 # Termbank termtop insertions : 7666
% 6.70/2.22
% 6.70/2.22 # -------------------------------------------------
% 6.70/2.22 # User time : 0.015 s
% 6.70/2.22 # System time : 0.003 s
% 6.70/2.22 # Total time : 0.018 s
% 6.70/2.22 # ...preprocessing : 0.012 s
% 6.70/2.22 # ...main loop : 0.005 s
% 6.70/2.22 # Maximum resident set size: 7136 pages
% 6.70/2.22
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------